Facilitators and barriers to stakeholder engagement in advance care planning for older adults in community settings: a hybrid systematic review protocol [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Background: Poor stakeholder engagement in advance care planning (ACP) poses national and international challenges, preventing maximisation of its potential benefits. Conceptualisation of advance care planning as a health behaviour highlights the need to design innovative, evidence-based strategies that will facilitate meaningful end-of-life care decision-making. Aim: To review systematically and synthesise quantitative and qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to stakeholders` engagement in ACP for older adults (≥ 50 years old) in a community setting. Methods: A hybrid systematic review will be conducted, identifying studies for consideration in two phases. First, databases will be searched from inception to identify relevant prior systematic reviews, and assess all studies included in those reviews against eligibility criteria (Phase 1). Second, databases will be searched systematically for individual studies falling outside the timeframe of those reviews (Phase 2). A modified SPIDER framework informed eligibility criteria. A study will be considered if it (a) included relevant adult stakeholders; (b) explored engagement in ACP among older adults (≥50 years old); (c) employed any type of design; (d) identified enablers and/or barriers to events specified in the Organising Framework of ACP Outcomes; (e) used either quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods methodology; and (f) evaluated phenomena of interest in a community setting (e.g., primary care or community healthcare centres). Screening, selection, Open Peer Review

[1]  Y. Engels,et al.  Barriers and facilitators for GPs in dementia advance care planning: A systematic integrative review , 2018, PloS one.

[2]  M. Shen,et al.  Strategies used to facilitate the discussion of advance care planning with older adults in primary care settings: A literature review , 2018, Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners.

[3]  F. Doyle,et al.  Systematic Review of Clinician-Reported Barriers to Provision of Smoking Cessation Interventions in Hospital Inpatient Settings , 2018 .

[4]  D. Meier,et al.  Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus. , 2018, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[5]  Michael J. Green,et al.  Can Playing an End-of-Life Conversation Game Motivate People to Engage in Advance Care Planning? , 2017, The American journal of hospice & palliative care.

[6]  J. V. van Delden,et al.  Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  B. Hemmelgarn,et al.  Prevalence of Barriers and Facilitators to Enhancing Conservative Kidney Management for Older Adults in the Primary Care Setting. , 2016, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[8]  P. Yates,et al.  Advance Care Planning in palliative care: A systematic literature review of the contextual factors influencing its uptake 2008–2012 , 2014, Palliative medicine.

[9]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Factors associated with initiation of advance care planning in dementia: a systematic review. , 2014, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[10]  K. Langa,et al.  Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  M. Pinquart,et al.  Depression and cancer mortality: a meta-analysis , 2010, Psychological Medicine.

[12]  D. Schillinger,et al.  Engagement in Multiple Steps of the Advance Care Planning Process: A Descriptive Study of Diverse Older Adults , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  R. Adelman,et al.  Completing an Advance Directive in the Primary Care Setting: What Do We Need for Success? , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[14]  M. Sandelowski,et al.  Defining and Designing Mixed Research Synthesis Studies. , 2006, Research in the schools : a nationally refereed journal sponsored by the Mid-South Educational Research Association and the University of Alabama.