Physics-Based Foundation for Empirical Mode Decomposition

We study the correspondence between analytical and empirical slow-flow analyses. Given a sufficiently dense set of sensors, measured time series recorded throughout a mechanical or structural system contains all information regarding the dynamics of that system. Empirical mode decomposition is a useful tool for decomposing the measured time series in terms of intrinsic mode functions, which are oscillatory modes embedded in the data that fully reproduce the time series. The equivalence of responses of the analytical slow-flow models and the dominant intrinsic mode functions derived from empirical mode decomposition provides a physics-based theoretical foundation for empirical mode decomposition, which currently is performed formally in an ad hoc fashion. To demonstrate correspondence between analytical and empirical slow flows, we derive appropriate mathematical expressions governing the empirical slow flows and based on analyticity conditions. Several nonlinear dynamical systems are considered to demonstrate this correspondence, and the agreement between the analytical and empirical slow dynamics proves the assertion.

[1]  Norden E. Huang,et al.  Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition: a Noise-Assisted Data Analysis Method , 2009, Adv. Data Sci. Adapt. Anal..

[2]  Wenxian Yang,et al.  Interpretation of mechanical signals using an improved Hilbert-Huang transform , 2008 .

[3]  P. Pai Nonlinear vibration characterization by signal decomposition , 2007 .

[4]  N. Senroy,et al.  An Improved Hilbert–Huang Method for Analysis of Time-Varying Waveforms in Power Quality , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Ferdinand Verhulst,et al.  Singular perturbation methods for slow–fast dynamics , 2007 .

[6]  Yang Yu,et al.  The application of energy operator demodulation approach based on EMD in machinery fault diagnosis , 2007 .

[7]  D. M. McFarland,et al.  Toward a Fundamental Understanding of the Hilbert-Huang Transform in Nonlinear Structural Dynamics , 2006 .

[8]  Yuping Zhang,et al.  Hilbert-Huang Transform and Marginal Spectrum for Detection of Bearing Localized Defects , 2006, 2006 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[9]  R. Sharpley,et al.  Analysis of the Intrinsic Mode Functions , 2006 .

[10]  D. M. McFarland,et al.  Triggering mechanisms of limit cycle oscillations due to aeroelastic instability , 2005 .

[11]  Jacques Lemoine,et al.  Empirical mode decomposition: an analytical approach for sifting process , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[12]  Oleg Gendelman,et al.  Dynamics of coupled linear and essentially nonlinear oscillators with substantially different masses , 2005 .

[13]  P. Tse,et al.  An improved Hilbert–Huang transform and its application in vibration signal analysis , 2005 .

[14]  Robert H. King,et al.  Dynamic response of the Trinity River Relief Bridge to controlled pile damage: modeling and experimental data analysis comparing Fourier and Hilbert–Huang techniques , 2005 .

[15]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Ultrasonic signal identification by empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert transform , 2005 .

[16]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Complicated dynamics of a linear oscillator with a light, essentially nonlinear attachment , 2005 .

[17]  James F. Kaiser,et al.  The use of a masking signal to improve empirical mode decomposition , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[18]  Dejie Yu,et al.  Application of EMD method and Hilbert spectrum to the fault diagnosis of roller bearings , 2005 .

[19]  Alexander F. Vakakis,et al.  Irreversible Passive Energy Transfer in Coupled Oscillators with Essential Nonlinearity , 2005, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[20]  T. Le,et al.  Continuous wavelet transform for modal identification using free decay response , 2004 .

[21]  Gabriel Rilling,et al.  Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[22]  S. S. Shen,et al.  A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  N. Huang,et al.  System identification of linear structures based on Hilbert–Huang spectral analysis. Part 1: normal modes , 2003 .

[24]  Maria Q. Feng,et al.  A technique to improve the empirical mode decomposition in the Hilbert-Huang transform , 2003 .

[25]  Gabriel Rilling,et al.  On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms , 2003 .

[26]  Pierre Argoul,et al.  INSTANTANEOUS INDICATORS OF STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR BASED ON THE CONTINUOUS CAUCHY WAVELET ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[27]  Oleg Gendelman,et al.  Energy Pumping in Nonlinear Mechanical Oscillators: Part II—Resonance Capture , 2001 .

[28]  Oleg Gendelman,et al.  Energy pumping in nonlinear mechanical oscillators : Part I : Dynamics of the underlying Hamiltonian systems , 2001 .

[29]  Leonid I. Manevitch,et al.  Complex Representation of Dynamics of Coupled Nonlinear Oscillators , 1999 .

[30]  N. Huang,et al.  A new view of nonlinear water waves: the Hilbert spectrum , 1999 .

[31]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  C. Meunier,et al.  Multiphase Averaging for Classical Systems: With Applications To Adiabatic Theorems , 1988 .

[33]  C. Meunier,et al.  Multiphase Averaging for Classical Systems , 1988 .

[34]  A. Nayfeh Introduction To Perturbation Techniques , 1981 .

[35]  E. Bedrosian A Product Theorem for Hilbert Transforms , 1963 .