A multi-scale sensing and diagnosis system combining accelerometers and gyroscopes for bridge health monitoring

This paper presents a multi-scale sensing and diagnosis system combining accelerometers and gyroscopes for bridge health monitoring. Since the damage metric estimated from acceleration measurement is insensitive to damage near the hinged support of a bridge, the damage diagnosis performance is limited near the support region. However, the performance can be improved by using two or more complementary data measured from multi-scale sensing. To more effectively diagnose the integrity of an overall bridge structure, angular velocity is complementary to acceleration, because of its high sensitivity to damage near the hinged support. This study proposes a multi-scale sensing and diagnosis system for bridge health monitoring based on a two-step approach. First, the damage diagnosis based on acceleration measurement is performed on the whole structure by using deflection estimated by modal flexibility. Next, the angular-velocity-based damage diagnosis is additionally carried out to localize missed damage by the acceleration-based approach near the hinged support. For validating the feasibility of the proposed system, a series of numerical and experimental studies on a simply supported beam model was performed. It was found that the multiple damages (one is near the center and another is near the support) can be successfully localized by the proposed multi-scale sensing and diagnosis system, while the damage near the support was missed by a conventional damage metric estimated from acceleration measurements.

[1]  Zhishen Wu,et al.  Assessment of Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods Using Displacement and Distributed Strain Measurements , 2009 .

[2]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Damage-induced deflection approach for damage localization and quantification of shear buildings: validation on a full-scale shear building , 2012 .

[3]  Chung Bang Yun,et al.  Damage detection in beam-like structures using deflections obtained by modal flexibility matrices , 2008 .

[4]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[5]  Shen-En Chen,et al.  Reliability analysis of bridge evaluations based on 3D Light Detection and Ranging data , 2013 .

[6]  Dionisio Bernal,et al.  Modal Scaling from Known Mass Perturbations , 2004 .

[7]  Zhishen Wu,et al.  Two-level Damage Detection Strategy Based on Modal Parameters from Distributed Dynamic Macro-strain Measurements , 2007 .

[8]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[9]  Ki-Young Koo,et al.  Damage detection of shear buildings using deflections obtained by modal flexibility , 2010 .

[10]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Bridge-condition assessment by modal flexibility , 1994 .

[11]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A review of structural health monitoring literature 1996-2001 , 2002 .

[12]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Application of Modal Flexibility and Its Derivatives in Structural Identification , 1998 .

[13]  Rune Brincker,et al.  A Way of Getting Scaled Mode Shapes in Output Only Modal Testing , 2003 .

[14]  E. Parloo,et al.  Sensitivity-based operational mode shape normalisation: Application to a bridge , 2005 .

[15]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[16]  Robert Y. Liang,et al.  Detection of cracks in beam structures using measurements of natural frequencies , 1991 .

[17]  Jinping Ou,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies on damage localization of simply supported beams based on curvature difference probability method of waveform fractal dimension , 2012 .

[18]  E. Parloo,et al.  SENSITIVITY-BASED OPERATIONAL MODE SHAPE NORMALISATION , 2002 .

[19]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Robust regression and outlier detection , 1987 .