Qualitative and quantitative analyses of anatomists’ research: evaluation of multidisciplinarity and trends in scientific production

Our aim was to evaluate the impact of anatomy as a multidisciplinary area and to identify trends in research by anatomists over time. Data from three main sources were analyzed: SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR), using the number of total documents as indicator; MEDLINE (PubMed) database (1898 through October 2012), using the keyword “anatomy” in the “affiliation” field; and the Journal Citation Report (JCR), gathering impact factor and quartile data. The number of publications by anatomists increased between 1898 and 1941, followed by a reduction until 1961 and then by a marked rise to reach 36,686 between 2002 and 2012. After 1941, anatomists began to publish in journals from JCR categories other than “Anatomy & Morphology”, especially after 1962. Between 2007 and 2012, only 22.23 % of articles by anatomists in JCR-indexed journals were in the “Anatomy & Morphology” area and 77.77 % in journals from other categories; 58 % of their articles were in journals in the first and second quartiles. The contribution of anatomists to scientific knowledge is high quality and considerably greater than indicated by the SJR database. This input is especially relevant in the Neurosciences, Cell Biology, and Biology categories. In addition, more than two-thirds of manuscripts by anatomists appear in JCR-ranked publications, and more than half in the top two quartiles of the impact factor ranking. Our results show that the scientific production of anatomists has improved the quantity and quality of multi-disciplinary scientific activity in different knowledge areas.

[1]  I. Holloway.  A-Z of qualitative research in healthcare , 2008 .

[2]  E. Garfield.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[3]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[4]  Ignasi Brunet Icart,et al.  Sociología de las organizaciones , 2007 .

[5]  Carl T. Bergstrom.  Eigenfactor Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals , 2007 .

[6]  Julian D. Olden,et al.  Not So Fast: Inflation in Impact Factors Contributes to Apparent Improvements in Journal Quality , 2010 .

[7]  G. Lippi,et al.  The impact factor and journals in laboratory medicine. , 2009, Clinical laboratory.

[8]  S. Vinther,et al.  Impact factor trends for general medical journals: non-English-language journals are lacking behind. , 2012, Swiss medical weekly.

[9]  Giovanni Motta,et al.  Journal impact factors , 1995, Nature.

[10]  W. Parak.  Characterizing the multidisciplinarity of nanoscience research. , 2010, ACS nano.

[11]  N. Busygina,et al.  Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research , 2014 .

[12]  M. Teresa.,et al.  Estudio del flujo de información sobre taxanos en el tratamiento sistémico del cáncer de mama , 2011 .

[13]  Centro de Estudios de Opinión Compilación Ceo.  SOCIOLOGÍA DE LAS ORGANIZACIONES , 2009 .

[14]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[15]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Qualitative methods for assessing health care. , 1994, Quality in health care : QHC.

[16]  G. Harding,et al.  Qualitative methods: beyond the cookbook. , 1998, Family practice.

[17]  K S Joseph,et al.  Quality of impact factors of general medical journals , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  J. Camí.  Evaluación de la investigación biomédica , 2001 .

[19]  Wolfgang G. Stock.  The inflation of impact factors of scientific journals. , 2009, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[20]  Vroni Retzer,et al.  Towards objectivity in research evaluation using bibliometric indicators – A protocol for incorporating complexity , 2009 .

[21]  C. Gómez,et al.  Indicadores bibliométricos: origen, aplicación, contradicción y nuevas propuestas , 2005 .

[22]  E. Garfield,et al.  Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making , 1992 .

[23]  S. Derry,et al.  Interdisciplinary Collaboration : An Emerging Cognitive Science , 2014 .

[24]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: an Emergent or Engineered Process? , 2005 .

[25]  M. Falagas,et al.  Temporal Trends in the Impact Factor of European versus USA Biomedical Journals , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  E. Garfield.  Journal impact factor: a brief review. , 1999, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[27]  Alma Whiteley,et al.  Rigour in qualitative research , 2002 .

[28]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.