Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial
暂无分享,去创建一个
Volker Klauss | Ganesh Manoharan | Emanuele Barbato | Andreas Baumbach | Bernard De Bruyne | A. Baumbach | V. Klauss | T. Engstrøm | K. Oldroyd | E. Barbato | B. Bruyne | W. Fearon | N. Pijls | P. Tonino | G. Manoharan | P. MacCarthy | William F Fearon | Pim A L Tonino | Nico H J Pijls | Thomas Engstrøm | Keith G Oldroyd | Philip A MacCarthy | M. Veer | Lokien X van Nunen | Frederik M Zimmermann | Peter N Ver Lee | Marcel van't Veer | F. Zimmermann | L. X. V. Nunen | P. N. Lee
[1] P. Serruys,et al. Unrestricted randomised use of two new generation drug-eluting coronary stents: 2-year patient-related versus stent-related outcomes from the RESOLUTE All Comers trial , 2011, The Lancet.
[2] D. Berman,et al. Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2003, Circulation.
[3] U. Siebert,et al. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study. , 2007, American heart journal.
[4] D. Berman,et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.
[5] Antonio Colombo,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.
[6] William Wijns,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[7] Nikola Jagic,et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.
[8] Uwe Siebert,et al. Economic Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease , 2010, Circulation.
[9] Guido Germano,et al. Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.
[10] L. Shaw,et al. Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[11] Nikola Jagic,et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[12] Sankey V. Williams,et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] D. Watson,et al. Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.
[14] U. Siebert,et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.
[15] Guido Germano,et al. Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. , 2011, European heart journal.
[16] Helmut Baumgartner,et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[17] Uwe Siebert,et al. Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyFractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study , 2010 .
[18] D. Berman,et al. Predicting outcome in the COURAGE trial (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation): coronary anatomy versus ischemia. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[19] Jing Li,et al. Long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided vs. angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice. , 2013, European heart journal.
[20] Gregg W Stone,et al. Everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[21] B. De Bruyne,et al. Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.