The tensions of defining and developing thought leadership within knowledge-intensive firms

Purpose A major part of knowledge management for knowledge-intensive firms such as professional service firms is the increasing focus on thought leadership. Despite being a well-known term, it is poorly defined and analysed in the academic and practitioner literature. The aim of this article is to answer three questions. First, what is thought leadership? Second, what tensions exist when seeking to create thought leadership in knowledge-based organisations? Third, what further research is needed about thought leadership? The authors call for cross-disciplinary and academic–practitioner approaches to understanding the field of thought leadership. Design/methodology/approach The authors review the academic and practitioner literature on thought leadership to provide a rich oversight of how it is defined and can be understood by separating inputs, creation processes and outcomes. The authors also draw on qualitative data from 12 in-depth interviews with senior leaders of professional service firms. Findings Through analysing and building on previous understandings of the concept, the authors redefine thought leadership as follows: “Knowledge from a trusted, eminent and authoritative source that is actionable and provides valuable solutions for stakeholders”. The authors find and explore nine tensions that developing thought leadership creates and propose a framework for understanding how to engage with thought leadership at the industry/macro, organisational/meso and individual/micro levels. The authors propose a research agenda based on testing propositions derived from new theories to explain thought leadership, including leadership, reducing risk, signalling quality and managing social networks, as well as examining the suggested ways to resolve different tensions. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, they are the first to separate out thought leadership from its inputs, creation processes and outcomes. The authors show new organisational paradoxes within thought leadership and show how they can play out at different levels of analysis when implementing a thought leadership strategy. This work on thought leadership is set in a relatively under-explored context for knowledge management researchers, namely, knowledge-intensive professional service firms.

[1]  James S. Denford.  Building knowledge: developing a knowledge-based dynamic capabilities typology , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[3]  B. Avolio,et al.  . , 2005, The Leadership Quarterly.

[4]  Marianne W. Lewis.  Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[5]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[6]  C. Pearce.  The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  Alice Lam.  Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework , 2000 .

[8]  L. Crevani,et al.  Relational leadership , 2015 .

[9]  Stephen Chen,et al.  Global dispersion of offshore service providers: an information processing perspective , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[10]  Lynn A. Isabella.  Evolving Interpretations as a Change Unfolds: How Managers Construe Key Organizational Events , 1990 .

[11]  J. West,et al.  Open Innovation: The Next Decade , 2014 .

[12]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[13]  Rahul Singh,et al.  Building Thought Leadership Through Business-to-Business Social Media Engagement at Infosys , 2013, MIS Q. Executive.

[14]  Nemanja Spasojevic,et al.  Klout score: Measuring influence across multiple social networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data).

[15]  Fabio Cassia,et al.  Establishing thought leadership through social media in B2B settings: effects on customer relationship performance , 2019, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.

[16]  F. Reichheld.  The one number you need to grow. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[17]  Roger S. White,et al.  Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know , 2001 .

[18]  Marion Brivot,et al.  Controls of Knowledge Production, Sharing and Use in Bureaucratized Professional Service Firms , 2011 .

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[20]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  Innovation in services , 1997 .

[21]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[22]  Joseph A. Horvath,et al.  Is Knowing the Tax Code All It Takes to Be a Tax Expert? On the Development of Legal Expertise , 1999 .

[23]  Martin Lockett,et al.  Knowledge intensive organisations: on the frontiers of knowledge management: Guest editorial , 2016 .

[24]  Kasia Zalewska-Kurek,et al.  Understanding researchers' strategic behaviour in knowledge production: a case of social science and nanotechnology researchers , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[25]  Martin Lockett,et al.  Guest editorial: Knowledge intensive organisations: on the frontiers of knowledge management , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  A. Cunliffe,et al.  Relational leadership , 2011 .

[27]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[28]  Charlene Zietsma,et al.  Social Innovation: Integrating Micro, Meso, and Macro Level Insights From Institutional Theory , 2018, Business & Society.

[29]  Marcia B. Cohen.  Perceptions of Power in Client/Worker Relationships , 1998 .

[30]  M. McCrimmon.  Thought leadership: a radical departure from traditional, positional leadership , 2005 .

[31]  Thomas Maak,et al.  Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement, and the Emergence of Social Capital , 2007 .

[32]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Client Co-Production in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services , 2002 .

[33]  Joseph Osuji,et al.  Using Grounded theory as a method of inquiry : advantages and disadvantages , 2014 .

[34]  D. I. Sensuse,et al.  Mental health knowledge management: critical success factors and strategy of implementation , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[35]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Paradoxical leader behavior in long-term corporate development: Antecedents and consequences , 2019, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

[36]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  Identity, intended image, construed image, and gnreputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology , 2006 .

