Enhancement of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET Image Quality by Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Using Advanced Intelligent Clear-IQ Engine in Semiconductor-Based PET/CT Scanners

Deep learning (DL) image quality improvement has been studied for application to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). It is unclear, however, whether DL can increase the quality of images obtained with semiconductor-based PET/CT scanners. This study aimed to compare the quality of semiconductor-based PET/CT scanner images obtained by DL-based technology and conventional OSEM image with Gaussian postfilter. For DL-based data processing implementation, we used Advanced Intelligent Clear-IQ Engine (AiCE, Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan) and for OSEM images, Gaussian postfilter of 3 mm FWHM is used. Thirty patients who underwent semiconductor-based PET/CT scanner imaging between May 6, 2021, and May 19, 2021, were enrolled. We compared AiCE images and OSEM images and scored them for delineation, image noise, and overall image quality. We also measured standardized uptake values (SUVs) in tumors and healthy tissues and compared them between AiCE and OSEM. AiCE images scored significantly higher than OSEM images for delineation, image noise, and overall image quality. The Fleiss kappa value for the interobserver agreement was 0.57. Among the 21 SUV measurements in healthy organs, 11 (52.4%) measurements were significantly different between AiCE and OSEM images. More pathological lesions were detected in AiCE images as compared with OSEM images, with AiCE images showing higher SUVs for pathological lesions than OSEM images. AiCE can improve the quality of images acquired with semiconductor-based PET/CT scanners, including the noise level, contrast, and tumor detection capability.

[1]  Shu Liao,et al.  Deep learning-assisted PET imaging achieves fast scan/low-dose examination , 2022, EJNMMI Physics.

[2]  T. Y. Erdil,et al.  Assessment of Takayasu arteritis in routine practice with PETVAS, an 18F-FDG PET quantitative scoring tool. , 2021, Turkish journal of medical sciences.

[3]  U. Tateishi,et al.  Deep learning-based image quality improvement of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a retrospective observational study , 2021, EJNMMI Physics.

[4]  R. Abgral,et al.  Assessment of Image Quality and Lesion Detectability With Digital PET/CT System , 2021, Frontiers in Medicine.

[5]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Deep learning–based metal artefact reduction in PET/CT imaging , 2021, European Radiology.

[6]  Lohith G. Kini,et al.  Quantitative [18]FDG PET asymmetry features predict long-term seizure recurrence in refractory epilepsy , 2021, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[7]  P. D. di Summa,et al.  The value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT in the management of infective native aortic aneurysms , 2021, Vascular.

[8]  P. Amarenco,et al.  Evaluation of non-stenotic carotid atherosclerotic plaques with combined FDG-PET imaging and CT angiography in patients with ischemic stroke of unknown origin , 2021, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[9]  Jianhua Yan,et al.  Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data , 2020, EJNMMI Research.

[10]  Xuejun Ma,et al.  Baseline SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET-CT indicates prognosis of extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma , 2020, Medicine.

[11]  Y. Hadi,et al.  Utility of FDG PET/CT for assessment of lung nodules identified during low dose computed tomography screening , 2020, BMC Medical Imaging.

[12]  M. Kallergi,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT in Pulmonary Sarcoidosis:Quantifying Inflammation by the TLG index , 2020, Expert review of respiratory medicine.

[13]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Image Quality and Semiquantitative Measurements on the Biograph Vision PET/CT System: Initial Experiences and Comparison with the Biograph mCT , 2020, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  E. Trägårdh,et al.  Comparison between silicon photomultiplier-based and conventional PET/CT in patients with suspected lung cancer—a pilot study , 2019, EJNMMI research.

[15]  S. Fanti,et al.  How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images? , 2019, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[16]  Jian Zhou,et al.  Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT , 2019, European Radiology.

[17]  K. Nikus,et al.  FDG-PET in possible cardiac sarcoidosis: Right ventricular uptake and high total cardiac metabolic activity predict cardiovascular events , 2019, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  Albert Flotats,et al.  Comparison of image quality and lesion detection between digital and analog PET/CT , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  V. Camacho,et al.  Digital vs. analog PET/CT: intra-subject comparison of the SUVmax in target lesions and reference regions , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  Heyu Wu,et al.  Performance evaluation of a new high-sensitivity time-of-flight clinical PET/CT system , 2018, EJNMMI Physics.

[21]  Tao Tan,et al.  Denoising of 3D magnetic resonance images with multi-channel residual learning of convolutional neural network , 2017, Japanese Journal of Radiology.

[22]  A. Allen,et al.  The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT on Staging and Prognosis in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2016, European Radiology.

[23]  Hirokazu Ikeda,et al.  Recent progress of MPPC-based scintillation detectors in high precision X-ray and gamma-ray imaging , 2015 .

[24]  G. Loudos,et al.  Evaluation of a SiPM array coupled to a Gd3Al2Ga3O12:Ce (GAGG:Ce) discrete scintillator. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[25]  M. Senda,et al.  Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 2.0 , 2014, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Craig S. Levin,et al.  Recent Developments in PET Instrumentation , 2010 .

[27]  C. Levin,et al.  Recent development in PET instrumentation. , 2010, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.

[28]  G Antoch,et al.  PET/CT for the staging and follow-up of patients with malignancies. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[29]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  A. Kuten,et al.  Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.