Abstract Airline maintenance operations affect the potential for flight delays and can also affect flight safety if signals of technical problems are missed or misinterpreted. In this paper, we use a probabilistic risk analysis model, represented by an influence diagram, to quantify the effect of an airline's maintenance policy on delays, cancellations and in-flight safety. The model represents the leading edge (LE) sub-system of a commercial passenger jet and consists of three tiers: (1) a set of management decision variables (e.g. the level of qualification of maintenance personnel); (2) a ground model linking policy decisions and flight delays; and (3) an in-flight model, linking policy decisions, maintenance quality and flight safety. To illustrate this model, we use data adapted (for confidentiality reasons) from a study of an existing airline. Clearly, the LE devices of an airplane are not among the most safety-critical and the risk of an accident due to poor maintenance is extremely small, but non-zero. The same model can be used for other, more critical parts of the aircraft to support maintenance policy decisions in which the trade-off between delays and safety may be more pronounced.
[1]
B. John Garrick,et al.
Recent Case Studies and Advancements in Probabilistic Risk Assessment
,
1984
.
[2]
Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.
PRA as a management tool: organizational factors and risk-based priorities for the maintenance of the tiles of the space shuttle orbiter
,
1993
.
[3]
S. Kaplan,et al.
On The Quantitative Definition of Risk
,
1981
.
[4]
Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
,
1974,
Science.
[5]
D M Murphy,et al.
The SAM framework: modeling the effects of management factors on human behavior in risk analysis.
,
1996,
Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[6]
Peter Gwynne.
Uncertainty in New York
,
2002
.
[7]
G. Apostolakis.
The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems.
,
1990,
Science.
[8]
Ross D. Shachter.
Evaluating Influence Diagrams
,
1986,
Oper. Res..
[9]
Ronald A. Howard,et al.
Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis
,
1989
.
[10]
Averill M. Law,et al.
Simulation Modeling and Analysis
,
1982
.