Second generation bioenergy crops and climate change: a review of the effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and drought on water use and the implications for yield

Second‐generation, dedicated lignocellulosic crops for bioenergy are being hailed as the sustainable alternative to food crops for the generation of liquid transport fuels, contributing to climate change mitigation and increased energy security. Across temperate regions they include tree species grown as short rotation coppice and intensive forestry (e.g. Populus and Salix species) and C4 grasses such as miscanthus and switchgrass. For bioenergy crops it is paramount that high energy yields are maintained in order to drive the industry to an economic threshold where it has competitive advantage over conventional fossil fuel alternatives. Therefore, in the face of increased planting of these species, globally, there is a pressing need for insight into their responses to predicted changes in climate to ensure these crops are ‘climate proofed’ in breeding and improvement programmes. In this review, we investigate the physiological responses of bioenergy crops to rising atmospheric CO2 ([Ca]) and drought, with particular emphasis on the C3Salicaceae trees and C4 grasses. We show that while crop yield is predicted to rise by up to 40% in elevated [Ca], this is tempered by the effects of water deficit. In response to elevated [Ca] stomatal conductance and evapotranspiration decline and higher leaf–water potentials are observed. However, whole‐plant responses to [Ca] are often of lower magnitude and may even be positive (increased water use in elevated [Ca]). We conclude that rising [Ca] is likely to improve drought tolerance of bioenergy crop species due to improved plant water use, consequently yields in temperate environments may remain high in future climate scenarios.

[1]  D. Hibbs,et al.  Response of red alder seedlings to CO enrichment and water stress , 1995 .

[2]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Leaf and canopy responses to elevated CO2 in a pine forest under free-air CO2 enrichment , 2004, Oecologia.

[3]  Sven Halldin,et al.  Water-use efficiency of willow: Variation with season, humidity and biomass allocation , 1994 .

[4]  P. Pinter,et al.  CO2 enrichment increases water-use efficiency in sorghum , 2001 .

[5]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Sap flux in pure aspen and mixed aspen-birch forests exposed to elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide and ozone. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[6]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Water flux in a hybrid poplar stand. , 1994, Tree physiology.

[7]  S. Allen,et al.  Water use of poplar clones grown as short-rotation coppice at two sites in the United Kingdom. , 1997 .

[8]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C(3) plants. , 2004, Plant biology.

[9]  G. Katul,et al.  Hydrologic balance in an intact temperate forest ecosystem under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration , 2002 .

[10]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest , 1999 .

[11]  J. Dutoit The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2007 .

[12]  W. Arp Effects of source‐sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 , 1991 .

[13]  L. H. Allen,et al.  Growth at elevated CO(2) delays the adverse effects of drought stress on leaf photosynthesis of the C(4) sugarcane. , 2009, Journal of plant physiology.

[14]  D. Lawlor,et al.  Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP , 1999, Nature.

[15]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration: a synthesis. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[16]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Water Use Efficiency and Biomass Partitioning of Three Different Miscanthus Genotypes with Limited and Unlimited Water Supply , 2000 .

[17]  D. Ellsworth CO2 enrichment in a maturing pine forest: are CO2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? , 1999 .

[18]  S. Idso,et al.  Interactive Effects of Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Drought on Wheat , 2006 .

[19]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Effects of CO2 Enrichment on Four Poplar Clones. II. Leaf Surface Properties , 1990 .

[20]  P. Pinter,et al.  Elevated atmospheric CO2 improved Sorghum plant water status by ameliorating the adverse effects of drought , 2001 .

[21]  G. Katul,et al.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere , 2001, Nature.

[22]  M. Gribskov,et al.  The Genome of Black Cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray) , 2006, Science.

[23]  F. Woodward,et al.  Drought—CO2 interactions in trees observations and mechanisms , 1996 .

[24]  R. E. Dickson,et al.  Stomatal and non - stomatal limitation to photosynthesis in two trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides , 2001 .

[25]  A. Rogers,et al.  The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[26]  F. I. Woodward,et al.  Stomatal numbers are sensitive to increases in CO2 from pre-industrial levels , 1987, Nature.

[27]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  E. Hansen Irrigating short rotation intensive culture hybrid poplars , 1988 .

[29]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Photosynthetic acclimation of Pinus taeda (loblolly pine) to long‐term growth in elevated pCO2 (FACE) , 2002 .

