Exploring the Effects of Digital Note Taking on Student Comprehension of Science Texts

This study investigated the effects of text notes and voice notes on the comprehension of science texts by fifth grade students. The study was conducted to determine whether digital note taking was an effective reading strategy, and whether one form of digital note taking was more effective than the other. Results revealed that general education students made statistically significant gains for both science texts: Cells, and Heredity. For Cells, the voice notes group outperformed their text note peers at a level that was statistically significant. Special education students also made greater test gains using voice notes rather than text notes, and this difference was statistically significant for short-answer tests on Heredity. Additional analyses revealed diverse note taking strategies, which appeared consistent across media.

[1]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Assessing Reading Skill With a Think-Aloud Procedure and Latent Semantic Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Mark A. Horney,et al.  Computer-Based Study Strategies For Students With Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[3]  Lynne Anderson-Inman.  Supported eText: Literacy Scaffolding for Students with Disabilities , 2009 .

[4]  M. Saunders,et al.  Maximizing Student Performance in Summary Writing: Managing Cognitive Load , 1991 .

[5]  Lynne Anderson-Inman,et al.  The electrotext project: hypertext reading patterns of middle school students , 1994 .

[6]  K. Squire,et al.  Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground , 2004 .

[7]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Deep‐Level Comprehension of Science Texts: The Role of the Reader and the Text , 2005 .

[8]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[9]  Debra L. Long,et al.  Thinking aloud: Telling a story about a story , 1996 .

[10]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[11]  George E. Newell,et al.  The Uses of Function: James Britton’s Category System and Research on Writing , 1989 .

[12]  Mar Mateos,et al.  Reading and writing to learn in secondary education: online processing activity and written products in summarizing and synthesizing tasks , 2008 .

[13]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Conscious understanding during comprehension , 1996 .

[14]  Nancy Nelson Spivey,et al.  The Constructivist Metaphor: Reading, Writing, and the Making of Meaning , 1996 .

[15]  M Gajria,et al.  The Effects of Summarization Instruction on Text Comprehension of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1992, Exceptional children.

[16]  Joseph M. Sencibaugh.  Meta-Analysis of Reading Comprehension Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: Strategies and Implications. , 2005 .

[17]  Brenton Muñoz,et al.  Typing versus thinking aloud when reading: Implications for computer-based assessment and training tools , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[18]  Chris Dede,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Scaling Up , 2005 .

[19]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Enhancing Main Idea Comprehension for Students with Learning Problems , 2000 .

[20]  Danielle S McNamara,et al.  iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[21]  Mark A. Horney,et al.  Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations , 2007 .

[22]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  The Teaching of Reading Comprehension according to the Model of Generative Learning. , 1981 .

[23]  R. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  The Effects of School-Based Writing-to-Learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[24]  Paul Whitney,et al.  Think-Aloud Protocols and the Study of Comprehension , 1996 .

[25]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[26]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation‐model construction , 1996 .

[27]  Raymond W. Kulhavy,et al.  Notetaking and depth of processing , 1979 .

[28]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Strategic processing during comprehension. , 1999 .

[29]  Mark A. Horney,et al.  SUPPORTED TEXT IN ELECTRONIC READING ENVIRONMENTS , 1999 .