Kinematic analysis of footstep strategies in asymmetrical lifting and lowering tasks

Abstract Two footstep strategies associated with expert workers and two associated with novice workers were studied for lifting and lowering a 12 kg box. Kinematic variables, L5/S1 resultant moments and body postures of eight healthy male subjects were used to analyse the effects of the footstep strategies. A tridimensional dynamic rigid body model was used to estimate L5/S1 resultant moment, using inertial forces to estimate external forces; these procedures were validated with force platforms. Results showed that expert strategies either reduced the path of the subject's centre of gravity or reduced the asymmetry of posture at deposit. The footstep strategies showed no consistent effect on L5/S1 resultant moment. The use of different footstep strategies might be aimed at different goals, which may depend on the context. On the one hand, the reduction in the path of the subject's centre of gravity might represent a mean to reduce the effort required and avoid fatigue, which might be appropriate in some circumstances; on the other hand, the reduction of asymmetry of posture at deposit might be more appropriate in other circumstances. Footstep strategies will deserve further attention since this study showed that they can play an important role in reducing the risks of injury. Relevance to industry Manual materials handling is a major known source of industrial injury. Biomechanical studies of handling strategies really used by workers should help understand the loadings encountered in real handling tasks, which may lead to the identification of safer handling strategies.

[1]  Herman J. Woltring,et al.  A fortran package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation , 1986 .

[2]  Genaro Tolentino Marzan,et al.  Rational Design for Close-Range Photogrammetry , 1976 .

[3]  Monique Lortie,et al.  The handling of objects other than boxes: univariate analysis of handling techniques in a large transport company. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[4]  M. de Looze,et al.  Validation of a dynamic linked segment model to calculate joint moments in lifting. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Monique Lortie,et al.  Incidents in manual handling activities , 1996 .

[6]  G. Wahba Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1975 .

[7]  A. Plamondon,et al.  Validation of two 3-D segment models to calculate the net reaction forces and moments at the L(5)/S(1) joint in lifting. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[9]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  The Mass and Inertia Characteristics of the Main Segments of the Human Body , 1983 .

[10]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Monique Lortie,et al.  Manual handling techniques: Comparing novices and experts , 1996 .

[12]  M Lortie,et al.  Manual handling in warehouses: the illusion of correct working postures. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[13]  G. Street Biomechanics IX-B , 1985 .

[14]  M Gagnon,et al.  The influence of dynamic factors on triaxial net muscular moments at the L5/S1 joint during asymmetrical lifting and lowering. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Gagnon,et al.  Handgrip and Box Tilting Strategies in Handling: Effect on Stability and Trunk and Knee Efforts. , 1996, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[16]  Anil Mital,et al.  Kinetic analysis of manual lifting activities: Part I—Development of a three-dimensional computer model , 1986 .

[17]  A Plamondon,et al.  Pivoting with the load. An alternative for protecting the back in asymmetrical lifting. , 1993, Spine.

[18]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  A Survey of Industrial Box Handling , 1982 .

[19]  D B Chaffin,et al.  A dynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum acceptable loads. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Monique Lortie,et al.  Handling Techniques: The Influence of Weight and Height for Experts and Novices. , 1995, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[21]  A Plamondon,et al.  Moments at the L(5)/S(1) joint during asymmetrical lifting: effects of different load trajectories and initial load positions. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.