A conceptual framework for negotiating public involvement in municipal waste management decision-making in the UK.

[1]  Carla Tagliaferri,et al.  Life cycle assessment of conventional and two-stage advanced energy-from-waste technologies for municipal solid waste treatment , 2015 .

[2]  Kenisha Garnett,et al.  Effective dialogue: enhanced public engagement as a legitimising tool for municipal waste management decision-making. , 2014, Waste management.

[3]  Matthew Cotton,et al.  Shale Gas—Community Relations: NIMBY or Not? Integrating Social Factors Into Shale Gas Community Engagements , 2013 .

[4]  M. Sanó,et al.  Improving public engagement in ICZM: a practical approach. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Mary J. Newhart,et al.  Rulemaking vs. Democracy: Judging and Nudging Public Participation That Counts , 2012, Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law.

[6]  Richard Bull,et al.  The importance of context for effective public engagement: learning from the governance of waste , 2010 .

[7]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Functional‐dynamic public participation in technological decision‐making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories , 2010 .

[8]  C. O’faircheallaigh Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making , 2010 .

[9]  Paul Stephen Benneworth,et al.  The challenges for 21st century science : a review of the evidence base surrounding the value of public engagement by scientists , 2009 .

[10]  Jason Chilvers Critical studies of public engagement in science and the environment: Workshop report , 2009 .

[11]  Judith Petts,et al.  Public engagement to build trust: false hopes? , 2008 .

[12]  Richard Bull,et al.  Social learning from public engagement: dreaming the impossible? , 2008 .

[13]  J. Morphet Modern Local Government , 2007 .

[14]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students , 2007 .

[15]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  Towards Analytic‐deliberative Forms of Risk Governance in the UK? Reflecting on Learning in Radioactive Waste , 2007 .

[16]  Rjg Raymond Opdenakker Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research , 2006 .

[17]  N. S. Leksmono,et al.  Assessment of the relationship between industrial and traffic sources contributing to air quality objective exceedences: a theoretical modelling exercise , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  A. Bryman Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2006 .

[19]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[20]  J. Creighton The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions Through Citizen Involvement , 2005 .

[21]  Judith Petts,et al.  Barriers to participation and deliberation in risk decisions: evidence from waste management , 2004 .

[22]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Citizens and specialists deliberate options for managing the UK's legacy intermediate and high level radio-active waste: A report of the Deliberative Mapping Trial, June-July 2004. , 2004 .

[23]  J. Eyles,et al.  Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[24]  Christopher Snary,et al.  Risk Communication and the Waste-to-energy Incinerator Environmental Impact Assessment Process: A UK Case Study of Public Involvement , 2002 .

[25]  Michel Pimbert,et al.  Prajateerpu: a Citizens Jury / Scenario Workshop on Food and Farming Futures for Andhra Pradesh , 2002 .

[26]  Maureen H. McDonough,et al.  Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making , 2001 .

[27]  Judith Petts,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deliberative Processes: Waste Management Case-studies , 2001 .

[28]  Y. Rydin,et al.  Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital , 2000 .

[29]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  Renewing Local Democracy? : The Modernisation Agenda in British Local Government , 2000 .

[30]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: Includes a 30-Year Retrospective , 1999 .

[31]  Ortwin Renn A Model for an Analytic−Deliberative Process in Risk Management , 1999 .

[32]  David Policansky,et al.  SCIENCE AND DECISION MAKING FOR WATER RESOURCES , 1998 .

[33]  R. Perhac,et al.  Comparative Risk Assessment: Where Does the Public Fit In? , 1998 .

[34]  Judith Petts,et al.  The public—expert interface in local waste management decisions: expertise, credibility and process , 1997 .

[35]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[36]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse , 1995 .

[37]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[38]  Frank N. Laird,et al.  Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making , 1993 .

[39]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1993 .

[40]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Institutional Incentives And Sustainable Development: Infrastructure Policies In Perspective , 1993 .

[41]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste , 1991, Science.

[42]  Daniel J. Fiorino Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[43]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[44]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[45]  Raphael G. Kasper,et al.  Perceptions of Risk and Their Effects on Decision Making , 1980 .