Designing impact evaluations: different perspectives

Debates on approaches to impact evaluation design appear to have reached an impasse in recent years. An objective of the international conference, Perspectives on Impact Evaluation, March 29th to April 2nd, Cairo, organized by 3ie, NONIE, AfrEA and UNICEF, was to bring together different voices and so work toward a consensus. A key session in this approach was a plenary in which experts from different perspectives were asked how they would approach the evaluation of three interventions: a conditional cash transfer, an infrastructure project and an anti-corruption program. The motivation for the session was that debates get stuck when they remain at the conceptual level, but that a greater degree of consensus can be achieved once we move to the specifics of the design of a particular evaluation.

[1]  Howard White,et al.  Theory-based impact evaluation: principles and practice , 2009 .

[2]  E. Mathenge,et al.  Evaluating the impact of microfranchising the distribution of anti-malarial drugs in Kenya on malaria mortality and morbidity , 2009 .

[3]  K. Soo.  Handbook of development economics. Volume 4 , 2009 .

[4]  Dominique van de Walle,et al.  Impact evaluation of rural road projects , 2009 .

[5]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Getting to Maybe: How the World Is Changed , 2008 .

[6]  Patricia J. Rogers,et al.  Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions , 2008 .

[7]  Dean S. Karlan,et al.  Expanding Credit Access: Using Randomized Supply Decisions to Estimate the Impacts , 2007 .

[8]  M. Patton,et al.  Getting to Maybe: How the World Is Changed , 2006 .

[9]  Emmanuel Skoufias,et al.  PROGRESA and Its Impacts on the Welfare of Rural Households in Mexico , 2005 .

[10]  P. McCann.  Transport costs and new economic geography , 2005 .

[11]  Susan J. Nichols,et al.  Multiple Lines and Levels of Evidence for Detecting Ecological Responses to Management Intervention , 2005 .

[12]  D. Faith,et al.  Monitoring Ecological Impacts: Concepts and Practice in Flowing Waters , 2002 .

[13]  Cynthia F. Kurtz,et al.  The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[14]  S. Sherlock.  Combating Corruption in Indonesia? The Ombudsman and the Assets Auditing Commission , 2002 .

[15]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Monitoring Ecological Impacts: Inferential uncertainty and multiple lines of evidence , 2002 .

[16]  E. Duflo,et al.  Women's Leadership and Policy Decisions: Evidence from a Nationwide Randomized Experiment in India , 2001 .

[17]  Hanan G. Jacoby,et al.  Access to Markets and the Benefits of Rural Roads , 1998 .

[18]  Carol H. Weiss.  Evaluation : methods for studying programs and policies , 1997 .

[19]  Michael Quinn Patton,et al.  Utilization-Focused Evaluation , 1979 .

[20]  A. B. Hill.  The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[21]  Irene Guijt,et al.  Seeking surprise : rethinking monitoring for collective learning in rural resource management , 2008 .

[22]  Thijs Knaap,et al.  Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure investments , 2003 .

[23]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Managing the Unknowable : The Strategic Boundaries Between Order and Chaos , 1992 .