Smart meter deployment in Europe: A comparative case study on the impacts of national policy schemes

Abstract While low-carbon energy technologies are often regarded as a key solution to climate change mitigation, the successful transformation to a clean energy economy requires a solid scientific understanding of the technological change process and the role of public policies. To better support effective policy making, we conducted a comparative case study to investigate how the choice of policy bundles has led to the cross-national variation in smart meter deployment in Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands. We found that countries with a combination of policy measures that address multiple barriers to smart meters tend to be leaders, while laggards often overlook or fail to adopt policies to overcome key barriers. This research builds on technology diffusion and policy impact assessment literature and provides valuable insights on the design of effective policy tools to promote clean energy innovations.

[1]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[2]  R. Quentin Grafton,et al.  Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) , 2012 .

[3]  Alexander L. Davis,et al.  Preparing for smart grid technologies: A behavioral decision research approach to understanding consumer expectations about smart meters , 2012 .

[4]  B. Kitchenham,et al.  Case Studies for Method and Tool Evaluation , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[5]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options , 2011 .

[6]  Al Anneloes Meijnders,et al.  Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage , 2007 .

[7]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[8]  Graeme Auld,et al.  Evaluating the effects of policy innovations: Lessons from a systematic review of policies promoting low-carbon technology , 2014 .

[9]  A. Cavoukian,et al.  SmartPrivacy for the Smart Grid: embedding privacy into the design of electricity conservation , 2010 .

[10]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Responsible Technology Acceptance: Model Development and Application to Consumer Acceptance of Smart Grid Technology , 2014 .

[11]  Bert-Jaap Koops,et al.  Smart Metering and Privacy in Europe: Lessons from the Dutch Case , 2013, European Data Protection.

[12]  H. B. Robles,et al.  Economic regulation of electricity grids in Nordic countries , 2011 .

[13]  H. Nilsson,et al.  Sweden — Reaching 100% ‘smart meters’ July 1, 2009 , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[14]  Daniel C. Matisoff,et al.  Advanced Metering Infrastructure Deployment in the United States: The Impact of Polycentric Governance and Contextual Changes , 2016 .

[15]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[16]  Emilio J. Palacios-Garcia,et al.  Smart metering system for microgrids , 2015, IECON 2015 - 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[17]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Accelerating the deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies by strengthening the innovation system , 2010 .

[18]  Andrei Z. Morch,et al.  Smart electricity metering as an energy effi ciency instrument: Comparative analyses of regulation and market conditions in Europe , 2006 .

[19]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[20]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating , 2012 .

[21]  J. Painuly Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis , 2001 .

[22]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004) , 2007 .

[23]  Lingfeng Wang,et al.  Smart meters for power grid — Challenges, issues, advantages and status , 2011, 2011 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[24]  M. McHenry Technical and governance considerations for advanced metering infrastructure/smart meters: Technology, security, uncertainty, costs, benefits, and risks , 2013 .

[25]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won't work) , 2010 .