Patterns of collaboration in four scientific disciplines of the Turkish collaboration network

Scientific collaboration networks, as a prototype of complex evolving networks, are studied in many aspects of their structure and evolving characteristics. The organizing principles of these networks also vary in different scientific disciplines, demonstrating that each discipline has specific connecting rules. Retrieving the co-authorship data from the ISI Web of Science, we constructed networks of four disciplines (engineering, mathematics, physics and surgery) as a subset of the Turkish scientific collaboration network spanning 33 years’ data. To provide a comparative perspective on the network topologies, we studied some statistical and topological properties such as the number of authors, degree distributions, authors per paper and papers per author histograms and distributions. These properties yield that the rapid growth of high education in Turkey (i.e. doubling of the number of universities and students within the last decade) had boosted the number of publications and increased the level of collaborations in the scientific collaboration networks. We showed the occurrence of Matthew effect in career longevity distributions, and also outlined the Heaps’ law relation in the scaling of the collaborations as well. We outlined the prominent properties of each subset, while the similarities and deviations from the interdisciplinary networks are also evaluated.

[1]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[2]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Marcelo Kuperman,et al.  Effects of immunization in small-world epidemics , 2001, cond-mat/0109273.

[4]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[5]  Theo P. van der Weide,et al.  A formal derivation of Heaps' Law , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[6]  M. Tomassini,et al.  Empirical analysis of the evolution of a scientific collaboration network , 2007 .

[7]  Woo-Sung Jung,et al.  Quantitative and empirical demonstration of the Matthew effect in a study of career longevity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Evolution and Structure of the Internet: A Statistical Physics Approach , 2004 .

[9]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[10]  Michael J Gagen,et al.  Accelerating Networks , 2005, Science.

[11]  Luis Enrique Correa da Rocha,et al.  Size dependent word frequencies and translational invariance of books , 2009, ArXiv.

[12]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[13]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Characterizing the Community Structure of Complex Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  H. S. Heaps,et al.  Information retrieval, computational and theoretical aspects , 1978 .

[15]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[16]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Languages cool as they expand: Allometric scaling and the decreasing need for new words , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[17]  İlker Türker,et al.  Scientific collaboration network of Turkey , 2013 .

[18]  M. Perc Evolution of cooperation on scale-free networks subject to error and attack , 2009, 0902.4661.

[19]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Two Regimes in the Frequency of Words and the Origins of Complex Lexicons: Zipf’s Law Revisited* , 2001, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[20]  Yuen Ren Chao,et al.  Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology , 1950 .

[21]  M. BONITZ,et al.  Characteristics and impact of the matthew effect for countries , 1997, Scientometrics.

[22]  M E Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[24]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Growth and structure of Slovenia's scientific collaboration network , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[25]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Immunization of complex networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Spreading of cooperative behaviour across interdependent groups , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[28]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks , 2009, Nature.

[29]  R Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet. , 2001, Physical review letters.