[37]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and the Theory of Fields* , 2001 .

[38]  Thomas Carlyle,et al.  On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History , 1840 .

[39]  T. Hahn,et al.  The Ontology of Organizational Paradox: A Quantum Approach , 2019 .

[40]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[41]  R. Boland,et al.  Knowledge Representations and Knowledge Transfer , 2001 .

[42]  Eric Knight,et al.  Managing Exploration and Exploitation Paradoxes in Creative Organizations , 2015 .

[43]  S. Winter,et al.  The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited , 1982 .

[44]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Paradoxical Leadership to Enable Strategic Agility , 2014 .

[45]  Ray Pawson,et al.  RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[46]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  How do collaboration and investments in knowledge management affect process innovation in services? , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[47]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[48]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward , 2016 .

[49]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[50]  L. Flynn,et al.  Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scales , 1996 .

[51]  Tahir Hameed,et al.  Reconciling ambiguity with interaction: implementing formal knowledge strategies in a knowledge-intensive organization , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[52]  J. Scouller.  The Three Levels of Leadership: How to Develop Your Leadership Presence, Knowhow and Skill , 2011 .

[53]  Ferran Vendrell-Herrero,et al.  Knowledge management competences, exporting and productivity: uncovering African paradoxes , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[54]  L. Hughes.  Exploring Leadership: Individual, Organizational, & Societal Perspectives , 2012 .

[55]  T. C. Melewar,et al.  Measuring reputation in global markets—A comparison of reputation measures’ convergent and criterion validities , 2013 .

[56]  Donald Lange,et al.  Organizational Reputation: A Review , 2011 .

[57]  M. Uhl‐Bien,et al.  Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing , 2006 .

[58]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[59]  D. Ketchen,et al.  New Frontiers of the Reputation—Performance Relationship: Insights From Multiple Theories , 2010 .

[60]  William S. Harvey,et al.  Seizing the Ethical High Ground: Ethical Reputation Building in Corrupt Environments , 2017 .

[61]  Fang Wu,et al.  A Persistence Paradox , 2009, First Monday.

[62]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[63]  Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo,et al.  Different practices for open innovation: a context-based approach , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[64]  Dmitry Zhukov,et al.  How to measure trust: the percolation model applied to intra-organisational knowledge sharing networks , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[65]  Timothy Kuhn.  Negotiating the Micro-Macro Divide , 2012 .

[66]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Writing Narrative Literature Reviews , 1997, Review of General Psychology.

[67]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[68]  Eileen P. Kelly.  Thought Leaders: Insights on the Future of Business , 1998 .

[69]  Paul A. Swatman,et al.  Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research , 2000, ECIS.

[70]  M. Guerci,et al.  ‘Activists in a Suit’: Paradoxes and Metaphors in Sustainability Managers’ Identity Work , 2018 .

[71]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[72]  Timothy G. Pollock,et al.  Which of These Things Are Not Like the Others? Comparing the Rational, Emotional, and Moral Aspects of Reputation, Status, Celebrity, and Stigma , 2019, Academy of Management Annals.

[73]  K. Sudhir.  Editorial - The Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff and Efficiency in Knowledge Production , 2016, Mark. Sci..

[74]  Jeroen Kraaijenbrink,et al.  The team absorptive capacity triad: a configurational study of individual, enabling, and motivating factors , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[75]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Capital: Theory and Research , 2017 .

[76]  Jonathan Cox,et al.  Toward a Model of Shared Leadership and Distributed Influence in the Innovation Process: How Shared Leadership Can Enhance New Product Development Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2003 .

[77]  D. Strang,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas , 2019 .

[78]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  Open innovation based knowledge management implementation: a mediating role of knowledge management design , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[79]  James Faulconbridge,et al.  Stretching tacit knowledge beyond a local fix? Global spaces of learning in advertising professional service firms , 2006 .

[80]  Jennifer Washburn,et al.  The Kept University. , 2000 .

[81]  Luiz Moutinho,et al.  Risk Reduction in Purchasing Organisational Professional Services , 2003 .

[82]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings. , 1982 .

[83]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[84]  Amit V. Deokar,et al.  Understanding knowledge creation in the context of knowledge-intensive business processes , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[85]  M. Spence.  Job Market Signaling , 1973 .

[86]  Thomas Armbrüster,et al.  Bridging Uncertainty in Management Consulting: The Mechanisms of Trust and Networked Reputation , 2003 .

[87]  Davide Ravasi,et al.  The Formation of Organizational Reputation , 2018, Academy of Management Annals.

