Achieving Milestones as a Prerequisite for Proceeding With a Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Although the National Institutes of Health (NIH) invests $30 billion in research annually, many funded studies fail to generate results that can inform practice. The National Institutes of Health introduced a phased funding mechanism as one potential solution. Study-specific milestones are established for an initial pilot phase. We assess the utility of this phased approach through the ongoing Electroencephalography (EEG) Guidance of Anesthesia to Alleviate Geriatric Syndromes (ENGAGES) pragmatic clinical trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that EEG guidance of general anesthesia, through prevention of EEG suppression, can decrease postoperative delirium and its downstream negative sequelae. METHODS: In collaboration with study stakeholders, we identified critical milestones for the ENGAGES study, with themes common to many clinical trials. These themes include: regulatory tasks; enrollment targets; feasibility and impact of study intervention; primary outcome incidence; measurement reliability of primary outcome; and follow-up. Progress in achieving the milestones was assessed at regular intervals during the pilot phase by ENGAGES investigators, a National Institute on Aging program officer, and a nonpartisan research organization (Westat). RESULTS: Regulatory tasks, including institutional review board approval, infrastructure establishment, and trial registration, were completed on schedule. A total of 117 patients were randomized, exceeding the target by 51. The EEG-guided protocol was successfully implemented, and a relevant effect on anesthetic practice was demonstrated (decrease in median age–adjusted minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration from 0.93 to 0.78 [P < .001] and increase in median proportion of zero EEG suppression time from 87% to 94% [P < .01]). Nearly all patients (115 of 117, 98.3%) were assessed for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method, and the delirium incidence was similar (28.1%; 95% CI, 20%–37%) to the estimate (25%) used for the sample size calculation. Good interrater reliability of delirium assessment was demonstrated (&kgr; = 0.94 [95% CI, 0.86–1]). Finally, 1-month follow-up vital status data were obtained for 96.9% of patients, with 85.7% of patients completing at least 1 survey. CONCLUSIONS: With the ENGAGES trial, we demonstrated that key milestones can be identified and progressively assessed during a pilot phase. Success in attaining appropriate milestones hypothetically predicts meaningful completion of a study, and can provide justification for proceeding beyond a pilot phase. The impact of this phased approach on return on investment and scientific yield requires additional study.

[1]  D. Blockley Making , 2020, The Hidden History of the Smock Frock.

[2]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful , 2016, PLoS medicine.

[3]  Bradley A. Fritz,et al.  Protocol for the Electroencephalography Guidance of Anesthesia to Alleviate Geriatric Syndromes (ENGAGES) study: a pragmatic, randomised clinical trial , 2016, BMJ Open.

[4]  S. Kheterpal,et al.  Reporting of Observational Research in ANESTHESIOLOGY: The Importance of the Analysis Plan. , 2016, Anesthesiology.

[5]  John P. A. Ioannidis,et al.  How to Make More Published Research True , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[6]  Michael S Lauer,et al.  Eliminating the "expensive" adjective for clinical trials. , 2014, American heart journal.

[7]  Eduardo L. Franco,et al.  Making Prospective Registration of Observational Research a Reality , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[8]  F. Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.

[9]  M. Lauer,et al.  Publication of trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Ralph B D'Agostino,et al.  The randomized registry trial--the next disruptive technology in clinical research? , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  W. Alexander The uphill path to successful clinical trials: keeping patients enrolled. , 2013, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[12]  E. Antman,et al.  Transforming clinical trials in cardiovascular disease: mission critical for health and economic well-being. , 2012, JAMA.

[13]  E. Vasilevskis,et al.  Epidemiology and risk factors for delirium across hospital settings. , 2012, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[14]  E. Peterson,et al.  The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start. , 2012, JAMA.

[15]  Prakash M. Nadkarni,et al.  Data standards for clinical research data collection forms: current status and challenges , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Shaun Treweek,et al.  Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability , 2009, Trials.

[17]  J. Lellouch,et al.  Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. , 1967, Journal of chronic diseases.

[18]  L. Rew,et al.  Enhancing intervention fidelity: a means of strengthening study impact. , 2006, Journal for specialists in pediatric nursing : JSPN.