Variation Thresholds for Extinction and Their Implications for Conservation Strategies

We examine the degree to which fitting simple dynamic models to time series of population counts can predict extinction probabilities. This is both an active branch of ecological theory and an important practical topic for resource managers. We introduce an approach that is complementary to recently developed techniques for estimating extinction risks (e.g., diffusion approximations) and, like them, requires only count data rather than the detailed ecological information available for traditional population viability analyses. Assuming process error, we use four different models of population growth to generate snapshots of population dynamics via time series of the lengths commonly available to ecologists. We then ask to what extent we can identify which of several broad classes of population dynamics is evident in the time series snapshot. Along the way, we introduce the idea of “variation thresholds,” which are the maximum amount of process error that a population may withstand and still have a specified probability of surviving for a given length of time. We then show how these thresholds may be useful to both ecologists and resource managers, particularly when dealing with large numbers of poorly understood species, a common problem faced by those designing biodiversity reserves.

[1]  H. G. Andrewartha,et al.  Population Ecology , 2020, Nature.

[2]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single‐species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations , 1991 .

[3]  J. Craig Viable populations for conservation , 1990 .

[4]  Robin McCleery,et al.  Environmental Stochasticity and Extinction Risk in a Population of a Small Songbird, the Great Tit , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[5]  T. Burkey Metapopulation Extinction in Fragmented Landscapes: Using Bacteria and Protozoa Communities as Model Ecosystems , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[6]  A. Veitch,et al.  The Effect of an Upper Limit to Population Size on Persistence Time , 1995 .

[7]  C. Mann,et al.  A Species' Fate, By the Numbers , 1999, Science.

[8]  R. Lande Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[9]  C. Walters,et al.  Are age-structured models appropriate for catch-effort data? , 1985 .

[10]  P. Bayliss Population dynamics of magpie geese in relation to rainfall and density: implications for harvest models in a fluctuating environment , 1989 .

[11]  Ray Hilborn,et al.  The Influence of Model Structure on Conclusions about the Viability and Harvesting of Serengeti Wildebeest , 1997 .

[12]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Predicting the outcome of competition using experimental data : Maximum likelihood and bayesian approaches , 1996 .

[13]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  ALEX: A model for the viability analysis of spatially structured populations , 1995 .

[14]  W. Fagan WEAK INFLUENCES OF INITIAL CONDITIONS ON METAPOPULATION PERSISTENCE TIMES , 1999 .

[15]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management , 1998 .

[16]  M. Mangel,et al.  Four Facts Every Conservation Biologists Should Know about Persistence , 1994 .

[17]  Eli Meir,et al.  Will Observation Error and Biases Ruin the Use of Simple Extinction Models? , 2000 .

[18]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics in ecology , 1998 .

[19]  Brian Dennis,et al.  Estimation of Growth and Extinction Parameters for Endangered Species , 1991 .

[20]  E. Leigh,et al.  The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  S. Karlin,et al.  A second course in stochastic processes , 1981 .

[22]  Michael Turelli,et al.  Stochastic Community Theory: A Partially Guided Tour , 1986 .

[23]  R. Lande,et al.  Extinction dynamics of age-structured populations in a fluctuating environment. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[25]  M. Shaffer Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[26]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  A Stage‐Based Population Model for Loggerhead Sea Turtles and Implications for Conservation , 1987 .

[27]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1999 .

[28]  M. Mangel,et al.  A simple direct method for finding persistence times of populations and application to conservation problems. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  M. Boyce Population Viability Analysis , 1992 .

[30]  N S Goel,et al.  On the extinction of a colonizing species. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[31]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Risk assessment in conservation biology , 1993 .

[32]  R. Nisbet,et al.  POPULATION PERSISTENCE TIME: ESTIMATES, MODELS, AND MECHANISMS , 1997 .

[33]  John H. Lawton,et al.  More time means more variation , 1988, Nature.

[34]  W. Schaffer,et al.  Chaos reduces species extinction by amplifying local population noise , 1993, Nature.

[35]  P J den Boer,et al.  Spreading of risk and stabilization of animal numbers. , 1968, Acta biotheoretica.