[88]  Kai Wing Chu,et al.  Leading knowledge management in a secondary school , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[89]  Heidi K. Gardner,et al.  When senior managers won’t collaborate , 2015 .

[90]  M. Polanyi.  The Logic of Tacit Inference , 1966, Philosophy.

[91]  Tuyet-Mai Nguyen,et al.  Motivation and knowledge sharing: a meta-analysis of main and moderating effects , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[92]  Namrata Malhotra,et al.  Heterogeneity in Professional Service Firms , 2009 .

[93]  James M. Barry,et al.  Operationalizing thought leadership for online B2B marketing , 2017, Industrial Marketing Management.

[94]  Ksenia O. Krylova,et al.  Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: the crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[95]  Les Coleman,et al.  Optimizing decisions using knowledge risk strategy , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[96]  Joseph Feller,et al.  Institutionalising information asymmetry: governance structures for open innovation , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[97]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity , 1993 .

[98]  Barbara Kellerman,et al.  Followership: How Followers Are Creating Change and Changing Leaders , 2008 .

[99]  Hui Lei,et al.  Determinants of innovation capability: the roles of transformational leadership, knowledge sharing and perceived organizational support , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[100]  Andrew von Nordenflycht.  What Is a Professional Service Firm? Toward a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2010 .

[101]  Alain Degenne.  Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[102]  S. Ivory,et al.  Managing Corporate Sustainability with a Paradoxical Lens: Lessons from Strategic Agility , 2018 .

[103]  Susan B. Grant,et al.  Classifying emerging knowledge sharing practices and some insights into antecedents to social networking: a case in insurance , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[104]  Apresentação Paulo Bastos Tigre.  Bengt-Åke Lundvall - Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation , 2009 .

[105]  Thomas Maak,et al.  Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society – A Relational Perspective , 2006 .

[106]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Rethinking the Knowledge-Based Organization , 2003 .

[107]  P. Hertog.  KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES AS CO-PRODUCERS OF INNOVATION , 2000 .

[108]  Antoaneta P. Petkova,et al.  Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation , 2005 .

[109]  Jinlian Luo,et al.  Antecedents and intervention mechanisms: a multi-level study of R&D team's knowledge hiding behavior , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[110]  William S. Harvey.  Strategies for conducting elite interviews , 2011 .

[111]  E. Rogers.  New Product Adoption and Diffusion , 1976 .

[112]  Bernardo Bertoldi,et al.  The role of a knowledge leader in a changing organizational environment. A conceptual framework drawn by an analysis of four large companies , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[113]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[114]  R. Raso.  Be a thought leader. , 2016, Nursing management.

[115]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Creativity from paradoxical experience: a theory of how individuals achieve creativity while adopting paradoxical frames , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[116]  G. Koch.  Intercultural Communication and Competence Research through the Lens of an Anthropology of Knowledge , 2009 .

[117]  V. Mitchell.  Organizational Risk Perception and Reduction: A Literature Review , 1995 .

[118]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[119]  Benita R. Dillard,et al.  Technology and Teaching: A Conversation among Faculty Regarding the Pros and Cons of Technology. , 2014 .

[120]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[121]  D. Maister.  Managing the Professional Service Firm , 1997 .

[122]  Ian Miles,et al.  Patterns of innovation in service industries , 2008, IBM Syst. J..

[123]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[124]  Lotte S. Luscher,et al.  Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox , 2008 .

[125]  M. Crossan.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[126]  J. Acton.  An Evaluation of Economists' Influence on Electric Utility Rate Reforms , 1982 .

[127]  V. Mitchell,et al.  Using Industrial Key Informants: Some Guidelines , 1994 .

[128]  Daeyeon Cho,et al.  How transactive memory systems relate to organizational innovation: the mediating role of developmental leadership , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[129]  H. Ernst,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: The Role of Technology Aggressiveness , 2009 .

[130]  William S. Harvey,et al.  Reputation and identity conflict in management consulting , 2017 .

[131]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing , 2011 .

[132]  A Sociometric Study of Influence in Southtown , 1947 .

[133]  Frank Figge,et al.  Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework , 2014 .

[134]  Peter M. Bican,et al.  Managing knowledge in open innovation processes: an intellectual property perspective , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[135]  L. Empson.  Fear of Exploitation and Fear of Contamination: Impediments to Knowledge Transfer in Mergers between Professional Service Firms , 2001 .

[136]  E. Rogers,et al.  LIVING RESEARCH METHODS OF MEASURING OPINION LEADERSHIP , 1962 .