Use of geometry for spatial reorientation in children applies only to symmetric spaces.

Proponents of the geometric module hypothesis argue that following disorientation, many species reorient by use of macro-environment geometry. It is suggested that attention to the surface layout geometry of natural terrain features may have been selected for over evolutionary time due to the enduring and unambiguous location information it provides. Paradoxically, however, tests of the hypothesis have been exclusively conducted in symmetric (hence 'unnatural' and geometrically ambiguous) environments. The present series of studies examines reorientation by 18-month-3-year-old children in a rectangular versus irregular quadrilateral enclosure (Study 1), a rectangular versus irregular quadrilateral array (Study 2) and an isosceles versus irregular triangular array (Study 3). Children were successful in symmetric but not asymmetric environments, casting doubt on the functional argument for an empirical basis of the geometric module hypothesis.

[1]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  N. Burgess,et al.  Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Luca Tommasi,et al.  Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus) , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[5]  M A Good,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt navigation based on the shape of the environment. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Allen Cheung,et al.  The information content of panoramic images I: The rotational errors and the similarity of views in rectangular experimental arenas. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Almut Hupbach,et al.  Reorientation in a rhombic environment: No evidence for an encapsulated geometric module , 2005 .

[9]  G. Di Chiara,et al.  Cocaine and Amphetamine Increase Extracellular Dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens of Mice Lacking the Dopamine Transporter Gene , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Thinus-Blanc,et al.  A Study of Spatial Parameters Encoded During Exploration in Hamsters , 1987 .

[11]  T. McNamara,et al.  Layout geometry in the selection of intrinsic frames of reference from multiple viewpoints. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[13]  Jon Driver,et al.  Perception of symmetry and repetition within and across visual shapes: Part-descriptions and object-based attention , 2001 .

[14]  Simon Slavin,et al.  Detection of geometric, but not topological, spatial transformations in 6- to 12-month-old infants in a visual exploration paradigm. , 2005, Developmental psychobiology.

[15]  E. Spelke,et al.  Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space , 2001, Cognition.

[16]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Coding location in enclosed spaces: is geometry the principle? , 2007, Developmental science.

[17]  S. Gouteux,et al.  Reorientation in a small-scale environment by 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children , 2001 .

[18]  E. Spelke,et al.  Core Knowledge of Geometry in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2006, Science.

[19]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .

[20]  J. O'Keefe,et al.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. , 1971, Brain research.

[21]  J. Taube,et al.  Effects of repeated disorientation on the acquisition of spatial tasks in rats: dissociation between the appetitive radial arm maze and aversive water maze. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  K. Cheng.  A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[23]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[24]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  L. Hermer-Vazquez,et al.  Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks , 2001, Cognition.

[26]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: A comparison with rats , 1999 .

[27]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  What do rats learn about the geometry of object arrays? Tests with exploratory behavior. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  Laurie L Bloomfield,et al.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry , 2005, Biology Letters.

[29]  Marina Vasilyeva,et al.  Children's use of geometric information in mapping tasks. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  R. Muller,et al.  Further study of the control of place cell firing by intra‐apparatus objects , 1999, Hippocampus.

[31]  Does shape matter? Theoretical comment on Jones, Pearce, Davies, Good, and McGregor (2007). , 2007, Behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Reflections on geometry and navigation , 2005, Connect. Sci..

[33]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  LANDMARK USE BY NAVIGATING RATS (RATTUS NORVEGICUS) : CONTRASTING GEOMETRIC AND FEATURAL INFORMATION , 1998 .

[34]  Sean Duffy,et al.  Developing symbolic capacity one step at a time , 2008, Cognition.

[35]  Peter M. Jones,et al.  Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[36]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[37]  J Ward-Robinson,et al.  Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[38]  Janellen Huttenlocher,et al.  How toddlers represent enclosed spaces , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Background, But Not Foreground, Spatial Cues Are Taken as References for Head Direction Responses by Rat Anterodorsal Thalamus Neurons , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Sang Ah Lee,et al.  Children's use of geometry for reorientation. , 2008, Developmental science.

[41]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Children's Use of Landmarks: Implications for Modularity Theory , 2002, Psychological science.

[42]  J. Gavin Bremner,et al.  Use of cue configuration geometry for spatial orientation in human infants (Homo sapiens). , 2001 .

[43]  R. Muller,et al.  Failure of Centrally Placed Objects to Control the Firing Fields of Hippocampal Place Cells , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Peter L. Hurd,et al.  Growing in Circles , 2007 .