Dynamic load response of the in vitro lumbar spine in flexion

Tue biomechanical response of the in vitro lumbar motion segment (functional spinal unit, FSU) under a dynamic (transient) flexion-shear load was detennined. Tue load was transferred to the specimen by a padded pendulum and simulated a flexion-distraction injury, a so called lap seat-belt injury. Tue load response of the specimen was measured with a force and moment transducer, and the motions were detennined with high speed photography. Two series of tests were made with 10 specimens in each, with two different load pulses: one moderate pulse (mean acceleration 2.5 g, duration 150 ms) and one severe pulse (mean acceleration 8 g, durarion 250 ms). Tue resuJts showed that the moderate load pulse caused initial flexion-distraction injuries at a mean bending moment of 1 13 Nm and a mean shear force of 346 N. Tue maximum flexion angulation attained during the loading sequence was 14 •. Tue severe load pulse caused evident signs of failure or total rupture of the segments at a mean bending moment of 1 5 1 Nm and a mean shear force of 481 N. Tue flexion angulation just before failure was 19·. A statistically significant correlation (r>0.7, p<0.05) was found between the load response and the height of the segment, the load response and the lateral disc diameter, and the load response and the bone mineral content (BMC) in the venebrae. Comparisons were made with previous established thresholds for st.atic flcxion-shear loading. Tue results indicated that thresholds for initial and ultimate flexion-distraction injury respectively are in the same range for static and transient loading conditions.

[1]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical spine mechanics as a function of transection of components. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J R Dehner,et al.  Seatbelt injuries of the spine and abdomen. , 1971, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[3]  B. Roos,et al.  Dual photon absorptiometry in lumbar vertebrae. I. Theory and method. , 1974, Acta radiologica: therapy, physics, biology.

[4]  Albert I. King,et al.  The Role of Articular Facets During +Gz Acceleration , 1974 .

[5]  P Lövsund,et al.  Ultimate strength of the lumbar spine in flexion--an in vitro study. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  V K Goel,et al.  Load sharing among spinal elements of a motion segment in extension and lateral bending. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  Dynamic characteristics of the human spine during -Gx acceleration , 1978 .

[8]  Y. K. Liu,et al.  Mechanical response of the lumbar intervertebral joint under physiological (complex) loading. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  A B Schultz,et al.  Mechanical properties of lumbar spine motion segments under large loads. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  M. Adams,et al.  The Resistance to Flexion of the Lumbar Intervertebral Joint , 1980, Spine.

[11]  John A. Roebuck,et al.  Engineering Anthropometry Methods , 1975 .

[12]  F Denis,et al.  The Three Column Spine and Its Significance in the Classification of Acute Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries , 1983, Spine.

[13]  E. Greenbaum,et al.  Flexion fracture of the lumbar spine due to lap-type seat belts. , 1970, California medicine.

[14]  B Aldman,et al.  The thoracolumbar crush fracture. An experimental study on instant axial dynamic loading: the resulting fracture type and its stability. , 1984, Spine.

[15]  T. Keller,et al.  Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compressive loading , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  R Cheng,et al.  Biodynamics of the living human spine during -gx impact acceleration , 1979 .

[17]  F. Hartmann,et al.  Biomechanical Properties of Human Intervertebral Discs Subjected to Axial Dynamic Compression: A Comparison of Lumbar and Thoracic Discs , 1984, Spine.

[18]  A. Schultz,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Human Lumbar Spine Motion Segments—Part I: Responses in Flexion, Extension, Lateral Bending, and Torsion , 1979 .

[19]  P Loevsund,et al.  Methods for studying effects on the spine under different loads , 1987 .