Affinity for natal environments by dispersers impacts reproduction and explains geographical structure of a highly mobile bird

Understanding dispersal and habitat selection behaviours is central to many problems in ecology, evolution and conservation. One factor often hypothesized to influence habitat selection by dispersers is the natal environment experienced by juveniles. Nonetheless, evidence for the effect of natal environment on dispersing, wild vertebrates remains limited. Using 18 years of nesting and mark–resight data across an entire North American geographical range of an endangered bird, the snail kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis), we tested for natal effects on breeding-site selection by dispersers and its consequences for reproductive success and population structure. Dispersing snail kites were more likely to nest in wetlands of the same habitat type (lacustrine or palustrine) as their natal wetland, independent of dispersal distance, but this preference declined with age and if individuals were born during droughts. Importantly, dispersing kites that bred in natal-like habitats had lower nest success and productivity than kites that did not. These behaviours help explain recently described population connectivity and spatial structure across their geographical range and reveal that assortative breeding is occurring, where birds are more likely to breed with individuals born in the same wetland type as their natal habitat. Natal environments can thus have long-term and large-scale effects on populations in nature, even in highly mobile animals.

[1]  Walter H. Piper,et al.  Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  J. Stamps,et al.  The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  Christine W. Miller,et al.  The type and timing of social information alters offspring production , 2008, Biology Letters.

[4]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Reproductive responses of the endangered snail kite to variations in prey density , 2014 .

[5]  Michael F. Benard,et al.  Integrating across Life‐History Stages: Consequences of Natal Habitat Effects on Dispersal , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Wiley M. Kitchens,et al.  Network modularity reveals critical scales for connectivity in ecology and evolution , 2013, Nature Communications.

[7]  M. Boyce,et al.  WOLVES INFLUENCE ELK MOVEMENTS: BEHAVIOR SHAPES A TROPHIC CASCADE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 2005 .

[8]  Marc Bélisle,et al.  MEASURING LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: THE CHALLENGE OF BEHAVIORAL LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY , 2005 .

[9]  Divya Vasudev,et al.  From dispersal constraints to landscape connectivity: lessons from species distribution modeling , 2015 .

[10]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  GHOSTS OF HABITATS PAST: CONTRIBUTION OF LANDSCAPE CHANGE TO CURRENT HABITATS USED BY SHRUBLAND BIRDS , 2000 .

[12]  P. Sherman,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary traps. , 2002 .

[13]  H. F. Percival,et al.  Dry down impacts on apple snail (Pomacea paludosa) demography: Implications for wetland water management , 2008, Wetlands.

[14]  B. Doligez,et al.  When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Julien Martin,et al.  Effects of an exotic prey species on a native specialist: Example of the snail kite , 2010 .

[16]  Robert J. Fletcher,et al.  Social-Information use in Heterogeneous Landscapes: A Prospectus , 2010 .

[17]  Bruce A. Robertson,et al.  How the type of anthropogenic change alters the consequences of ecological traps , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  James E. Hines,et al.  Natal location influences movement and survival of a spatially structured population of snail kites , 2007, Oecologia.

[19]  A. Desrochers,et al.  Natal habitat-biased dispersal in the Siberian flying squirrel , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  J. Coyne Sympatric speciation , 2007, Current Biology.

[21]  Christine W. Miller,et al.  Natal social environment influences habitat selection later in life , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Julien Martin,et al.  Multiscale patterns of movement in fragmented landscapes and consequences on demography of the snail kite in Florida. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[23]  D. H. Vuren,et al.  Detectability, philopatry, and the distribution of dispersal distances in vertebrates. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  J. Stamps,et al.  Dispersing brush mice prefer habitat like home , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Christa L Zweig,et al.  Reconstructing historical habitat data with predictive models. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  P. Goos,et al.  Discrete choice modelling of natal dispersal: ‘Choosing’ where to breed from a finite set of available areas , 2015 .

[27]  D. Garant,et al.  Habitat-linked population genetic differentiation in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus. , 2012, The Journal of heredity.

[28]  W. Kendall,et al.  Extreme weather and experience influence reproduction in an endangered bird. , 2012, Ecology.

[29]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Networks of spatial genetic variation across species , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  P H Harvey,et al.  THE NATAL AND BREEDING DISPERSAL OF BIRDS , 1982 .

[31]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Does hunting activity for game species have indirect effects on resource selection by the endangered Florida panther? , 2015 .

[32]  Jeremy M. Davis Preference or desperation? Distinguishing between the natal habitat's effects on habitat choice , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  M. Acevedo,et al.  Social network models predict movement and connectivity in ecological landscapes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  S. Levine,et al.  A model for behavioral regulation of metapopulation dynamics , 2005 .

[35]  J. Stamps,et al.  Adaptive effects of natal experience on habitat selection by dispersers , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Jeremy M. Davis Patterns of Variation in the Influence of Natal Experience on Habitat Choice , 2008, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[37]  Can settlement in natal-like habitat explain maladaptive habitat selection? , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Cyclic Drought, Dispersal, and the Conservation of the Snail Kite in Florida: Lessons in Critical Habitat , 1989 .

[39]  T. Shaffer A UNIFIED APPROACH TO ANALYZING NEST SUCCESS , 2004 .

[40]  L. M. Cowardin,et al.  Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States , 2017 .

[41]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  How Different Types of Natal Experience Affect Habitat Preference , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[42]  Eric A. Treml,et al.  Evaluating the metapopulation consequences of ecological traps , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  A. Chalfoun,et al.  Facultative nest patch shifts in response to nest predation risk in the Brewer’s sparrow: a “win-stay, lose-switch” strategy? , 2010, Oecologia.

[44]  Ronald R. Swaisgood,et al.  Someplace like home: Experience, habitat selection and conservation biology , 2007 .

[45]  William E. Stutz,et al.  Phenotype-Dependent Native Habitat Preference Facilitates Divergence between Parapatric Lake and Stream Stickleback , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  J. Kelly,et al.  Habitat selection and the perceptual trap. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.