Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended

[1]  M. Noorman.  Limits to the Autonomy of Agents , 2008 .

[2]  A. Briggle,et al.  Current issues in computing and philosophy , 2008 .

[3]  Arie Rip,et al.  Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology , 2007 .

[4]  A. Bruni,et al.  Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor Network Theory , 2007 .

[5]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Materializing Morality , 2006 .

[6]  H. Hachiya.  Engineering ethics , 2006, Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.

[7]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[8]  P. Verbeek.  What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[9]  J. Jelsma,et al.  Trapped in the Duality of Structure: An STS Approach to Engineering Ethics , 2005 .

[10]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the Morality of Artificial Agents , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[11]  R. Spier.  ETHICAL ISSUES ENGENDERED BY ENGINEERING WITH ATOMIC NUCLEI : Foundations , 2003 .

[12]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  Co-responsibility for research integrity , 2003, Science and engineering ethics.

[13]  Raymond E.Spier,et al.  Science and Technology Ethics , 2001 .

[14]  M. Pritchard,et al.  Responsible engineering: The importance of character and imagination , 2001, Science and engineering ethics.

[15]  Nicholas G. Meriwether,et al.  Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues , 2001 .

[16]  Paul van Dijk,et al.  Anthropology in the Age of Technology: The Philosophical Contribution of Günther Anders , 2000 .

[17]  Oswaldo Giacoia Junior.  Hans Jonas: technology as a subject for ethics , 1999 .

[18]  Henry S. Richardson,et al.  Institutionally Divided Moral Responsibility , 1999, Social Philosophy and Policy.

[19]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence , 1999 .

[20]  T. Swierstra.  Moeten artefacten moreel gerehabiliteerd , 1999 .

[21]  Giuseppe Gulizia,et al.  Il paradosso dell'utopia : recensione a Hans Jonas, Il principio responsabilità. Un'etica per la civiltà tecnologica, Einaudi, Torino 1998 (1990). Ed. orig.: Das Prinzip Verantwortung Insel Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1979 , 1999 .

[22]  Responsibility: Institutionally Divided Moral Responsibility , 1999 .

[23]  S. Bird.  Educational forum: Stimulating a sense of responsibility , 1998 .

[24]  A. Salzberg.  Commentary on “the social responsibilities of biological scientists” (S. J. Reiser and R. E. Bulger) , 1997, Science and engineering ethics.

[25]  S. Reiser,et al.  The social responsibilities of biological scientists , 1997, Science and engineering ethics.

[26]  Kurt Bayertz,et al.  Verantwortung : Prinzip oder Problem? , 1995 .

[27]  José Antonio Méndez Sanz,et al.  Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy , 1995 .

[28]  C. Bullard.  Shaping technology/Building society , 1994 .

[29]  L. Winner.  Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology , 1993 .

[30]  Langdon Winner,et al.  Social constructivism: Opening the black box and finding it empty∗ , 1993 .

[31]  A.J.M.L. Leyten,et al.  Technology assessment: waakhond of speurhond? , 1991 .

[32]  Terry L. Cooper.  Hierarchy, Virtue, and the Practice of Public Administration: A Perspective for Normative Ethics , 1987 .

[33]  Hans Lenk,et al.  Technik und Ethik , 1987 .

[34]  W. Feinberg,et al.  On After Virtue , 1984 .

[35]  H. Jonas,et al.  The Imperative of Responsibility , 1984 .

[36]  D. Collingridge.  The social control of technology , 1980 .

[37]  H. Jonas.  Das Prinzip Verantwortung , 1979 .

[38]  G. Anders,et al.  Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen , 1957 .