More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch.

Switching tasks prolongs response times, an effect reduced but not eliminated by active preparation. To explore the role of attentional selection of the relevant stimulus attribute in these task-switch costs, we measured eye fixations in participants cued to identify either a face or a letter displayed on its forehead. With only 200 ms between cue and stimulus onsets, the eyes fixated the currently relevant region of the stimulus less and the irrelevant region more on switch than on repeat trials, at stimulus onset and for 500 ms thereafter, in a pattern suggestive of delayed orientation of attention to the relevant region on switch trials. With 800 ms to prepare, both switch costs and inappropriate fixations were reduced, but on switch trials participants still tended (relative to repeat trials) to fixate the now-irrelevant region more at stimulus onset and to maintain fixation on, or refixate, the irrelevant region more during the next 500 ms. The size of this attentional persistence was associated with differences in performance costs between and within participants. We suggest that reorientation of attention is an important, albeit somewhat neglected and controversial, component of advance task-set reconfiguration and that the task-set inertia (or reactivation) to which many attribute the residual task-switch cost seen after preparation includes inertia in (or reactivation of) attentional parameters.

[1]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. , 2008, Psychological review.

[2]  A C Nobre,et al.  Components of attentional set-switching. , 2005, Experimental psychology.

[3]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The effects of recent practice on task switching. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  E. Crone,et al.  Neural evidence for dissociable components of task-switching. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  I. Koch,et al.  The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Guy A. Mizon,et al.  A brain‐potential study of preparation for and execution of a task‐switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task‐set control: a task‐switching investigation , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  B. Hommel,et al.  Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus–task bindings in task-shift costs , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[14]  N. Meiran Modeling cognitive control in task-switching , 2000, Psychological research.

[15]  G. Logan,et al.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  N. Meiran Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[17]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  R De Jong,et al.  An intention-activation account of residual switch costs , 2000 .

[19]  A. Allport,et al.  Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs” , 2000, Psychological research.

[20]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Eye movements reveal dynamics of task control. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Yoav Kessler,et al.  Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching , 2008, Psychological research.

[22]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Between-Task Competition and Cognitive Control in Task Switching , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Limitations in advance task preparation: Switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same—different comparisons , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[26]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Latency of sequential eye movements: implications for reading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching , 2000 .

[31]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[32]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Amelia R Hunt,et al.  Eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration , 2002, Memory & cognition.