The role of intercalating residues in chromosomal high-mobility-group protein DNA binding, bending and specificity.

Ubiquitous high-mobility-group (HMGB) chromosomal proteins bind DNA in a non-sequence- specific fashion to promote chromatin function and gene regulation. Minor groove DNA binding of the HMG domain induces substantial DNA bending toward the major groove, and several interfacial residues contribute by DNA intercalation. The role of the intercalating residues in DNA binding, bending and specificity was systematically examined for a series of mutant Drosophila HMGB (HMG-D) proteins. The primary intercalating residue of HMG-D, Met13, is required both for high-affinity DNA binding and normal DNA bending. Leu9 and Tyr12 directly interact with Met13 and are required for HMG domain stability in addition to linear DNA binding and bending, which is an important function for these residues. In contrast, DNA binding and bending is retained in truncations of intercalating residues Val32 and Thr33 to alanine, but DNA bending is decreased for the glycine substitutions. Furthermore, substitution of the intercalating residues with those predicted to be involved in the specificity of the HMG domain transcription factors results in increased DNA affinity and decreased DNA bending without increased specificity. These studies reveal the importance of residues that buttress intercalating residues and suggest that features of the HMG domain other than a few base-specific hydrogen bonds distinguish the sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific HMG domain functions.

[1]  A. E. Ferentz,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of disulfide cross-linked oligonucleotides , 1993 .

[2]  S. Diekmann,et al.  The recognition of distorted DNA structures by HMG-D: a footprinting and molecular modelling study. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  D. Edwards,et al.  Coregulatory proteins in steroid hormone receptor action: The role of chromatin high mobility group proteins HMG-1 and -2 , 1999, Steroids.

[4]  A. Travers,et al.  The acidic tail of the high mobility group protein HMG-D modulates the structural selectivity of DNA binding. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  E. Laue,et al.  Structure of the A-domain of HMG1 and its interaction with DNA as studied by heteronuclear three- and four-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[6]  James E Masse,et al.  The S. cerevisiae architectural HMGB protein NHP6A complexed with DNA: DNA and protein conformational changes upon binding. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  S. Wolfe,et al.  Structural studies of the high mobility group globular domain and basic tail of HMG-D bound to disulfide cross-linked DNA. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[8]  D. Landsman,et al.  The HMG-1 box protein family: classification and functional relationships. , 1995, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Robert Tjian,et al.  Nucleolar transcription factor hUBF contains a DNA-binding motif with homology to HMG proteins , 1990, Nature.

[10]  P N Goodfellow,et al.  SRY and sex determination in mammals. , 1993, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  The nonspecific DNA-binding and -bending proteins HMG1 and HMG2 promote the assembly of complex nucleoprotein structures. , 1993, Genes & development.

[12]  A. Travers,et al.  HMG1 and 2, and related 'architectural' DNA-binding proteins. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[13]  L. Tang,et al.  Determining the DNA bending angle induced by non-specific high mobility group-1 (HMG-1) proteins: a novel method. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[14]  N. Kallenbach,et al.  Alanine mutagenesis of high-mobility-group-protein-1 box B (HMG1-B). , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[15]  T. Moss,et al.  At the Center of Eukaryotic Life , 2002, Cell.

[16]  M. Štros,et al.  DNA bending by the chromosomal protein HMG1 and its high mobility group box domains. Effect of flanking sequences. , 1998, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  G M Clore,et al.  Structural basis for SRY-dependent 46-X,Y sex reversal: modulation of DNA bending by a naturally occurring point mutation. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  S. Lippard,et al.  Intercalating residues determine the mode of HMG1 domains A and B binding to cisplatin-modified DNA. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[19]  K. Weeks,et al.  Van't Hoff enthalpies without baselines , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  David A. Case,et al.  Structural basis for DNA bending by the architectural transcription factor LEF-1 , 1995, Nature.

[21]  J. Griffith,et al.  TRF1 binds a bipartite telomeric site with extreme spatial flexibility , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[22]  F. Allain,et al.  Solution structure of the HMG protein NHP6A and its interaction with DNA reveals the structural determinants for non‐sequence‐specific binding , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[23]  P. Cary,et al.  Solution structure and backbone dynamics of the DNA‐binding domain of mouse Sox‐5 , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  T. Wirth,et al.  High mobility group protein 2 functionally interacts with the POU domains of octamer transcription factors. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[25]  W. DeGrado,et al.  A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. , 1990, Science.

[26]  R Grosschedl,et al.  DNA-binding properties of the HMG domain of the lymphoid-specific transcriptional regulator LEF-1. , 1991, Genes & development.

[27]  P. Cary,et al.  The DNA sequence specificity of HMG boxes lies in the minor wing of the structure. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[28]  P. Kraulis A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[29]  F. Murphy,et al.  Nonsequence-specific DNA recognition: a structural perspective. , 2000, Structure.

[30]  J. Feigon,et al.  Binding to cisplatin-modified DNA by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMGB protein Nhp6A. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[31]  C. Prives,et al.  High mobility group protein-1 (HMG-1) is a unique activator of p53. , 1998, Genes & development.

