A framework for technology assessment from different scientific viewpoints: Preliminary report

Technology assimilation is a complex process that requires effort from both engineering and business professionals. However, in practice, technology assimilation is generally supported with a single factor technology assessment tool, such as the technology readiness levels (TRLs) categorization. This paper argues that this approach is not sufficient in a complex business environment. The TRL levels do not provide the various stakeholders with a holistic viewpoint and are not designed to allow consideration of different types of technology in a way that can be broadly understood and accepted by all. This paper approaches the problem of technology integration by classifying technology from three different viewpoints. Specifically, this paper proposes a conceptual technology assessment framework (TAF) which employs the concepts of systems engineering, to integrate the three different technology viewpoints into a System of Systems (SoS) level framework. This prototype model is demonstrated by a previously published case study examining vehicle emissions.

[1]  M. Meyer,et al.  Innovation and Enterprise Growth , 2005 .

[2]  Robert Rosen,et al.  The NASA technology push towards future space mission systems , 1989 .

[3]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology development and integration: an empirical study of the interaction between applied science and product development , 1995 .

[4]  K. Leonard,et al.  Moving from the lab to the field: Exploring scrutiny and duration effects in lab experiments , 2008 .

[5]  Charles E. Dickerson,et al.  A ROSETTA framework for live / synthetic aviation tradeoffs: Preliminary Report , 2013, 2013 8th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering.

[6]  Mario Bunge,et al.  Technology as Applied Science , 1966 .

[7]  John C. Mankins,et al.  Technology readiness assessments: A retrospective , 2009 .

[8]  Brian J. Sauser,et al.  Integration maturity metrics: Development of an integration readiness level , 2010, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[9]  Katherine J. Klein,et al.  Innovation Implementation , 2005 .

[10]  J. Bessant,et al.  Targeting innovation and implications for capability development , 2004 .

[11]  Stephen K. Markham,et al.  Bridging the Valley of Death: Lessons Learned From 14 Years of Commercialization of Technology Education , 2009 .

[12]  D. Nobelius,et al.  Towards the sixth generation of R&D management , 2004 .

[13]  M. Davy,et al.  The effects of split injections on high exhaust gas recirculation low-temperature diesel engine combustion , 2013 .

[14]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[15]  Stephen Ward,et al.  The Valley of Death as Context for Role Theory in Product Innovation , 2010 .

[16]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  The Importance of R&D for Innovation: A Reassessment Using French Survey Data , 2004 .

[17]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[18]  John C. Mankins,et al.  Technology Readiness Levels-A White Paper , 1995 .