Comparing Pedestrian Navigation Methods in Virtual Reality and Real Life

Mobile navigation apps are among the most used mobile applications and are often used as a baseline to evaluate new mobile navigation technologies in field studies. As field studies often introduce external factors that are hard to control for, we investigate how pedestrian navigation methods can be evaluated in virtual reality (VR). We present a study comparing navigation methods in real life (RL) and VR to evaluate if VR environments are a viable alternative to RL environments when it comes to testing these. In a series of studies, participants navigated a real and a virtual environment using a paper map and a navigation app on a smartphone. We measured the differences in navigation performance, task load and spatial knowledge acquisition between RL and VR. From these we formulate guidelines for the improvement of pedestrian navigation systems in VR like improved legibility for small screen devices. We furthermore discuss appropriate low-cost and low-space VR-locomotion techniques and discuss more controllable locomotion techniques.

[1]  Morten Fjeld,et al.  Map Navigation Using a Wearable Mid-air Display , 2015, MobileHCI.

[2]  James P. Bliss,et al.  The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Administering Spatial Navigation Training to Firefighters , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Martin Pielot,et al.  Tactile Wayfinder: Comparison of Tactile Waypoint Navigation with Commercial Pedestrian Navigation Systems , 2010, Pervasive.

[4]  Lucy Johnston,et al.  An investigation of road crossing in a virtual environment. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Mark T. Bolas,et al.  Making small spaces feel large: infinite walking in virtual reality , 2015, SIGGRAPH Emerging Technologies.

[7]  Ryan P. McMahan,et al.  Interaction Fidelity: The Uncanny Valley of Virtual Reality Interactions , 2016, HCI.

[8]  Maximilian Schirmer,et al.  Shoe me the Way: A Shoe-Based Tactile Interface for Eyes-Free Urban Navigation , 2015, MobileHCI.

[9]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Human Factors of Wayfinding in Navigation , 2006 .

[10]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[11]  Massimiliano Masullo,et al.  Preliminary studies on the relation between the audio-visual cues' perception and the approaching speed of electric vehicles , 2013 .

[12]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  StripeMaps: Improving Map-based Pedestrian Navigation for Smartwatches , 2015, MobileHCI.

[13]  Charles J Duffy,et al.  Detecting navigational deficits in cognitive aging and Alzheimer disease using virtual reality , 2008, Neurology.

[14]  Bernard N'Kaoua,et al.  Use of virtual reality for spatial knowledge transfer: effects of passive/active exploration mode in simple and complex routes for three different recall tasks , 2008, VRST '08.

[15]  Chris North,et al.  Information-rich virtual environments: theory, tools, and research agenda , 2003, VRST '03.

[16]  Ryan P. McMahan Exploring the Effects of Higher-Fidelity Display and Interaction for Virtual Reality Games , 2011 .

[17]  Jesper Kjeldskov,et al.  Is It Worth the Hassle? Exploring the Added Value of Evaluating the Usability of Context-Aware Mobile Systems in the Field , 2004, Mobile HCI.

[18]  Lesley Strawderman,et al.  Efficacy of virtual reality in pedestrian safety research. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  Charlotte Magnusson,et al.  A real-world study of an audio-tactile tourist guide , 2012, Mobile HCI.

[20]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  A Pedestrian Simulator for Urban Crossing Scenarios , 2016 .

[21]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Pedestrian simulators for traffic research: State of the art and future of a motion lab , 2018 .

[22]  Rudy Darken,et al.  The omni-directional treadmill: a locomotion device for virtual worlds , 1997, UIST '97.

[23]  Antonio Krüger,et al.  Acquisition of spatial knowledge in location aware mobile pedestrian navigation systems , 2006, Mobile HCI.

[24]  Daniel C. Cliburn,et al.  Dynamic landmark placement as a navigation aid in virtual worlds , 2007, VRST '07.

[25]  Christian Kray,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Field- and Lab-Based User Studies for Location-Based Services , 2014, LBS.

[26]  W. Bles,et al.  Motion sickness: only one provocative conflict? , 1998, Brain Research Bulletin.

[27]  Xavier Servantie,et al.  Using the Landmark–Route–Survey Framework to Evaluate Spatial Knowledge Obtained From Synthetic Vision Systems , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[28]  Steve Pettifer,et al.  Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[29]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Midair displays: exploring the concept of free-floating public displays , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  William E. Marsh,et al.  Representation of impossible worlds in the cognitive map , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[31]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Pedestrian navigation with degraded GPS signal: investigating the effects of visualizing position uncertainty , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[32]  Dirk Wenig,et al.  Suspended Walking: A Physical Locomotion Interface for Virtual Reality , 2013, ICEC.