Automatic Network Slicing for Multi-Mode Internet of Underwater Things (MM-IoUT)

In recent years, many underwater communication applications have been proposed and tested, leading to the Internet of underwater things (IoUT) concept. In the IoUT, sensors may be deployed individually on sea surface and seabed as well as in water at different depths. They also may be integrated into underwater items such as fish, plants, autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), remotely operated underwater vehicles (ROVs), and divers. Depending on the application, different connectivity requirements must be satisfied such as data rate, latency, and reliability. However, the underwater communication channels pose a significant challenge to meet these requirements. To accommodate various applications with different service level agreements (SLAs), a multimode (acoustic, optical, and magnetic induction (MI)) communication system is proposed to take advantage of the modes' complementary features. Furthermore, an automatic network slicing (ANS) solution is proposed to provide globally optimized resource management, enhanced quality of service (QoS), simplified network operation, reduced deployment cost, and functional isolation of services. Taking the channel characteristics of the acoustic, optical, and MI communication modes into consideration, an optimization problem is formulated and solved for multimode IoUT (MM-IoUT) to enable admission control, routing, and dynamic resource allocation based on the different SLAs. Numerical analysis is conducted to verify the proposed solution and evaluate its performance.

[1]  I. Akyildiz,et al.  Towards Automatic Network Slicing for the Internet of Space Things , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[2]  Osama M. Bushnaq,et al.  A Universal Multimode (Acoustic, Magnetic Induction, Optical, RF) Software Defined Radio Architecture for Underwater Communication , 2021, WUWNet.

[3]  Osama M. Bushnaq,et al.  Automatic Network Slicing for Resource Allocation in Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems , 2021, 2021 International Balkan Conference on Communications and Networking (BalkanCom).

[4]  Yahong Rosa Zheng,et al.  Signal Detection for Underwater IoT Devices With Long and Sparse Channels , 2020, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[5]  Nasir Saeed,et al.  Opportunistic Routing for Opto-Acoustic Internet of Underwater Things , 2020, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[6]  Nasir Saeed,et al.  A Software-Defined Opto-Acoustic Network Architecture for Internet of Underwater Things , 2019, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Yuzhou Li,et al.  A Survey of Underwater Magnetic Induction Communications: Fundamental Issues, Recent Advances, and Challenges , 2019, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Huseyin Ugur Yildiz,et al.  Packet Size Optimization for Lifetime Maximization in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[9]  Shih-Chun Lin,et al.  End-to-End Network Slicing for 5G&B Wireless Software-Defined Systems , 2018, 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[10]  V. A. Grigor’ev,et al.  An Arctic-Type Shallow-Water Acoustic Waveguide as an Information Transmission Channel for Underwater Communications , 2018, Acoustical Physics.

[11]  Cheng-Xiang Wang,et al.  Optical Wireless Communication Channel Measurements and Models , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Nasir Saeed,et al.  Underwater Optical Wireless Communications, Networking, and Localization: A Survey , 2018, Ad Hoc Networks.

[13]  Songzuo Liu,et al.  MIMO-OFDM underwater acoustic communication systems - A review , 2017, Phys. Commun..

[14]  Yuhan Dong,et al.  A Survey of Underwater Optical Wireless Communications , 2017, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[15]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  SoftWater: Software-defined networking for next-generation underwater communication systems , 2016, Ad Hoc Networks.

[16]  Georges Kaddoum,et al.  Underwater Optical Wireless Communication , 2016, IEEE Access.

[17]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Realizing underwater communication through magnetic induction , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  P. Willett,et al.  MIMO-OFDM for High-Rate Underwater Acoustic Communications , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[19]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[20]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater Acoustic Communication Channels: Propagation Models and Statistical Characterization , 2022 .