Optimal location of new forests in a suburban region

This paper looks at the optimal location of new forests in a suburban region under area constraints. The methodology takes into account use benefits, non-use benefits (both bequest and existence values), opportunity costs of converting agricultural land, as well as planting and management costs of the new forest. The recreational benefits of new forest sites are estimated using function transfer techniques. We show that the net social benefit of the total afforestation project varies up to a factor 6. The recreational value of a site varies considerably with the available substitutes.

[1]  Julii Brainard,et al.  Integrating geographical information systems into travel cost analysis and benefit transfer , 1999, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[2]  L. Drake.  The Non-market Value of the Swedish Agricultural Landscape , 1992 .

[3]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Developing a Methodology for Benefit Transfers Using Geographical Information Systems: Modelling Demand for Woodland Recreation , 1999 .

[4]  J. F. Benson,et al.  Implications of Recreation Demand for Forest Expansion in Great Britain , 1993 .

[5]  John B. Loomis,et al.  The Evolution of a More Rigorous Approach to Benefit Transfer: Benefit Function Transfer , 1992 .

[6]  N. Powe,et al.  Transferring Multivariate Benefit Functions Using Geographical Information Systems , 1998 .

[7]  D. Pearce.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: The environment: Assessing the social rate of return from investment in temperate zone forestry , 1994 .

[8]  J. Loomis,et al.  Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Use Values Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Use Values , 2000 .

[9]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Improving Benefit Transfer Demand Functions: A GIS Approach , 1997 .

[10]  Stef Proost,et al.  An integrated decision support framework for the prediction and evaluation of efficiency, environmental impact and total social cost of domestic and international forestry projects for greenhouse gas mitigation: description and case studies. , 2005 .

[11]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  The Costs of Carbon Sequestration: A Revealed-Preference Approach , 1999 .

[12]  Mette Termansen,et al.  Benefit Transfer over Time of Ecosystem Values: the Case of Forest Recreation , 2005 .

[13]  George R. Parsons,et al.  Benefits transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies , 1992 .

[14]  Richard G. Walsh,et al.  Recreation Economic Decisions Comparing Benefits and Costs , 1986 .

[15]  Yhf Cheung,et al.  VALUE OF DUTCH TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS IN 1997 , 1999 .

[16]  R. Scarpa,et al.  Valuing the Recreational Benefits from the Creation of Nature Reserves in Irish Forests , 2000 .

[17]  L. Mattsson,et al.  A note on benefits and costs of adjusting forestry to meet recreational demands , 2006 .

[18]  G. Wong,et al.  Applied Environmental Economics: A GIS Approach to Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2006 .

[19]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .