Rural co-working: New network spaces and new opportunities for a smart countryside

[1]  Jodi Oakman,et al.  Working in the digital economy: A systematic review of the impact of work from home arrangements on personal and organizational performance and productivity , 2022, PloS one.

[2]  Ya-Ning Chang,et al.  The Future of Work after COVID-19 from the Office to the Edge: Using the IT Industry as an Example , 2022, Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences.

[3]  Hideo Owan,et al.  Working from home and productivity under the COVID-19 pandemic: Using survey data of four manufacturing firms , 2021, PloS one.

[4]  L. Manning,et al.  Rural arts entrepreneurs’ placemaking – how ‘entrepreneurial placemaking’ explains rural creative hub evolution during COVID-19 lockdown , 2021, Local Economy.

[5]  G. Bosworth,et al.  How rural coworking hubs can facilitate well-being through the satisfaction of key psychological needs , 2021, Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit.

[6]  R. Florida,et al.  Critical Commentary: Cities in a post-COVID world , 2021, Urban studies.

[7]  M. Kilduff,et al.  Network Agency , 2021, Academy of Management Annals.

[8]  Darja Reuschke,et al.  A flash in the pan or a permanent change? The growth of homeworking during the pandemic and its effect on employee productivity in the UK , 2021, Inf. Technol. People.

[9]  B. Honig,et al.  Business planning by intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs under environmental uncertainty and institutional pressure , 2021 .

[10]  M. Feldman,et al.  Regional income disparities, monopoly and finance , 2020, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society.

[11]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Will Covid-19 Take the Air out of Silicon Valley? , 2020, Entrepreneur & Innovation Exchange.

[12]  Timo Ohnmacht,et al.  Relationships between coworking spaces and CO2 emissions in work-related commuting: first empirical insights for the case of Switzerland with regard to urban-rural differences , 2020, Environmental Research Communications.

[13]  C. Grant,et al.  Agile Working and Well-Being in the Digital Age , 2020 .

[14]  H. Overman,et al.  Will coronavirus cause a big city exodus? , 2020, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.

[15]  L. Townsend,et al.  Smart rural futures: Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution? , 2020, Journal of Rural Studies.

[16]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy , 2020, Annual Review of Sociology.

[17]  Peter Newman AO.  COVID, CITIES and CLIMATE: Historical Precedents and Potential Transitions for the New Economy , 2020, Urban Science.

[18]  Jonathan I. Dingel,et al.  How many jobs can be done at home? , 2020, Journal of Public Economics.

[19]  D. Roep,et al.  Exploring the transformative capacity of place-shaping practices , 2020, Sustainability Science.

[20]  J. Johns,et al.  ‘I have so little time […] I got shit I need to do’: Critical perspectives on making and sharing in Manchester’s FabLab , 2020 .

[21]  P. Mazur,et al.  CREDIBILITY AND CREATIVITY IN NETWORK SOCIETY , 2020 .

[22]  Capital Mobilization,et al.  Urban Resilience , 2020, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

[23]  J. Whalley,et al.  Infrastructure Provision on the Margins: An Assessment of Broadband Delivery UK , 2020, International Journal of Public Administration.

[24]  B. Slee.  Delivering on the Concept of Smart Villages – in Search of an Enabling Theory , 2019, European Countryside.

[25]  G. Bosworth,et al.  Commercial Counterurbanisation: A driving force in rural economic development , 2019, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space.

[26]  Mike Wright,et al.  The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes , 2019, Research Policy.

[27]  Colin Lorne.  The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city , 2019, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space.

[28]  F. Zhen,et al.  How Does Castells's The Rise of the Network Society Contribute to Research in Human Geography? A Citation Content and Context Analysis , 2019, The Professional Geographer.

[29]  Veronika Zavratnik,et al.  Living Labs for Rural Areas: Contextualization of Living Lab Frameworks, Concepts and Practices , 2019, Sustainability.

[30]  Gareth Loudon,et al.  Coworking in the digital economy: Context, motivations, and outcomes , 2019, Futures.

[31]  Stefania Fiorentino.  Different typologies of ‘co-working spaces’ and the contemporary dynamics of local economic development in Rome , 2019, European Planning Studies.

[32]  P. Muñoz,et al.  Rural entrepreneurship in place: an integrated framework , 2019, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development.

[33]  M. Gorton,et al.  Shining a spotlight on small rural businesses: How does their performance compare with urban? , 2019, Journal of Rural Studies.

[34]  Darja Reuschke.  The subjective well-being of homeworkers across life domains , 2019, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space.

[35]  W. Clark,et al.  Mapping the landscape of urban work: Home-based businesses and the built environment , 2019 .

[36]  Anne-Mette Hjalager,et al.  The translocal fluidity of rural grassroots festivals in the network society , 2019, Social & Cultural Geography.

[37]  G. Hearn,et al.  Working from the Other Office: Trialling Co‐Working Spaces for Public Servants , 2018 .

[38]  G. Bosworth,et al.  Economic linkages between urban and rural regions – what’s in it for the rural? , 2018 .

[39]  G. Bosworth,et al.  Interrogating the meaning of a rural business through a rural capitals framework , 2018 .

[40]  M. Wright,et al.  Sector-Based Entrepreneurial Capabilities and the Promise of Sector Studies in Entrepreneurship , 2018 .

[41]  S. Nambisan.  Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship , 2017 .

