Computer‐assisted image analysis of liver collagen: Relationship to Ishak scoring and hepatic venous pressure gradient

Histopathological scoring of disease stage uses descriptive categories without measuring the amount of fibrosis. Collagen, the major component of fibrous tissue, can be quantified by computer‐assisted digital image analysis (DIA) using histological sections. We determined relationships between DIA, Ishak stage, and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reflecting severity of fibrosis. One hundred fifteen patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) who had undergone transplantation had 250 consecutive transjugular liver biopsies combined with HVPG (median length, 22 mm; median total portal tracts, 12), evaluated using the Ishak system and stained with Sirus red for DIA. Liver collagen was expressed as collagen proportionate area (CPA). Median CPA was 6% (0.2‐45), correlating with Ishak stage (stage 6 range, 13%‐45%), and with HVPG (r = 0.62; P < 0.001). Median CPA was 4.1% when HVPG was less than 6 mm Hg and 13.8% when HVPG was 6 mm Hg or more (P < 0.0001) and 6% when HVPG was less than 10 mm Hg and 17.3% when HVPG was 10 mm Hg or higher (P < 0.0001). Only CPA, not Ishak stage/grade, was independently associated by logistic regression, with HVPG of 6 mm Hg or more [odds ratio, 1.206; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.094‐1.331; P < 0.001], or HVPG of 10 mm Hg or more (odds ratio, 1.105; 95% CI, 1.026‐1.191; P = 0.009). CPA increased by 50% (3.6%) compared with 20% in HVPG (1 mm Hg) in 38 patients with repeated biopsies. Conclusion: CPA assessed by DIA correlated with Ishak stage scores and HVPG measured contemporaneously. CPA was a better histological correlate with HVPG than Ishak stage, had a greater numerical change when HVPG was low, and resulted in further quantitation of fibrosis in cirrhosis. (HEPATOLOGY 2009.)

[1]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Clinical outcome of HCV‐related graft cirrhosis and prognostic value of hepatic venous pressure gradient , 2009, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[2]  Ze-Zhou Song Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography , 2008, Hepatology.

[3]  R. Fontana,et al.  Relationship of serum fibrosis markers with liver fibrosis stage and collagen content in patients with advanced chronic hepatitis C , 2008, Hepatology.

[4]  Dieter Häussinger,et al.  Transient elastography is unreliable for detection of cirrhosis in patients with acute liver damage , 2007, Hepatology.

[5]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient to assess fibrosis and its progression after liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis , 2007, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[6]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  Transjugular liver biopsy--indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications--a systematic review. , 2007, Journal of hepatology.

[7]  Ramon Planas,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[8]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  Transjugular liver biopsy in patients with diffuse liver disease: comparison of three cores with one or two cores for accurate histological interpretation , 2007, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[9]  R. Sacco,et al.  Transient elastography: a new surrogate marker of liver fibrosis influenced by major changes of transaminases , 2007, Journal of viral hepatitis.

[10]  R. Becker,et al.  Progression of fibrosis in advanced chronic hepatitis C: Evaluation by morphometric image analysis , 2007, Hepatology.

[11]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  [178] TRANSJUGULAR LIVER BIOPSY: ARE 4 CORES BETTER THAN 3 AND DOES A CASSETTE PREVENT FRAGMENTATION , 2007 .

[12]  C. Trautwein,et al.  Report of the monothematic EASL conference on liver transplantation for viral hepatitis (Paris, France, January 12-14, 2006). , 2006, Journal of hepatology.

[13]  Laura Marelli,et al.  A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[14]  E. Cholongitas,et al.  Transjugular liver biopsy: how good is it for accurate histological interpretation? , 2006, Gut.

[15]  R. Standish,et al.  An appraisal of the histopathological assessment of liver fibrosis , 2006, Gut.

[16]  X. Forns,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient identifies patients at risk of severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation , 2006, Hepatology.

[17]  P. Neuhaus,et al.  Impact of Donor Age and Year of Transplantation on Graft and Patient Survival Following Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C Virus , 2006, Transplantation.

[18]  C. Ripoll,et al.  Influence of hepatic venous pressure gradient on the prediction of survival of patients with cirrhosis in the MELD Era , 2005, Hepatology.

[19]  L. Seeff,et al.  Aasld Practice Guideline Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment of Hepatitis C , 2003 .

[20]  R. Groszmann,et al.  The hepatic venous pressure gradient: Anything worth doing should be done right , 2004, Hepatology.

[21]  V. Paradis,et al.  Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C , 2003, Hepatology.

[22]  R. Wiesner,et al.  Report of the First International Liver Transplantation Society Expert Panel Consensus Conference on Liver Transplantation and Hepatitis C , 2003, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[23]  G. Leandro,et al.  Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease. , 2003, Journal of hepatology.

[24]  J. Berlin,et al.  The association between hepatitis C infection and survival after orthotopic liver transplantation. , 2002, Gastroenterology.

[25]  R. Groszmann,et al.  Assessment of therapeutic benefit of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C: is hepatic venous pressure gradient a better end point? , 2002, Gut.

[26]  L. Ferrell,et al.  HCV-related fibrosis progression following liver transplantation: increase in recent years. , 2000, Journal of hepatology.

[27]  Xi-Zhang Lin,et al.  The normal adult human liver biopsy: A quantitative reference standard , 1998, Hepatology.

[28]  A. Burroughs,et al.  Hepatic venous pressure measurement: An old test as a new prognostic marker in cirrhosis? , 1997, Hepatology.

[29]  K. Ishak,et al.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. , 1995 .

[30]  W. Jiménez,et al.  Measurement of fibrosis in needle liver biopsies: Evaluation of a colorimetric method , 1985, Hepatology.

[31]  M. Rojkind,et al.  A simple micromethod for collagen and total protein determination in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. , 1985, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[32]  M Rojkind,et al.  The extracellular matrix of the liver. , 1982, Collagen and related research.