SUMMARY Adaptive stacking provides a powerful and rapid procedure for estimating the residual patterns across a network of seismic stations. The approach exploits predictions from some propagation model to achieve an approximate alignment of traces, which are then stacked to form a reference trace. Iterative improvement of the alignment, by comparison of the reference trace with each station trace, leads to a direct estimate of the residuals from the propagation model. Our implementation is fast and robust in the presence of significant noise and waveforms of different character. The major difference from earlier forms is the use of a direct minimization scheme for determining the best match between the reference stacked trace and each recorded trace based on an L 3 measure of misfit. This approach has the benefit of generating automatic error estimates. For teleseismic applications, the ak135 model has proved to be very effective for selection of the window around the desired phase and in achieving initial alignment. The approach can be applied to both first motion (P) and later phases (e.g. PcP), with extraction of absolute time via the improved signal-to-noise properties of the stacked trace, after full alignment. The new method is illustrated with three teleseismic events from a similar source region that were recorded by the 72 station TIGGER array in northern Tasmania. Despite significant levels of noise and contrasting waveforms produced by the three events, the residual patterns are very similar. Even when large time-shifts are introduced into the records, trace alignment is achieved with rapid convergence of the iterative procedure and excellent recovery of the imposed shifts. These results confirm adaptive stacking as a valuable alternative to data based cross-correlation techniques, particularly when heterogeneous instrumentation is employed.
[1]
Eystein S. Husebye,et al.
Application of array data processing techniques to a network of ordinary seismograph stations
,
1968
.
[2]
John C. VanDecar,et al.
Determination of teleseismic relative phase arrival times using multi-channel cross-correlation and least squares
,
1990
.
[3]
Dogan Seber,et al.
Three‐dimensional upper mantle structure beneath the intraplate Atlas and interplate Rif mountains of Morocco
,
1996
.
[4]
E. S. Husebye,et al.
Errors in time delay measurements
,
1971
.
[5]
Michael G. Bostock,et al.
Seismic structure of the upper mantle beneath the northern Canadian Cordillera from teleseismic travel-time inversion
,
1998
.
[6]
E. R. Engdahl,et al.
Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes
,
1995
.
[7]
S. Chevrot,et al.
Optimal measurement of relative and absolute delay times by simulated annealing
,
2002
.
[8]
Marcelo Assumpção,et al.
Seismic evidence for a fossil mantle plume beneath South America and implications for plate driving forces
,
1995,
Nature.
[9]
Frederik Tilmann,et al.
P-wave velocity structure of the uppermost mantle beneath Hawaii from traveltime tomography
,
2001
.
[10]
Weijian Mao,et al.
Simultaneous determination of time delays and stacking weights in seismic array beamforming
,
1995
.
[11]
Eystein S. Husebye,et al.
Application of array data processing techniques to the swedish seismograph stations
,
1966
.
[12]
Matthew J. Fouch,et al.
Tectospheric structure beneath southern Africa
,
2001
.
[13]
Thomas J. Owens,et al.
Upper mantle seismic velocity structure beneath Tanzania, east Africa: Implications for the stability of cratonic lithosphere
,
1998
.