Effective Hamiltonian for cuprate superconductors derived from multiscale ab initio scheme with level renormalization

Three types (three-band, two-band, and one-band) of effective Hamiltonians for ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ and three-band effective Hamiltonian for ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ are derived by improving the constrained-$GW$ approximation combined with the self-interaction correction ($\mathrm{c}GW\ensuremath{-}\text{SIC}$) formulated by Hirayama et al. [Phys. Rev. B 98, 134501 (2018)]. The improved treatment of the interband Hartree energy in the present paper turns out to be crucially important, because the solution of the present improved Hamiltonian shows excellent agreement with the experimental results, for instance, for the charge gap (2 eV) and antiferromagnetic ordered moment $(0.6\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\text{B}})$ of the mother compound of ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$, in sharp contrast to the estimates by the previous Hamiltonian, 4.5 eV and $0.8\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\text{B}}$, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first simultaneous and quantitative reproduction of these quantities by $\mathit{ab}\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}\mathit{initio}$ methods without introducing adjustable parameters. We also predict that the Mott gap and the magnetic ordered moment for ${\mathrm{HgBa}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ is about 0.7 eV and $0.4\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{\text{B}}$, respectively, if the mother compound becomes available, indicating weaker electron correlations than ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$. Surprisingly, we find that while carriers are doped only in the highest antibonding band, only the Cu $3{d}_{{x}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{y}^{2}}$ (O $2p$) carriers look doped in the electron (hole) doped side around the zero doping in the atomic orbital basis, implying that the Mott-Hubbard (single-band) and charge transfer (three-band) descriptions are both correct. The obtained Hamiltonians will serve to further clarify the electronic structures of these copper oxide superconductors and to elucidate the superconducting mechanism in an ab initio fashion.

[1]  K. Müller,et al.  Possible highTc superconductivity in the Ba−La−Cu−O system , 1986 .

[2]  Takashi Miyake,et al.  Ab initio procedure for constructing effective models of correlated materials with entangled band structure , 2009, 0906.1344.

[3]  Satoshi Morita,et al.  mVMC - Open-source software for many-variable variational Monte Carlo method , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[4]  M. van Schilfgaarde,et al.  Adequacy of approximations in GW theory , 2006 .

[5]  Yusuke Nomura,et al.  Effective on-site interaction for dynamical mean-field theory , 2012, 1205.2836.

[6]  M. Imada,et al.  Origin of high- T c superconductivity in doped Hubbard models and their extensions: Roles of uniform charge fluctuations , 2013, 1306.1434.

[7]  Gernot J. Kraberger,et al.  Charge self-consistent many-body corrections using optimized projected localized orbitals , 2018, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[8]  Coexistence of, and Competition between, Superconductivity and Charge-Stripe Order in La 1.6-x Nd 0.4 Sr x CuO 4 , 1996, cond-mat/9608048.

[9]  H. Takagi,et al.  Direct phase-sensitive identification of a d-form factor density wave in underdoped cuprates , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. R. Norman,et al.  From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides , 2015, Nature.

[11]  M. Imada,et al.  Competition among various charge-inhomogeneous states and d-wave superconducting state in Hubbard models on square lattices , 2017, 1712.05490.

[12]  Y. Endoh,et al.  The effect of the heat treatments on the antiferromagnetism in La2CuO4-δ single crystals , 1987 .

[13]  F. Aryasetiawan,et al.  Dynamically screened Coulomb interaction in the parent compounds of hole-doped cuprates: Trends and exceptions , 2018, Physical Review B.

[14]  R. Jastrow Many-Body Problem with Strong Forces , 1955 .

[15]  Zhang,et al.  Lattice instability and high-Tc superconductivity in La2-xBaxCuO4. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[16]  M. Marezio,et al.  Superconductivity at 94 K in HgBa2Cu04+δ , 1993, Nature.

[17]  N. Brookes,et al.  Direct observation of charge order in underdoped and optimally doped Bi 2 ( Sr , La ) 2 CuO 6 + δ by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering , 2016, 1610.01823.

[18]  S. Sorella Generalized Lanczos algorithm for variational quantum Monte Carlo , 2000, cond-mat/0009149.

[19]  Competition between d -wave superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in the two-dimensional Hubbard model , 2006, cond-mat/0603227.

[20]  A. Damascelli,et al.  Broken translational and rotational symmetry via charge stripe order in underdoped YBa2Cu3O6+y , 2015, Science.

[21]  A. I. Lichtenstein,et al.  Frequency-dependent local interactions and low-energy effective models from electronic structure calculations , 2004 .

[22]  T. Miyake,et al.  Ab initio Studies of Magnetism in the Iron Chalcogenides FeTe and FeSe , 2015, 1505.03730.

[23]  Louie,et al.  Electron correlation in semiconductors and insulators: Band gaps and quasiparticle energies. , 1986, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[24]  T. Miyake,et al.  Low-energy effective Hamiltonians for correlated electron systems beyond density functional theory , 2015, 1511.03757.

[25]  Claudius Gros,et al.  Physics of Projected Wavefunctions , 1989 .