[30]  J. Coleman,et al.  Photosynthetic down-regulation in Larrea tridentata exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2: Interaction with drought under glasshouse and field (FACE) exposure , 1998 .

[31]  A. Raschi,et al.  Responses of two Populus clones to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration in the field. , 1999 .

[32]  G. Taylor,et al.  Defining leaf traits linked to yield in short-rotation coppice Salix , 2004 .

[33]  B. Drake,et al.  MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2? , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[34]  Maria Manuela Chaves,et al.  Effects of Water Deficits on Carbon Assimilation , 1991 .

[35]  T. Volk,et al.  Morphological traits of 30 willow clones and their relationship to biomass production. , 2005 .

[36]  P. Pinter,et al.  Photosynthesis and conductance of spring-wheat leaves: field response to continuous free-air atmospheric CO2 enrichment , 1998 .

[37]  R. Thomas,et al.  No photosynthetic down‐regulation in sweetgum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) after three years of CO2 enrichment at the Duke Forest FACE experiment , 2001 .

[38]  E. P. McDonald,et al.  Tropospheric O(3) compromises net primary production in young stands of trembling aspen, paper birch and sugar maple in response to elevated atmospheric CO(2). , 2005, The New phytologist.

[39]  Claus Buschmann Plants and Microclimate — A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology, 2nd edition, H.G. Jones. Cambridge University Press (1992), 428 pp., (ISBN 0-521-42524-7). Price: 19.95 Pounds. , 1993 .

[40]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Increased leaf area expansion of hybrid poplar in elevated CO2. From controlled environments to open-top chambers and to FACE. , 2001, Environmental pollution.

[41]  C. Körner,et al.  Elevated CO2 reduces sap flux in mature deciduous forest trees , 2003, Oecologia.

[42]  J. Flexas,et al.  Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress , 2006 .

[43]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[44]  M. B. Kirkham,et al.  Photosynthesis of a C3 grass and a C4 grass under elevated CO2 , 1992 .

[45]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  The likely impact of rising atmospheric CO2 on natural and managed Populus: a literature review. , 2001, Environmental Pollution.

[46]  F. Dohleman,et al.  Will photosynthesis of maize (Zea mays) in the US Corn Belt increase in future [CO2] rich atmospheres? An analysis of diurnal courses of CO2 uptake under free‐air concentration enrichment (FACE) , 2004 .

[47]  J. Pereira,et al.  How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[48]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  The Blue Revolution, Drop by Drop, Gene by Gene , 2008, Science.

[49]  S. Pallardy,et al.  Biomass production physiology and soil carbon dynamics in short-rotation-grown Populus deltoides and P. deltoides × P. nigra hybrids , 2009 .

[50]  Mark Stitt,et al.  The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: the physiological and molecular background , 1999 .

[51]  A. Knapp,et al.  Water vapour fluxes and their impact under elevated CO2 in a C4‐tallgrass prairie , 1997 .

[52]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf gas exchange responses of 13 prairie grassland species to elevated CO2 and increased nitrogen supply , 2001 .

[53]  J. Pereira,et al.  Understanding plant responses to drought - from genes to the whole plant. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[54]  K. P. Beckett,et al.  Identifying QTL for yield in UK biomass poplar. , 2001 .

[55]  C. Calfapietra,et al.  Carbon partitioning to mobile and structural fractions in poplar wood under elevated CO2 (EUROFACE) and N fertilization , 2006 .

[56]  Brandon d. Moore,et al.  The biochemical and molecular basis for photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2 , 1999 .

[57]  D. Clark,et al.  The hydrological impacts of energy crop production in the UK. Final report , 2004 .

[58]  P. Reich,et al.  Do species and functional groups differ in acquisition and use of C, N and water under varying atmospheric CO2 and N availability regimes? : a field test with 16 grassland species , 2001 .

[59]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation. , 2003, Tree physiology.

[60]  Christian Körner,et al.  Water savings in mature deciduous forest trees under elevated CO2 , 2007 .

[61]  S. Long,et al.  Review Tansley Review , 2022 .

[62]  N. E. Miller,et al.  Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  P. De Angelis,et al.  Effects of elevated (CO2) on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters , 1999 .

[64]  S. Long,et al.  What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[65]  F. Miglietta,et al.  Leaf area is stimulated in Populus by free air CO2 enrichment (POPFACE), through increased cell expansion and production , 2001 .

