Technical analysis and the profitability of U.S. foreign exchange intervention

This article reconciles an apparent contradiction found by recent research on U.S. intervention in foreign exchange markets. LeBaron (1996) and Szakmary and Mathur (1997) show that extrapolative technical trading rules trade against U.S. foreign exchange intervention and produce excess returns during intervention periods. Leahy (1995) shows that U.S. intervention itself is profitable over long periods of time. In other words, technical trades make excess returns when they take positions contrary to U.S. intervention - U.S. intervention itself is profitable, however. This article will first present recent research on these subjects. Then it will discuss how differing investment horizons and varying returns and position sizes may reconcile these facts.

[1]  H. Mayer,et al.  Official intervention in the exchange markets : stabilising or destabilising? , 1983 .

[2]  R. Sweeney Do central banks lose on foreign-exchange intervention? A review article , 1997 .

[3]  M. Leahy The profitability of U.S. intervention , 1989 .

[4]  F. Lutz,et al.  The case for flexible exchange rates , 1954 .

[5]  Christopher J. Neely Technical analysis in the foreign exchange market: a layman's guide , 1997 .

[6]  I. Mathur,et al.  Central bank intervention and trading rule profits in foreign exchange markets , 1997 .

[7]  D. Henderson,et al.  Definition and measurement of exchange market intervention , 1983 .

[8]  R. Sweeney,et al.  Beating the Foreign Exchange Market , 1986 .

[9]  Owen F. Humpage Institutional aspects of U.S. intervention , 1994 .

[10]  Milton Friedman,et al.  The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates , 1996 .

[11]  L. Summers,et al.  Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Serial dependence in, currency returns , 1989 .

[13]  C. Corrado,et al.  The cost of a central bank leaning against a random walk , 1986 .

[14]  B. LeBaron Technical Trading Rule Profitability and Foreign Exchange Intervention , 1996 .

[15]  M. Flanders The effectiveness of central bank intervention: A survey of the literature after 1982: Hali J. Edison, Special Paper No. 18; (Department of Economics, International Finance Section, Princeton University, Princeton University Press, 1993 a , 1995 .

[16]  Hali J. Edison The Effectiveness of Central-Bank Intervention: A Survey of the Literature After 1982 , 1993 .

[17]  M. Leahy The profitability of US intervention in the foreign exchange markets , 1995 .

[18]  M. Dooley,et al.  Analysis of short-run exchange behavior: March, 1993 to September, 1975 , 1976 .

[19]  S. Salant Profitable speculation, price stability, and welfare , 1974 .

[20]  Christopher J. Neely,et al.  Technical Analysis and Central Bank Intervention , 2000 .

[21]  Owen F. Humpage U.S. Intervention: Assessing the Probability of Success , 1996 .