[42]  Erzsébet Szeréna Zoltán,et al.  Rural Enterprise Hub Supporting Rural Entrepreneurship and Innovation – Case Studies from Hungary , 2017 .

[43]  G. Bosworth,et al.  Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas , 2017 .

[44]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  Broadband and the creative industries in rural Scotland. , 2017 .

[45]  Bm Bert Sadowski,et al.  Advanced users and the adoption of high speed broadband: results of a living lab study in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[46]  Emilija Stojmenova Duh,et al.  Fablabs as Drivers for Open Innovation and Co-creation to Foster Rural Development , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the Internet of Things (IIKI).

[47]  Bettina Bock,et al.  Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection , 2016 .

[48]  R. Huggins,et al.  Drivers of University–Industry Links: The Case of Knowledge-Intensive Business Service Firms in Rural Locations , 2016 .

[49]  A. Stockdale.  Contemporary and ‘Messy’ Rural In‐migration Processes: Comparing Counterurban and Lateral Rural Migration , 2016 .

[50]  Alexander J. A. M. van Deursen,et al.  Do the rich get digitally richer? Quantity and quality of support for digital engagement , 2016 .

[51]  Steven W. Baker,et al.  The supportive network: rural disadvantaged older people and ICT , 2016, Ageing and Society.

[52]  Jari Kolehmainen,et al.  Quadruple Helix, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Development: Lessons from Remote, Rural and Less-Favoured Regions , 2016 .

[53]  Elizabeth A. Mack,et al.  Broadband Telecommunications and Regional Development , 2015 .

[54]  A. Norberg,et al.  Quadruple Helix, Innovation and the Knowledge-Based Development: Lessons from Remote, Rural and Less-Favoured Regions , 2015, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[55]  Per Davidsson,et al.  Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus : a re-conceptualization , 2015 .

[56]  D. Doloreux,et al.  Central places or networks? Paradigms, metaphors, and spatial configurations of innovation-related service use , 2015 .

[57]  S. Korsgaard,et al.  Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural – between place and space , 2015 .

[58]  Anita Fuzi,et al.  Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales , 2015 .

[59]  Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko,et al.  Castells’ network concept and its connections to social, economic and political network analyses , 2015, J. Soc. Struct..

[60]  Sofia Wixe,et al.  What is Smart Rural Development , 2015 .

[61]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Re-thinking commercial counterurbanisation: Evidence from rural Nova Scotia, Canada , 2014 .

[62]  Marko Ampuja,et al.  From ‘Post-Industrial’ to ‘Network Society’ and Beyond: The Political Conjunctures and Current Crisis of Information Society Theory , 2014 .

[63]  J. Atterton,et al.  The contribution of rural businesses to community resilience , 2014 .

[64]  C. Mason,et al.  ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEMS AND GROWTH ORIENTED ENTREPRENEURSHIP , 2014 .

[65]  Kazys Varnelis.  Networked Publics , 2012 .

[66]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Working Alone Together , 2012 .

[67]  L. Herslund,et al.  The Rural Creative Class: Counterurbanisation and Entrepreneurship in the Danish Countryside , 2012 .

[68]  C. Kalantaridis,et al.  Entrepreneurial Origin and the Configuration of Innovation in Rural Areas: The Case of Cumbria, North West England , 2011 .

[69]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  Network practices and entrepreneurial growth , 2010 .

[70]  S. Gruber,et al.  Agglomeration, Agriculture, and the Perspective of the Periphery , 2010 .

[71]  G. Fuchs,et al.  Human Rights in the Global Information Society , 2009 .

[72]  Shana M. Mason,et al.  Digital Disempowerment in a Network Society , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[73]  M. Coombes,et al.  Migration and Longer-Distance Commuting in Rural England , 2009 .

[74]  Timothy R. Wojan,et al.  Recasting the Creative Class to Examine Growth Processes in Rural and Urban Counties , 2007 .

[75]  Gerardo del Cerro Santamaría.  The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective , 2007 .

[76]  D. Skuras,et al.  Business networks and innovation in selected lagging areas of the European Union: A spatial perspective , 2006 .

[77]  C. Ray.  Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in the EU , 2006 .

[78]  J. Murdoch.  Networking Rurality: Emergent Complexity in the Countryside , 2006 .

[79]  M. Castells.  The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective , 2005 .

[80]  P. Benneworth,et al.  University spin-off policies and economic development in Less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice , 2005 .

[81]  Roberto Camagni,et al.  THE CONCEPT OF INNOVATIVE MILIEU AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR PUBLIC POLICIES IN EUROPEAN LAGGING REGIONS , 2005 .

[82]  K. Simonsen.  Networks, Flows, and Fluids—Reimagining Spatial Analysis? , 2004 .

[83]  Lilach Nachum,et al.  Why do business service firms cluster? Small consultancies, clustering and decentralization in London and southern England , 2002 .

[84]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Networks — a new paradigm of rural development? , 2000 .

[85]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  MODELING EMPLOYEES' PERCEPTIONS AND PROPORTIONAL PREFERENCES OF WORK LOCATIONS: THE REGULAR WORKPLACE AND TELECOMMUTING ALTERNATIVES. IN: TRANSPORT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[86]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[87]  R. Saleth.  Book reviewTechnology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional, and National Competitiveness.: Edward J. Malecki. Addison Wesley Longman Ltd., Essex, 1997; xvi+460 pages: tables, figures, bibliography, and index. , 1999 .

[88]  E. Malecki.  Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional, and National Change , 1991 .