Responses to a Decision Aid on Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practices.

INTRODUCTION Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains controversial, with most guidelines recommending shared decision making. This study describes men's PSA screening preferences before and after viewing a decision aid and relates these preferences to subsequent clinician visit content. METHODS Men were recruited from two health systems in 2009-2013. Participants answered a questionnaire before and after decision aid viewing addressing PSA screening preferences and five basic knowledge questions. At one health system, participants also answered a survey after a subsequent clinician visit. Data were analyzed in 2014. RESULTS One thousand forty-one predominantly white, well-educated men responded to the pre- and post-viewing questionnaire (25% and 29% response rates at the two sites). After viewing, the proportion of patients leaning away from PSA screening increased significantly (p<0.001), with 386 (38%) leaning toward PSA screening versus 436 (43%) before viewing; 174 (17%) unsure versus 319 (32%) before; and 448 (44%) leaning away versus 253 (25%) before. Higher knowledge scores were associated with being more likely to lean against screening and less likely to be unsure (p<0.001). Among 278 men who also completed a questionnaire after a subsequent clinician visit, participants who planned to discuss PSA screening with their clinicians were significantly more likely to report such discussions than participants who did not (148/217 [68%] vs 16/46 [35%], respectively [p<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS A decision aid reduces men's interest in PSA screening, particularly among the initially unsure. Men who plan to discuss PSA screening with their clinician after a decision aid are more likely to do so.

[1]  Caroline S. Dorfman,et al.  Physicians' attitudes about shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. , 2011, Family medicine.

[2]  L. Squiers,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen testing: men's responses to 2012 recommendation against screening. , 2013, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  David Chia,et al.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  C. Klabunde,et al.  National Evidence on the Use of Shared Decision Making in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening , 2013, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[6]  R. Volk,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. , 1999, Archives of family medicine.

[7]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Guidance Statement From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  Robert M. Kaplan,et al.  A randomized controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test , 2003, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  Mohammad Hassan Murad,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[10]  T. Wilt,et al.  Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[11]  H. Welch A piece of my mind. Making the call. , 2011, JAMA.

[12]  A. D'Amico,et al.  American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Update 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  V. Moyer,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  T. Wilt,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.