Dynamic causal modelling for fMRI: A two-state model

Dynamical causal modelling (DCM) for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a technique to infer directed connectivity among brain regions. These models distinguish between a neuronal level, which models neuronal interactions among regions, and an observation level, which models the hemodynamic responses each region. The original DCM formulation considered only one neuronal state per region. In this work, we adopt a more plausible and less constrained neuronal model, using two neuronal states (populations) per region. Critically, this gives us an explicit model of intrinsic (between-population) connectivity within a region. In addition, by using positivity constraints, the model conforms to the organization of real cortical hierarchies, whose extrinsic connections are excitatory (glutamatergic). By incorporating two populations within each region we can model selective changes in both extrinsic and intrinsic connectivity. Using synthetic data, we show that the two-state model is internal consistent and identifiable. We then apply the model to real data, explicitly modelling intrinsic connections. Using model comparison, we found that the two-state model is better than the single-state model. Furthermore, using the two-state model we find that it is possible to disambiguate between subtle changes in coupling; we were able to show that attentional gain, in the context of visual motion processing, is accounted for sufficiently by an increased sensitivity of excitatory populations of neurons in V5, to forward afferents from earlier visual areas.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Approaches to the cortical analysis of auditory objects , 2007, Hearing Research.

[3]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto,et al.  Realistically Coupled Neural Mass Models Can Generate EEG Rhythms , 2007, Neural Computation.

[5]  J. Cowan,et al.  A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue , 1973, Kybernetik.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Dynamical Systems: An Application to fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling of evoked responses in EEG/MEG with lead field parameterization , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal models of neural system dynamics: current state and future extensions , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[11]  Karl J. Friston.  Another Neural Code? , 1997, NeuroImage.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multivariate Autoregressive Modelling of fMRI time series , 2003 .

[13]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing , 1987 .

[15]  Juan C. Jiménez,et al.  Nonlinear EEG analysis based on a neural mass model , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[17]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[18]  R. Buxton,et al.  Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: The balloon model , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling: A generative model of slice timing in fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigating the Functional Role of Callosal Connections with Dynamic Causal Models , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.