[26]  Hui-Hai Zhao,et al.  Variational Monte Carlo method for fermionic models combined with tensor networks and applications to the hole-doped two-dimensional Hubbard model , 2017, 1703.03537.

[27]  Takashi Miyake,et al.  Comparison of Ab initio Low-Energy Models for LaFePO, LaFeAsO, BaFe2As2, LiFeAs, FeSe, and FeTe , 2009, 0911.3705.

[28]  Andrea Damascelli,et al.  Resonant X-Ray Scattering Studies of Charge Order in Cuprates , 2015, 1509.03313.

[29]  T. Schmitt,et al.  Charge order and its connection with Fermi-liquid charge transport in a pristine high-Tc cuprate , 2014, Nature Communications.

[30]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional Hubbard model , 2016, Science.

[31]  Masatoshi Imada,et al.  Magnetic Properties of Ab initio Model of Iron-Based Superconductors LaFeAsO , 2010, 1006.4812.

[32]  T. Miyake,et al.  Derivation of static low-energy effective models by an ab initio downfolding method without double counting of Coulomb correlations: Application to SrVO 3 , FeSe, and FeTe , 2012, 1211.0597.

[33]  V. Anisimov,et al.  First principles electronic model for high-temperature superconductivity , 2002, cond-mat/0203117.

[34]  Hybertsen,et al.  Renormalization from density-functional theory to strong-coupling models for electronic states in Cu-O materials. , 1990, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[35]  E. M. Forgan,et al.  The microscopic structure of charge density waves in underdoped YBa2Cu3O6.54 revealed by X-ray diffraction , 2015, Nature Communications.

[36]  Kuroki Kazuhiko,et al.  Model-Mapped RPA for Determining the Effective Coulomb Interaction , 2017 .

[37]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Competing states in the t-J model: uniform D-wave state versus stripe state. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[38]  Christoph Friedrich,et al.  Effective Coulomb interaction in transition metals from constrained random-phase approximation , 2011, 1103.5593.

[39]  R. Comin,et al.  Ubiquitous Interplay Between Charge Ordering and High-Temperature Superconductivity in Cuprates , 2013, Science.

[40]  A. Georges,et al.  Self-consistency over the charge density in dynamical mean-field theory: A linear muffin-tin implementation and some physical implications , 2007, 0705.2161.

[41]  Hiroshi Eisaki,et al.  Commensurate 4a0-period charge density modulations throughout the Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x pseudogap regime , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Tajima,et al.  Optical spectra of La2-xSrxCuO4: Effect of carrier doping on the electronic structure of the CuO2 plane. , 1991, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[43]  B. Alder,et al.  THE GROUND STATE OF THE ELECTRON GAS BY A STOCHASTIC METHOD , 2010 .

[44]  R. Sakuma,et al.  Downfolded self-energy of many-electron systems. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[45]  A. Sandvik Finite-size scaling of the ground-state parameters of the two-dimensional Heisenberg model , 1997, cond-mat/9707123.

[46]  Masatoshi Imada,et al.  Ab initio effective Hamiltonians for cuprate superconductors , 2017, Physical Review B.

[47]  H. Hafermann,et al.  Superconductivity, antiferromagnetism and phase separation in the two-dimensional Hubbard model: A dual-fermion approach , 2014, 1410.1246.

[48]  Allen,et al.  Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[49]  M. Gutzwiller Effect of Correlation on the Ferromagnetism of Transition Metals , 1963 .

[50]  Yasushi Ishii,et al.  Generalization of the Iterative Perturbation Theory and Metal–Insulator Transition in Multi-Orbital Hubbard Bands , 2003 .

[51]  G. M. De Luca,et al.  Long-Range Incommensurate Charge Fluctuations in (Y,Nd)Ba2Cu3O6+x , 2012, Science.

[52]  M. Kastner,et al.  Doping dependence of the spatially modulated dynamical spin correlations and the superconducting-transition temperature in La 2-x Sr x CuO 4 , 1998 .

[53]  Phase separation and stripe formation in the two-dimensional t − J model: A comparison of numerical results , 1999, cond-mat/9907375.

[54]  Markus Aichhorn,et al.  Charge self-consistency in density functional theory combined with dynamical mean field theory: k -space reoccupation and orbital order , 2016, 1605.00545.

[55]  T. Kotani,et al.  Model-mapped random phase approximation to evaluate superconductivity in the fluctuation exchange approximation from first principles , 2019, Physical Review B.

[56]  G. Kotliar,et al.  Self consistent GW determination of the interaction strength: application to the iron arsenide superconductors , 2010, 1005.0885.

[57]  M. Kastner,et al.  Magnetic, transport, and optical properties of monolayer copper oxides , 1998 .

[58]  Takeo Fujiwara,et al.  Electronic structure of perovskite-type transition metal oxides La M O 3 ( M = Ti ∼ Cu ) by U + GW approximation , 2009 .

[59]  Takashi Miyake,et al.  Electronic structure calculation by first principles for strongly correlated electron systems , 2010, 1009.3851.