Exploring the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency: The influence of local and list-wide prime relatedness

Stimulus quality and word frequency produce additive effects in lexical decision performance, whereas the semantic priming effect interacts with both stimulus quality and word frequency effects. This pattern places important constraints on models of visual word recognition. In Experiment 1, all three variables were investigated within a single speeded pronunciation study. The results indicated that the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency were dependent upon prime relatedness. In particular, an additive effect of stimulus quality and word frequency was found after related primes, and an interactive effect was found after unrelated primes. It was hypothesized that this pattern reflects an adaptive reliance on related prime information within the experimental context. In Experiment 2, related primes were eliminated from the list, and the interactive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency found following unrelated primes in Experiment 1 reverted to additive effects for the same unrelated prime conditions. The results are supportive of a flexible lexical processor that adapts to both local prime information and global list-wide context.

[1]  D. Plaut,et al.  More modeling but still no stages: Reply to Borowsky and Besner , 2006 .

[2]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention , 1979 .

[3]  David A Balota,et al.  Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  K. Stanovich.  TOWARD AN INTERACTIVE-COMPENSATORY MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF READING FLUENCY , 1980 .

[5]  Derek Besner,et al.  Reading aloud: evidence for contextual control over lexical activation. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  M. Masson,et al.  Prime Validity Affects Masked Repetition Priming: Evidence for an Episodic Resource Account of Priming , 2001 .

[8]  Derek Besner,et al.  On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[10]  M. Masson,et al.  Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  J. Cattell,et al.  V.—MENTAL TESTS AND MEASUREMENTS , 1890 .

[12]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: no challenge for CDP+. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon? , 1990 .

[14]  Derek Besner,et al.  Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007). , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  R A Abrams,et al.  Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[17]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[18]  David A. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity , 2009 .

[19]  K. Stanovich,et al.  The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a two-process theory. , 1981 .

[20]  Derek Besner,et al.  On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition , 1997 .

[21]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[22]  Michael E. J. Masson,et al.  A Retrospective View of Masked Priming : Toward a Unified Account of Masked and Long-Term Repetition Priming , 2003 .

[23]  D. Plaut,et al.  Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[24]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[25]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[26]  D. Besner,et al.  Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  J. Jonides,et al.  On the Cost and Benefit of Cost and Benefit , 1984 .

[28]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .

[29]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[31]  Derek Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: evidence for global and local control over semantic feedback. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Ron Borowsky,et al.  Parallel distributed processing and lexical-semantic effects in visual word recognition: are a few stages necessary? , 2006, Psychological review.

[33]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. , 2007, Psychological review.

[34]  James H. Neely,et al.  When Word Identification Gets Tough, Retrospective Semantic Processing Comes to the Rescue. , 2012 .

[35]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[36]  Derek Besner,et al.  Neighbourhood density, word frequency, and spelling-sound regularity effects in naming: similarities and differences between skilled readers and the Dual Route Cascaded Computational model. , 2004, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[37]  K. Stanovich,et al.  On priming by a sentence context. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  François Vachon,et al.  Impaired semantic processing during task-set switching: evidence from the N400 in rapid serial visual presentation. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[39]  M. Masson,et al.  Masked Repetition Priming of Words and Nonwords: Evidence for a Nonlexical Basis for Priming , 1997 .

[40]  James H. Neely,et al.  When target degradation does and does not enhance semantic context effects in word recognition. , 1995 .

[41]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[42]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Early and late selection in unconscious information processing. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  David A. Balota,et al.  Attentional Control and Flexible Lexical Processing : Explorations of the Magic Moment of Word Recognition , 2007 .

[44]  S. Sternberg,et al.  The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: tests of three alternatives , 1993 .

[45]  M. Masson,et al.  Beyond binary judgments: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[46]  Patrick A. O’Connor,et al.  Fast trial pacing in a lexical decision task reveals a decay of automatic semantic activation. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[47]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task , 1975 .

[48]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[49]  David A. Balota,et al.  Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming , 2008 .

[50]  S. Sternberg.  The discovery of processing stages , 1969 .

[51]  D. Besner,et al.  Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  M. Coltheart,et al.  The quarterly journal of experimental psychology , 1985 .

[54]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  distributional analyses of semantic priming , 2008 .

[55]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Predicting semantic priming at the item level , 2008 .

[56]  C. A. Becker.  Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  Glen E Bodner,et al.  Repetition proportion biases masked priming of lexical decisions , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[58]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Models of visual word recognition: When obscuring the stimulus yields a clearer view. , 1992 .

[60]  R. Job,et al.  Levels of representation in word processing , 1995 .

[61]  Additivity of factor effects in reading tasks is still a challenge for computational models: Reply to Ziegler, Perry, and Zorzi (2009). , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.