Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of extended suprathreshold vibratory stimulation on the sensitivity of slowly adapting type 1 (SA1), rapidly adapting (RA), and Pacinian (PC) afferents. To that end, an algorithm was developed to track afferent absolute (I0) and entrainment (I1) thresholds as they change over time. We recorded afferent responses to periliminal vibratory test stimuli, which were interleaved with intense vibratory conditioning stimuli during the adaptation period of each experimental run. From these measurements, the algorithm allowed us to infer changes in the afferents' sensitivity. We investigated the stimulus parameters that affect adaptation by assessing the degree to which adaptation depends on the amplitude and frequency of the adapting stimulus. For all three afferent types, I0 and I1 increased with increasing adaptation frequency and amplitude. The degree of adaptation seems to be independent of the firing rate evoked in the afferent by the conditioning stimulus. In the analysis, we distinguished between additive adaptation (in which I0 and I1 shift equally) and multiplicative effects (in which the ratio I1/I0 remains constant). RA threshold shifts are almost perfectly additive. SA1 threshold shifts are close to additive and far from multiplicative (I1 threshold shifts are twice the I0 shifts). PC shifts are more difficult to classify. We used an integrate-and-fire model to study the possible neural mechanisms. A change in transducer gain predicts a multiplicative change in I0 and I1 and is thus ruled out as a mechanism underlying SA1 and RA adaptation. A change in the resting action potential threshold predicts equal, additive change in I0 and I1 and thus accounts well for RA adaptation. A change in the degree of refractoriness during the relative refractory period predicts an additional change in I1 such as that observed for SA1 fibers. We infer that adaptation is caused by an increase in spiking thresholds produced by ion flow through transducer channels in the receptor membrane. In a companion paper, we describe the time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery for SA1, RA, and PC fibers.

[1]  Pankaj Sah,et al.  Ca2+-activated K+ currents in neurones: types, physiological roles and modulation , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  Werner R. Loewenstein,et al.  II. Post-Tetanic Potentiation and Depression of Generator Potential in a Single Non-Myelinated Nerve Ending , 1959, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  T. Gasser,et al.  In Vitro Studies , 1992 .

[4]  C. Erxleben.  Calcium influx through stretch-activated cation channels mediates adaptation by potassium current activation. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[5]  R T Verrillo,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a triplex system of cutaneous mechanoreception. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[6]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances frequency discrimination. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  The depression of the receptor potential in Pacinian corpuscles , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  M. Hollins,et al.  Perceived intensity of vibrotactile stimuli: the role of mechanoreceptive channels. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[9]  A. Freeman,et al.  Cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey: temporal discharge patterns evoked by vibration, and a receptor model , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation enhances amplitude discrimination. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[12]  Mark Hollins,et al.  Vebrotactile adaptation of a RA system: A psychophysical analysis , 1996 .

[13]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effects of sensory adaptation on the form of the psychophysical magnitude function for cutaneous vibration. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  A. Freeman,et al.  A model accounting for effects of vibratory amplitude on responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in macaque monkey , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Calcium inflow of hamster Merkel cells in response to hyposmotic stimulation indicate a stretch activated ion channel , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  J. Chubbuck.  Small motion biological stimulator , 1966 .

[17]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Hahn Jf,et al.  Low-frequency vibrotactile adaptation. , 1968 .

[19]  K. O. Johnson,et al.  Reconstruction of population response to a vibratory stimulus in quickly adapting mechanoreceptive afferent fiber population innervating glabrous skin of the monkey. , 1974, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  B. Whitsel,et al.  Time-dependence of SI RA neuron response to cutaneous flutter stimulation , 2003, Somatosensory & motor research.

[21]  Atsuko Mizuno,et al.  Localization of mechanosensitive channel TRPV4 in mouse skin , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  M. Rowe,et al.  Neural mechanisms in vibrotactile adaptation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds. , 1977, Sensory processes.

[26]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Mechanisms underlying somatosensory cortical dynamics: I. In vivo studies. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  M. Takeda,et al.  Effects of gadolinium and tetrodotoxin on the response of slowly adapting type I mechanoreceptors to mechanical stimulation in frog dorsal skin , 2003, Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS.

[28]  B. Berglund,et al.  Adaptation and Recovery in Vibrotactile Perception , 1970, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  J. Hahn.  Vibrotactile adaptation and recovery measured by two methods. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  M. Hollins,et al.  Adaptation-induced enhancement of vibrotactile amplitude discrimination: the role of adapting frequency. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Mechanisms underlying somatosensory cortical dynamics: II. In vitro studies. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  J F Hahn.  Low-frequency vibrotactile adaptation. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Selective adaptation of vibrotactile thresholds. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[34]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Stability of rapidly adapting afferent entrainment vs responsivity. , 2000, Somatosensory & motor research.

[35]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effects of vibrotactile adaptation on the perception of stimuli of varied intensity. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.