[32]  R. Lovell-Badge,et al.  Sex‐reversing mutations affect the architecture of SRY‐DNA complexes. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[33]  K. Mitsouras,et al.  The DNA Architectural Protein HMGB1 Displays Two Distinct Modes of Action That Promote Enhanceosome Assembly , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[34]  R Grosschedl,et al.  HMG domain proteins: architectural elements in the assembly of nucleoprotein structures. , 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[35]  R M Sweet,et al.  The structure of a chromosomal high mobility group protein–DNA complex reveals sequence‐neutral mechanisms important for non‐sequence‐specific DNA recognition , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[36]  M. Bianchi,et al.  High Mobility Group Protein 1 Interacts Specifically with the Core Domain of Human TATA Box-binding Protein and Interferes with Transcription Factor IIB within the Pre-initiation Complex* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  Michael Carey,et al.  Mechanism for Specificity by HMG-1 in Enhanceosome Assembly , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[38]  Robert L. Baldwin,et al.  Relative helix-forming tendencies of nonpolar amino acids , 1990, Nature.

[39]  M. Štros,et al.  A Role of Basic Residues and the Putative Intercalating Phenylalanine of the HMG-1 Box B in DNA Supercoiling and Binding to Four-way DNA Junctions* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  V. P. Chuprina,et al.  Solution Structure of the Sequence-specific HMG Box of the Lymphocyte Transcriptional Activator Sox-4 (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  C. Pabo,et al.  Basis for recognition of cisplatin-modified DNA by high-mobility-group proteins , 1999, Nature.

[42]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Molecular basis of human 46X,Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex , 1995, Cell.

[43]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Evidence for a shared structural role for HMG1 and linker histones B4 and H1 in organizing chromatin. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[44]  M. Webb,et al.  Structure-specific binding of the two tandem HMG boxes of HMG1 to four-way junction DNA is mediated by the A domain. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  V. Grantcharova,et al.  Modifying the helical structure of DNA by design: recruitment of an architecture-specific protein to an enforced DNA bend. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[46]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Structural and Kinetic Studies of a Cisplatin-modified DNA Icosamer Binding to HMG 1 Domain B , 1999 .

[47]  Aris Floratos,et al.  Combinatorial pattern discovery in biological sequences: The TEIRESIAS algorithm [published erratum appears in Bioinformatics 1998;14(2): 229] , 1998, Bioinform..

[48]  D. Edwards,et al.  High-Mobility Group Chromatin Proteins 1 and 2 Functionally Interact with Steroid Hormone Receptors To Enhance Their DNA Binding In Vitro and Transcriptional Activity in Mammalian Cells , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[49]  P. Kraulis,et al.  Structure of the HMG box motif in the B‐domain of HMG1. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[50]  M. Churchill,et al.  Oxidation of a critical methionine modulates DNA binding of the Drosophila melanogaster high mobility group protein, HMG‐D , 1997, FEBS letters.

[51]  J. Keeler,et al.  The solution structure and dynamics of the DNA-binding domain of HMG-D from Drosophila melanogaster. , 1994, Structure.

[52]  A. Travers,et al.  DNA conformation and protein binding. , 1989, Annual review of biochemistry.

[53]  A. Travers,et al.  Structural requirements for cooperative binding of HMG1 to DNA minicircles. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  P. Donahoe,et al.  Molecular basis of mammalian sexual determination: activation of Müllerian inhibiting substance gene expression by SRY. , 1994, Science.

[55]  A. Travers,et al.  HMG‐D is an architecture‐specific protein that preferentially binds to DNA containing the dinucleotide TG. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[56]  Robin Lovell-Badge,et al.  A gene from the human sex-determining region encodes a protein with homology to a conserved DNA-binding motif , 1990, Nature.

[57]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  Determinants of DNA binding and bending by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group protein NHP6A that are important for its biological activities. Role of the unique N terminus and putative intercalating methionine. , 1998, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[58]  E A Merritt,et al.  Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[59]  D. Landsman,et al.  A signature for the HMG‐1 box DNA‐binding proteins , 1993, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[60]  M. Weiss,et al.  The SRY high-mobility-group box recognizes DNA by partial intercalation in the minor groove: a topological mechanism of sequence specificity. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  D. V. van Gent,et al.  Stimulation of V(D)J cleavage by high mobility group proteins , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[62]  J. O. Thomas,et al.  Differences in the DNA-binding properties of the HMG-box domains of HMG1 and the sex-determining factor SRY. , 1995, European journal of biochemistry.

[63]  R. Roeder,et al.  The high mobility group protein HMG1 can reversibly inhibit class II gene transcription by interaction with the TATA-binding protein. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[64]  D. Lilley,et al.  The DNA binding site of HMG1 protein is composed of two similar segments (HMG boxes), both of which have counterparts in other eukaryotic regulatory proteins. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[65]  K. Schulten,et al.  Structure prediction of a complex between the chromosomal protein HMG‐D and DNA , 1998, Proteins.

[66]  M. Helmer-Citterich,et al.  HMG1 interacts with HOX proteins and enhances their DNA binding and transcriptional activation. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[67]  M. Churchill,et al.  Interactions of high mobility group box proteins with DNA and chromatin. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[68]  S. Diekmann,et al.  DNA bending induced by high mobility group proteins studied by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[69]  M. Štros Two mutations of basic residues within the N-terminus of HMG-1 B domain with different effects on DNA supercoiling and binding to bent DNA. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[70]  M. Weiss,et al.  Floppy SOX: mutual induced fit in hmg (high-mobility group) box-DNA recognition. , 2001, Molecular endocrinology.

[71]  R. Reeves,et al.  High-mobility-group chromosomal proteins: architectural components that facilitate chromatin function. , 1996, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[72]  M. Weiss,et al.  The SRY cantilever motif discriminates between sequence- and structure-specific DNA recognition: alanine mutagenesis of an HMG box. , 1997, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.