[66]  D. Lawlor Limitation to photosynthesis in water-stressed leaves: stomata vs. metabolism and the role of ATP. , 2002, Annals of Botany.

[67]  B. Gielen,et al.  Leaf area dynamics in a closed poplar plantation under free-air carbon dioxide enrichment. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[68]  G. Taylor,et al.  Elevated CO2 and tree root growth: contrasting responses in Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus petraea and Pinus sylvestris. , 1998, The New phytologist.

[69]  F. Berninger,et al.  Photosynthetic responses of Populus przewalski subjected to drought stress , 2006, Photosynthetica.

[70]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Stomatal conductance and not stomatal density determines the long-term reduction in leaf transpiration of poplar in elevated CO2 , 2005, Oecologia.

[71]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2on woody plants , 1994 .

[72]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[73]  E. P. McDonald,et al.  Tropospheric O3 compromises net primary production in young stands of trembling aspen, paper birch and sugar maple in response to elevated atmospheric CO2 , 2005 .

[74]  P. Nilsson,et al.  The genetics and genomics of the drought response in Populus. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[75]  S. Long,et al.  Can fast-growing plantation trees escape biochemical down-regulation of photosynthesis when grown throughout their complete production cycle in the open air under elevated carbon dioxide? , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[76]  C. Nietch,et al.  Increased growth efficiency of Quercus alba trees in a CO2 -enriched atmosphere. , 1995, The New phytologist.

[77]  R. Betts,et al.  Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records , 2006, Nature.

[78]  K. Boote,et al.  Rice responses to drought under carbon dioxide enrichment. 1. Growth and yield , 1997 .

[79]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Woody biomass production during the second rotation of a bio‐energy Populus plantation increases in a future high CO2 world , 2006 .

[80]  A. Rogers,et al.  Photosynthesis, Productivity, and Yield of Maize Are Not Affected by Open-Air Elevation of CO2 Concentration in the Absence of Drought1[OA] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[81]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Comparative field water relations of three Mediterranean shrub species co-occurring at a natural CO(2) vent. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[82]  R. Thomas,et al.  Reduced stomatal conductance in sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) sustained over long‐term CO2 enrichment , 2004 .

[83]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Interactive effects of elevated [CO2] and drought on cherry (Prunus avium) seedlings II. Photosynthetic capacity and water relations , 1999 .

[84]  C. Körner Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[85]  A. Condon,et al.  Breeding for high water-use efficiency. , 2004, Journal of experimental botany.

[86]  G. Taylor Populus: arabidopsis for forestry. Do we need a model tree? , 2002, Annals of botany.

[87]  K. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity of stomatal and canopy conductance to elevated CO2 concentration - interacting variables and perspectives of scale. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[88]  S. M. Bunn,et al.  Water use of a bioenergy plantation increases in a future high CO2 world , 2009 .

[89]  S. Long,et al.  Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance responses of poplars to free-air CO2 enrichment (PopFACE) during the first growth cycle and immediately following coppice. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[90]  R. Norby,et al.  CO2 Fertilization: When, Where, How Much? , 2007 .

[91]  C. Körner,et al.  Responses of deciduous forest trees to severe drought in Central Europe. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[92]  R. Siegwolf,et al.  Carbon Flux and Growth in Mature Deciduous Forest Trees Exposed to Elevated CO2 , 2005, Science.

[93]  K. Openshaw A review of Jatropha curcas: an oil plant of unfulfilled promise☆ , 2000 .

[94]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology , 1998, Oecologia.

[95]  M. Navas,et al.  Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2 : on winners, losers and functional groups. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[96]  C. Körner,et al.  Carbon and water fluxes in a calcareous grassland under elevated CO2 , 1997 .

[97]  S. Long,et al.  Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO2 Concentrations , 2006, Science.

[98]  A. Rogers,et al.  Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. , 2004, Annual review of plant biology.

[99]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2– do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? , 2004 .

[100]  M B Jones,et al.  Comparative responses to water stress in stay-green, rapid- and slow senescing genotypes of the biomass crop, Miscanthus. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[101]  J. Knox,et al.  Mapping the walls of the kingdom: the view from the horsetails. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[102]  S. Allen,et al.  Transpiration from coppiced poplar and willow measured using sap-flow methods. , 1998 .

[103]  D. Tissue,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 enrichment increases growth and photosynthesis of Pinus taeda: a 4 year experiment in the field , 1997 .

