When Cognitive Biases Lead to Business Process Management Issues

There is a broad consensus that design decision making is important for Business Process Management success. Despite many business process design approaches and practices that are available, the quality of business process analysis and design relies heavily on human factors. Some of these factors concern cognitive biases. In this paper, we explore the role of cognitive biases in four key issues regarding the design-time phases of the business process management lifecycle. We outline some research directions that may help us understand and improve the effects of cognitive biases in the design-related practices of business process management.

[1]  N. Epley,et al.  The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic , 2006, Psychological science.

[2]  Gideon Keren,et al.  Cognitive Aids and Debiasing Methods: CAN Cognitive Pills Cure Cognitive Ills? , 1990 .

[3]  David Arnott,et al.  Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  Antony Tang,et al.  Decision making in software architecture , 2016, J. Syst. Softw..

[5]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World , 2000 .

[6]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Business process architectures: overview, comparison and framework , 2016, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Hans van Vliet,et al.  What makes software design effective , 2010 .

[8]  Jonathan Evans In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Onur Demirörs,et al.  Plural: A decentralized business process modeling method , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Best practices in business process redesign: validation of a redesign framework , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[11]  Christoph Burger,et al.  Biased Evaluation of Abstracts Depending on Topic and Conclusion: Further Evidence of a Confirmation Bias Within Scientific Psychology , 2010 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[13]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Reengineering in Australia: factors affecting success , 1998, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Improving Business Processes: Does Anybody have an Idea? , 2015, BPM.

[15]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Major Issues in Business Process Management: An Expert Perspective , 2007 .

[16]  Onur Demirörs,et al.  Business Process Modeling Pluralized , 2013, S-BPM ONE.

[17]  Irit Hadar,et al.  The role of domain knowledge in requirements elicitation via interviews: an exploratory study , 2012, Requirements Engineering.

[18]  Chad Saunders,et al.  Cognitive heuristics in software engineering applying and extending anchoring and adjustment to artifact reuse , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[19]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[20]  Rafael Capilla,et al.  In Two Minds: How Reflections Influence Software Architecture Design Thinking: how reflections influence software design thinking , 2016 .

[21]  Egon Börger,et al.  Subject-Oriented Process Analysis , 2012 .

[22]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics , 2005 .

[24]  Ayse Basar Bener,et al.  An analysis of the effects of company culture, education and experience on confirmation bias levels of software developers and testers , 2010, 2010 ACM/IEEE 32nd International Conference on Software Engineering.