Molecular-level origins of biomass recalcitrance: decrystallization free energies for four common cellulose polymorphs.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Baron Peters | Gregg T Beckham | Michael E Himmel | Michael F Crowley | Yannick J Bomble | M. Himmel | Y. Bomble | B. Peters | M. Crowley | G. Beckham | James F Matthews | J. Matthews
[1] Cindy Starbuck,et al. Surface-mediated nucleation in the solid-state polymorph transformation of terephthalic acid. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[2] S. Hayashi,et al. Structural stability of the solvated cellulose IIII crystal models: a molecular dynamics study , 2009 .
[3] H. Blanch,et al. A mechanistic model of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[4] J. Sugiyama,et al. Localization of crystalline allomorphs in cellulose microfibril. , 2009, Biomacromolecules.
[5] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. CHARMM Additive All-Atom Force Field for Glycosidic Linkages between Hexopyranoses. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[6] D. Wilson. Cellulases and biofuels. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[7] B. Henrissat,et al. Structural changes of cellulose crystals during the reversible transformation cellulose I⇄IIII in Valonia , 1986 .
[8] Jay H. Lee,et al. Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. , 2009, Biotechnology advances.
[9] C. Wyman,et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. , 2005, Bioresource technology.
[10] Robin D. Rogers,et al. Dissolution of Cellose with Ionic Liquids , 2002 .
[11] J. Murdoch. What is the rate-limiting step of a multistep reaction? , 1981 .
[12] R. Atalla,et al. Native Cellulose: A Composite of Two Distinct Crystalline Forms , 1984, Science.
[13] G. P. Johnson,et al. Conformational flexibility of soluble cellulose oligomers: chain length and temperature dependence. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[14] T. Jeoh,et al. Molecular-scale investigations of cellulose microstructure during enzymatic hydrolysis. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.
[15] L. Lo Leggio,et al. Stimulation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by proteins of glycoside hydrolase family 61: structure and function of a large, enigmatic family. , 2010, Biochemistry.
[16] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..
[17] R. Swendsen,et al. THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .
[18] S. Ramakrishnan,et al. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose dissolved in N-methyl morpholine oxide/water solutions. , 2010, Bioresource technology.
[19] Seema Singh,et al. Visualization of biomass solubilization and cellulose regeneration during ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[20] C L Brooks,et al. Calculations on folding of segment B1 of streptococcal protein G. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[21] M. Wada,et al. Activation of crystalline cellulose to cellulose IIII results in efficient hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolase , 2007, The FEBS journal.
[22] K Schulten,et al. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.
[23] David K. Johnson,et al. Biomass Recalcitrance: Engineering Plants and Enzymes for Biofuels Production , 2007, Science.
[24] B. Simmons,et al. Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: Biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification. , 2010, Bioresource technology.
[25] G. Huber,et al. Production of Liquid Alkanes by Aqueous-Phase Processing of Biomass-Derived Carbohydrates , 2005, Science.
[26] D. Wilson,et al. Processivity, Synergism, and Substrate Specificity of Thermobifida fusca Cel6B , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[27] M. Himmel,et al. The O-glycosylated linker from the Trichoderma reesei Family 7 cellulase is a flexible, disordered protein. , 2010, Biophysical journal.
[28] Frances H Arnold,et al. A family of thermostable fungal cellulases created by structure-guided recombination , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[29] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .
[30] M. Penttilä,et al. High Speed Atomic Force Microscopy Visualizes Processive Movement of Trichoderma reesei Cellobiohydrolase I on Crystalline Cellulose* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[31] J. Keasling,et al. Microbial production of fatty-acid-derived fuels and chemicals from plant biomass , 2010, Nature.
[32] B. Synstad,et al. Costs and benefits of processivity in enzymatic degradation of recalcitrant polysaccharides , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[33] T. Yui,et al. Structure conversions of cellulose IIII crystal models in solution state: a molecular dynamics study , 2010 .
[34] P. Langan,et al. X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 a resolution. , 2001, Biomacromolecules.
[35] J. Sugiyama,et al. The enzymatic susceptibility of cellulose microfibrils of the algal-bacterial type and the cotton-ramie type , 1997 .
[36] Charlotte K. Williams,et al. The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.
[37] Esben Thormann,et al. Force pulling of single cellulose chains at the crystalline cellulose-liquid interface: a molecular dynamics study. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[38] David A. Case,et al. Dynamics of ligand escape from the heme pocket of myoglobin , 1988 .
[39] T. A. Jones,et al. High-resolution crystal structures reveal how a cellulose chain is bound in the 50 A long tunnel of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[40] P. Weimer,et al. Differential Fermentation of Cellulose Allomorphs by Ruminal Cellulolytic Bacteria , 1991, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[41] V. Eijsink,et al. Towards new enzymes for biofuels: lessons from chitinase research. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.
[42] P. Langan,et al. Cellulose IIII Crystal Structure and Hydrogen Bonding by Synchrotron X-ray and Neutron Fiber Diffraction , 2004 .
[43] I. S. Pretorius,et al. Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.
[44] J. Liao,et al. Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels , 2008, Nature.
[45] James A. Dumesic,et al. Analyses of Reaction Schemes Using De Donder Relations , 1999 .
[46] Jianpeng Ma,et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[47] S. Gnanakaran,et al. In silico studies of crystalline cellulose and its degradation by enzymes. , 2010, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[48] M. Himmel,et al. Computer simulation studies of microcrystalline cellulose Iβ , 2006 .
[49] Bernard R. Brooks,et al. Solvent-Induced Forces between Two Hydrophilic Groups , 1994 .
[50] Effect of sodium hydroxide treatment of bacterial cellulose on cellulase activity , 2008 .
[51] H. Schüttler,et al. Cellulose hydrolysis in evolving substrate morphologies I: A general modeling formalism , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[52] J. Sugiyama,et al. The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[53] M. Himmel,et al. Identification of amino acids responsible for processivity in a Family 1 carbohydrate-binding module from a fungal cellulase. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[54] G. Torrie,et al. Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo free-energy estimation: Umbrella sampling , 1977 .
[55] B. Synstad,et al. The Non-catalytic Chitin-binding Protein CBP21 from Serratia marcescens Is Essential for Chitin Degradation*♦ , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[56] Ross C Walker,et al. Computational simulations of the Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I acting on microcrystalline cellulose Ibeta: the enzyme-substrate complex. , 2009, Carbohydrate research.
[57] S. Gåseidnes,et al. Structural insights into the catalytic mechanism of a family 18 exo-chitinase , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[58] T. Reinikainen,et al. The three-dimensional crystal structure of the catalytic core of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei. , 1994, Science.
[59] Mark F. Davis,et al. Cellulase digestibility of pretreated biomass is limited by cellulose accessibility , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.
[60] D. Cosgrove. Growth of the plant cell wall , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[61] Edward A Bayer,et al. Applications of computational science for understanding enzymatic deconstruction of cellulose. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[62] A. Stipanovic,et al. Effect of digestion by pure cellulases on crystallinity and average chain length for bacterial and microcrystalline celluloses , 2007 .
[63] Paul Langan,et al. Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Ibeta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[64] Bruce E Dale,et al. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. , 2011, Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering.
[65] Christopher H. Chang,et al. The energy landscape for the interaction of the family 1 carbohydrate-binding module and the cellulose surface is altered by hydrolyzed glycosidic bonds. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[66] Michael E Himmel,et al. The maize primary cell wall microfibril: a new model derived from direct visualization. , 2006, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.