Evaluation of nevirapine and/or hydroxyurea with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected subjects

Objective: To examine the effect of adding nevirapine (NVP) and/or hydroxyurea (HU) to a triple nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) regimen in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Methods: HIV-1-infected, treatment-naive adults were randomized, using a factorial design, to add NVP and/or HU to the triple NRTI backbone of zidovudine plus lamivudine plus abacavir. Primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as having plasma HIV RNA levels > 50 copies/ml after week 24, or discontinuation of randomized treatment. Follow-up was 72 weeks Results: For the 229 subjects, median plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.61 log10 copies/ml and median CD4 cell count was 269 × 106 cells/l. NVP users reached plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml more rapidly than subjects using no NVP (log-rank test; P = 0.011). In the as-treated analysis, 21.6% of subjects using NVP versus 48.8% using no NVP reached the primary endpoint (P = 0.013). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 83.3% of subjects using HU versus 73.0% using no HU experienced treatment failure (P = 0.060), while no difference was observed in the as-treated analysis (34.5 versus 36.7%). Differences in the intent-to-treat analysis were accounted for by toxicity: 52.6% of subjects using HU experienced toxicity leading to discontinuation of randomized treatment versus 28.7% of subjects using no HU. Conclusion: The use of NVP in addition to a triple NRTI regimen improved both short- and long-term antiretroviral efficacy. The use of HU significantly contributed to treatment failure because of toxicity.

[1]  Michael S Saag,et al.  Antiretroviral treatment for adult HIV infection in 2002: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. , 2002, JAMA.

[2]  F. Wit,et al.  Improved long-term suppression of HIV-1 replication with a triple-class multidrug regimen compared with standard of care antiretroviral therapy , 2002, AIDS.

[3]  A. Lazzarin,et al.  Prednisolone does not prevent hypersensitivity reactions in antiretroviral drug regimens containing abacavir with or without nevirapine , 2001, AIDS.

[4]  Joseph Quinn,et al.  Overview of the effectiveness of triple combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 infected adults , 2001, AIDS.

[5]  D. Richman,et al.  Residual human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Type 1 RNA and DNA in lymph nodes and HIV RNA in genital secretions and in cerebrospinal fluid after suppression of viremia for 2 years. , 2001, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  S. Hammer,et al.  Abacavir-lamivudine-zidovudine vs indinavir-lamivudine-zidovudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults: A randomized equivalence trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[7]  M. Lederman,et al.  Placebo-controlled trial of prednisone in advanced HIV-1 infection , 2001, AIDS.

[8]  A. Telenti,et al.  Long-term hydroxyurea in combination with didanosine and stavudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection , 2000, AIDS.

[9]  E. Rosenberg,et al.  Antiretroviral resistance during successful therapy of HIV type 1 infection. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Mellors,et al.  3-Year Suppression of HIV Viremia with Indinavir, Zidovudine, and Lamivudine , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  T V Perneger,et al.  Time of initiation of antiretroviral therapy: impact on HIV-1 viraemia , 2000, AIDS.

[12]  J Witek,et al.  Residual HIV-1 RNA in blood plasma of patients taking suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy. , 1999, JAMA.

[13]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Evolution of Envelope Sequences of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Cellular Reservoirs in the Setting of Potent Antiviral Therapy , 1999, Journal of Virology.

[14]  C. A. Macken,et al.  Persistence of HIV-1 transcription in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells in patients receiving potent antiretroviral therapy. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Kissinger,et al.  Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  H. Schuitemaker,et al.  Alternative multidrug regimen provides improved suppression of HIV‐1 replication over triple therapy , 1998, AIDS.

[17]  J. Lisziewicz,et al.  Therapeutic advantage of hydroxyurea and didanosine combination therapy in patients previously treated with zidovudine. , 1998, AIDS.

[18]  P. Vernazza,et al.  A placebo‐controlled trial of didanosine plus stavudine, with and without hydroxyurea, for HIV infection , 1998 .

[19]  G. Satten,et al.  Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  J. Lisziewicz,et al.  Combination of a drug targeting the cell with a drug targeting the virus controls human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance. , 1997, AIDS research and human retroviruses.

[21]  J. Montaner,et al.  A pilot study of hydroxyurea among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease receiving chronic didanosine therapy: Canadian HIV trials network protocol 080. , 1997, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[22]  S. Cox,et al.  Increased activation of the combination of 3'-azido-3'-deoxythymidine and 2'-deoxy-3'-thiacytidine in the presence of hydroxyurea , 1997, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[23]  H. Mitsuya,et al.  Disparate actions of hydroxyurea in potentiation of purine and pyrimidine 2',3'-dideoxynucleoside activities against replication of human immunodeficiency virus. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Grange,et al.  Synergistic anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 effect of hydroxamate compounds with 2',3'-dideoxyinosine in infected resting human lymphocytes. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Donehower An overview of the clinical experience with hydroxyurea. , 1992, Seminars in oncology.

[26]  J. Lisziewicz,et al.  Hydroxyurea and didanosine is a more potent combination than hydroxyurea and zidovudine. , 1997, Antiviral therapy.