Chapter 3 Donor Heart Allocation

The limited number of donor hearts is one of the greatest and persistent challenges to heart transplantation. Allocation of this precious resource requires the integration of objective data, clinical intuition, and moral fairness. Institution of an allocation system by UNOS has provided important structure to the allocation methodology. The system must be periodically reviewed and reorganized to ensure it is reflective of current patient disease and clinical practice and builds upon the previous knowledge paradigms. Since the establishment of the 2006 allocation system, not only has there been a dramatic increase in the number of heart transplant candidates, but also a dramatic increase in the number of patients qualifying as high-priority candidates. To address these changes, UNOS Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee was tasked with providing a revised allocation system. The resulting system aims to improve waitlist mortality and posttransplant outcomes by better prioritizing the highest acuity patients while improving the geographic distribution of organ offers.

[1]  A. Israni,et al.  OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Heart , 2017, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[2]  L. Lund,et al.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-third Adult Heart Transplantation Report-2016; Focus Theme: Primary Diagnostic Indications for Transplant. , 2016, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  M. Walsh,et al.  Advanced (stage D) heart failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines Committee. , 2015, Journal of cardiac failure.

[4]  K. Khush,et al.  National Decline in Donor Heart Utilization With Regional Variability: 1995–2010 , 2015, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[5]  C. Lehr,et al.  Candidacy for lung transplant and lung allocation. , 2015, Thoracic surgery clinics.

[6]  J. Rogers,et al.  The Future Direction of the Adult Heart Allocation System in the United States , 2015, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[7]  Dean Y. Li,et al.  Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Transplant Candidates Supported With Mechanical Circulatory Support: Is Reappraisal of the Current United Network for Organ Sharing Thoracic Organ Allocation Policy Justified? , 2012, Circulation.

[8]  D. Feldman,et al.  Stable patients on left ventricular assist device support have a disproportionate advantage: time to re-evaluate the current UNOS policy. , 2011, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[9]  J. Fleg,et al.  Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  R. Hershberger,et al.  Care processes and clinical outcomes of continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) in patients with refractory endstage heart failure. , 2003, Journal of cardiac failure.

[11]  M C Oz,et al.  Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D. Sandler,et al.  Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction , 2014 .

[13]  L. Edwards,et al.  Current status of thoracic organ transplantation and allocation in the United States. , 2004, Clinical transplants.

[14]  I. I. Cherkasov,et al.  [Rupture of the posterior wall of the left ventricle after mitral valve prosthesis]. , 1991, Khirurgiia.