Using generalized additive models for construction of nonlinear classifiers in computer-aided diagnosis systems

Several investigators have pointed out the possibility of using computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) schemes, as second readers, to help radiologists in the interpretation of images. One of the most important aspects to be considered when the diagnostic imaging systems are analyzed is the evaluation of their diagnostic performance. To perform this task, receiver operating characteristic curves are the method of choice. An important step in nearly all CAD systems is the reduction of false positives, as well as the classification of lesions, using different algorithms, such as neural networks or feature analysis, and several statistical methods. A statistical model more often employed is linear discriminant analysis (LDA). However, LDA implies several limitations in the type of variables that it can analyze. In this work, we have developed a novel approach, based on generalized additive models (GAMs), as an alternative to LDA, which can deal with a broad variety of variables, improving the results produced by using the LDA model. As an application, we have used GAM techniques for reducing the number of false detections in a computerized method to detect clustered microcalcifications, and we have compared this with the results obtained when LDA was applied. Employing LDA, the system achieved a sensitivity of 80.52% at a false-positive rate of 1.90 false detections per image. With the GAM, the sensitivity increased to 83.12% and 1.46 false positives per image

[1]  K Doi,et al.  An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 1996, Medical physics.

[2]  P F Judy,et al.  Visualization and detection-localization on computed tomographic images. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[4]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  The effects of co-occurrence matrix based texture parameters on the classification of solitary pulmonary nodules imaged on computed tomography. , 1999, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[5]  Y. Masutani,et al.  Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. , 2002, Radiology.

[6]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Fast Implementations of Nonparametric Curve Estimators , 1994 .

[7]  K. Doi,et al.  Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. , 1996, Radiology.

[8]  M Souto,et al.  Evaluation of an automated wavelet-based system dedicated to the detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 2001, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[9]  M Souto,et al.  Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms. , 1996, Medical physics.

[11]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS for Windows : professional statistics, release 5 , 1992 .

[12]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of radiographic bone patterns: effect of imaging conditions on performance. , 2000, Medical physics.

[14]  P. G. Tahoces,et al.  Automatic detection of breast border and nipple in digital mammograms. , 1996, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[15]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[16]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[17]  P. G. Tahoces,et al.  A wavelet-based algorithm for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[18]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[19]  P. G. Tahoces,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms. , 1998, Medical physics.

[20]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Lung nodule detection on thoracic computed tomography images: preliminary evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system. , 2002, Medical physics.

[21]  David P. Naidich,et al.  Computed tomography and magnetic resonance of the thorax second edition , 1991 .

[22]  J. Lo,et al.  Outcome analysis of patients with acute pancreatitis by using an artificial neural network. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[23]  S. Armato,et al.  Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules on CT scans. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[25]  J. Swets ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[26]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses and normal tissue: linear discriminant analysis in texture feature space. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Jean D. Opsomer,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Backfitting Estimators , 2000 .

[28]  Gady Agam,et al.  Vessel tree reconstruction in thoracic CT scans with application to nodule detection , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Generalized Additive Models , 1991 .

[30]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[31]  C E Floyd,et al.  Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. , 2000, Medical physics.

[32]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[33]  S. Armato,et al.  Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: preliminary results. , 2001, Medical physics.

[34]  N. Petrick,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. , 1995, Medical physics.

[35]  K Doi,et al.  Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. , 1994, Medical physics.