Representation of possible and impossible objects in the human visual cortex: Evidence from fMRI adaptation

Impossible objects are defined as 2D drawings that represent objects that could not exist in real 3D space. Previous studies have proposed that such objects are represented differently in long-term memory due to their invalid spatial structure. Nevertheless, it is not clear whether these discrepancies reflect early perceptual processes or late, post-recognition, processes. Here, we address this issue by using fMRI adaptation. Interestingly, equivalent adaptation levels were obtained for repeated compared to non-repeated possible and impossible objects in object selective regions within the human high-level visual cortex. Yet, a significant correlation between fMRI adaptation and behavioral facilitation was found for possible but not for impossible objects, thus exhibiting some dissociation in the representation of the two object categories. Overall, our findings suggest that the initial perception of possible and impossible objects is mediated by shared neural mechanisms whereas the observed differences between the two types of objects may reflect higher post-recognition processes.

[1]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Representation of the perceived 3-D object shape in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Guy A. Orban,et al.  The Extraction of 3D Shape from Texture and Shading in the Human Brain , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Object and space-based attentional selection in three-dimensional space , 2001 .

[5]  L. Cooper,et al.  Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  L. Cooper,et al.  Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  O. Reiser,et al.  Principles Of Gestalt Psychology , 1936 .

[8]  Galit Yovel,et al.  The Body Inversion Effect Is Mediated by Face-Selective, Not Body-Selective, Mechanisms , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Shape‐selective stereo processing in human object‐related visual areas , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Christian Büchel,et al.  The functional and temporal characteristics of top-down modulation in visual selection. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  I Kovács,et al.  A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  R. Penrose,et al.  Impossible objects: a special type of visual illusion. , 1958, British journal of psychology.

[13]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Neural correlates of disparity-defined shape discrimination in the human brain. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Yaakov Stern,et al.  Bias effects in the possible/impossible object decision test with matching objects , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[15]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[16]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  The representation of object viewpoint in human visual cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain , 2001, NeuroImage.

[19]  T. Hendler,et al.  Object-completion effects in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  M. Tarr,et al.  Structural processing and implicit memory for possible and impossible figures. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Reductions in neural activity underlie behavioral components of repetition priming , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  3D shape perception from combined depth cues in human visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  D. Friedman,et al.  Repetition priming of possible and impossible objects from ERP and behavioral perspectives. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[24]  Stephen A. Engel,et al.  Neural Response to Perception of Volume in the Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Neuron.

[25]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Confidence intervals in repeated-measures designs: The number of observations principle. , 2009, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[26]  R. Malach,et al.  Top-down engagement modulates the neural expressions of visual expertise. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Yaakov Stern,et al.  An event-related fMRI study of the neural networks underlying repetition suppression and reaction time priming in implicit visual memory , 2006, Brain Research.

[28]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Top-Down Reorganization of Activity in the Visual Pathway after Learning a Shape Identification Task , 2005, Neuron.

[29]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[30]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Chun,et al.  Dissociating Task Performance from fMRI Repetition Attenuation in Ventral Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Functional MRI Reveals Compromised Neural Integrity of the Face Processing Network in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2009, Current Biology.

[33]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Object-selective cortex exhibits performance-independent repetition suppression. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  A. Norcia,et al.  Configural specificity of the lateral occipital cortex , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Max Wertheimer,et al.  Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt , .

[37]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Evaluating models of object-decision priming: evidence from event-related potential repetition effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[39]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  Representation of shapes, edges, and surfaces across multiple cues in the human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Is size perception based on monocular distance cues computed automatically? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Brain regions associated with retrieval of structurally coherent visual information , 1995, Nature.

[42]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[43]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.