[104]  F. Miglietta,et al.  Future atmospheric CO2 leads to delayed autumnal senescence , 2007 .

[105]  E. Cienciala,et al.  Water use efficiency of short-rotation Salix viminalis at leaf, tree and stand scales. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[106]  Ian Shield,et al.  Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[107]  M. Lukac,et al.  Production, turnover and mycorrhizal colonization of root systems of three Populus species grown under elevated CO2 (POPFACE). , 2003 .

[108]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Leaf and canopy responses to elevated CO2 in a pine forest under free-air CO2 enrichment , 1995, Oecologia.

[109]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Three years of free‐air CO2 enrichment (POPFACE) only slightly affect profiles of light and leaf characteristics in closed canopies of Populus , 2003 .

[110]  S. Wullschleger,et al.  Photosynthetic acclimation in trees to rising atmospheric CO2: A broader perspective , 1994, Photosynthesis Research.

[111]  R. Norby,et al.  Environmental and stomatal control of photosynthetic enhancement in the canopy of a sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) plantation during 3 years of CO2 enrichment , 2002 .

[112]  Jon D. Johnson,et al.  Water relations and gas exchange in poplar and willow under water stress and elevated atmospheric CO2. , 2002, Physiologia plantarum.

[113]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Interactive effects of elevated [CO2] and drought on cherry (Prunus avium) seedlings I. Growth, whole‐plant water use efficiency and water loss , 1999 .

[114]  J. Seemann,et al.  Sucrose cycling, Rubisco expression, and prediction of photosynthetic acclimation to elevated atmospheric CO2 , 1998, Plant, Cell & Environment.

[115]  P. Pinter,et al.  Elevated CO2 increases sorghum biomass under drought conditions , 2001 .

[116]  M. Battaglia,et al.  Photosynthetic responses of , 1998 .

[117]  L. Gomez,et al.  Sustainable liquid biofuels from biomass: the writing's on the walls. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[118]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World , 2007 .

[119]  P. Haldimann,et al.  Photosynthetic performance and water relations in young pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) trees during drought stress and recovery. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[120]  Alain Vavasseur,et al.  Guard cell metabolism and CO2 sensing. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[121]  W. J. Davies,et al.  ABA-based chemical signalling: the co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. , 2002, Plant, cell & environment.

[122]  A. Rogers,et al.  Is stimulation of leaf photosynthesis by elevated carbon dioxide concentration maintained in the long term? A test with Lolium perenne grown for 10 years at two nitrogen fertilization levels under Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) , 2003 .

[123]  R. E. Dickson,et al.  Tropospheric O3 moderates responses of temperate hardwood forests to elevated CO2: a synthesis of molecular to ecosystem results from the Aspen FACE project , 2003 .

[124]  S. Wand,et al.  Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta‐analytic test of current theories and perceptions , 1999 .

[125]  D. Ellsworth,et al.  Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO2 atmosphere , 1998 .

[126]  D. Dilcher,et al.  Paleoatmospheric Signatures in Neogene Fossil Leaves , 1993, Science.

[127]  R. Norby,et al.  Sap velocity and canopy transpiration in a sweetgum stand exposed to free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) , 2001 .

[128]  Tracy Lawson,et al.  Variations in stomatal density and index: implications for palaeoclimatic reconstructions , 1996 .

[129]  D. Tissue,et al.  Comparative responses of model C3 and C4 plants to drought in low and elevated CO2 , 1999 .

[130]  P. Pinter,et al.  Free-air CO2 enrichment effects on the energy balance and evapotranspiration of sorghum , 2004 .

[131]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Elevated CO2 and drought alter tissue water relations of birch (Betula populifolia Marsh.) seedlings , 1993, Oecologia.

[132]  T. Tschaplinski,et al.  Plant water relations at elevated CO2 -- implications for water-limited environments. , 2002, Plant, cell & environment.

[133]  Will photosynthesis of maize (Zea mays) in the US Corn Belt increase in future [CO2] rich atmospheres? An analysis of diurnal courses of CO2 uptake under free‐air concentration enrichment (FACE) , 2004 .

[134]  C. Osborne,et al.  Drought constraints on C4 photosynthesis: stomatal and metabolic limitations in C3 and C4 subspecies of Alloteropsis semialata. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[135]  J. Roden,et al.  The Effect of Elevated [CO2] on Growth and Photosynthesis of Two Eucalyptus Species Exposed to High Temperatures and Water Deficits , 1996, Plant physiology.