The differences in pleasing value and learning performance among different groups using mobile augmented reality system for cultural environment learning

Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) has becomes more widely used and provides the great context of an immersive virtual learning environment. However, sometimes the learning effect is influenced by the pleasing value, which is always subjective and learning driven. In order to ensure a successful launch of the MAR cultural interactive learning tool, it is extremely important to predict the pleasing value of design alternatives based on the common language understood by students. For learners, in the learning process, the value of pleasure comes from the improvement of external emotional interest as well as internal cognitive interest that learners already have. This research will examine if students have problems with operating the MAR, and to understand whether they have pleasing value and a learning performance. Thus, this research has proposed a difference of visual perception and a construction for the evaluation of pleasing value as well as the culture of learning performance between media students and students in other majors. The research team has chosen different cultural temples in Shi-lin and Tam-sui in Taiwan using the MAR systems to evaluate the correctness and speed of the reaction in between the two groups represented as: the experimental group and the control group. The research objects will be the second year/sophomore studentsat Taipei University of Marine Technology. There were two classes with different majors and there were 35 students in each class. This research took one of the classes as the experimental group with “MAR empirical teaching in cultural and environmental learning” and other class will be the control group using the traditional teaching method. The result from the experiment and the ANCOVA analysis indicates: (1) Based on the results of experiments, the participants appreciated the MAR approach. The learning performance of the students did improve significantly via ACNOVA. (2) The experimental group has a more significant effect compared to the control group in the aspect from the four learning performance constructions: stylistic, cultural value, cultural characterization and innovation services. (3) Through the bi-variance statistical analysis (One-Way, ANOVA), there was a significant positive correlation between pleasing value and the improvement of post-learning interest in the experimental group. This research found that based on the exploration factor from that the results the interfaces were built on a mobile phone with a touch-screen can be a model for the effectiveness examination, It can also expand the MAR application scope by incorporating it into teaching.

[1]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  T. Saaty,et al.  Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks , 1986 .

[3]  Suzanne Hidi,et al.  Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. , 1988 .

[4]  Ming-Hui Huang,et al.  The Theory of Emotions in Marketing , 2001 .

[5]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A survey of augmented reality" Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments , 1997 .

[6]  D. Berlyne NOVELTY AND CURIOSITY AS DETERMINANTS OF EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOUR1 , 1950 .

[7]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Handheld AR for Collaborative Edutainment , 2006, ICAT.

[8]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  Usability with context-aware mobile applications:case studies and design guidelines , 2006 .

[9]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[10]  Yuh-Shyan Chen,et al.  A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[11]  L. Shulman Studies of the Inquiry Process; Inquiry Patterns of Students in Teacher-Training Programs. Final Report. , 1968 .

[12]  G. Loewenstein The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. , 1994 .

[13]  Shion Yeing Ooi Mobile augmented reality for smart pet , 2019 .

[14]  Patricia Morreale,et al.  Applications of Augmented Reality Systems in Education , 2010 .

[15]  Alan B. Craig Understanding Augmented Reality: Concepts and Applications , 2013 .

[16]  Sukhyun Lim,et al.  An augmented reality-based authoring tool for E-learning applications , 2011, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[17]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Augmenting Reality: A new paradigm for interacting with computers , 1996 .

[18]  Alan B. Craig Augmented Reality Concepts , 2013 .

[19]  Wac Performing Literature Review in Informal Learning with Technology Outside School , 2007 .

[20]  Alan B. Craig Mobile Augmented Reality , 2013 .

[21]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Tracking requirements for augmented reality , 1993, CACM.

[22]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[23]  Jean Bacon,et al.  Supporting interactive presentation for distributed multimedia applications , 2005, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[24]  Fei Liu,et al.  On the precision of third person perspective augmented reality for target designation tasks , 2017, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[25]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience , 1996 .