Mapping do-it-yourself science

[1]  W. B. Gallie.  Essentially Contested Concepts , 1994, The Importance of Language.

[2]  M. Haklay,et al.  Citizen Science for Observing and Understanding the Earth , 2018 .

[3]  Christoph Aubrecht,et al.  Earth Observation Open Science and Innovation , 2018 .

[4]  Seyoum Eshetu Birkie,et al.  Circular economy as an essentially contested concept , 2018 .

[5]  Can Wu,et al.  The hot spot transformation in the research evolution of maker , 2017, Scientometrics.

[6]  J. Brown.  If you want something doing, do it yourself , 2017 .

[7]  A. Berditchevskaia,et al.  The changing face of expertise and the need for knowledge transfer , 2017 .

[8]  Jennifer Brown,et al.  Evolving skills for emerging technologies: a collaborative approach , 2017, Libr. Hi Tech.

[9]  Kaija Pesso,et al.  Open Minds, Open Spaces: Mind-Set Changes During Urban Walking , 2017 .

[10]  Anna Wexler.  The Social Context of “Do-It-Yourself” Brain Stimulation: Neurohackers, Biohackers, and Lifehackers , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Daniel Cressey,et al.  The DIY electronics transforming research , 2017, Nature.

[12]  S. Lindtner,et al.  Making and its promises , 2017 .

[13]  Amber Dance,et al.  Flexible working: Solo scientist , 2017, Nature.

[14]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Electrifying Engagement in Middle School Science Class: Improving Student Interest Through E-textiles , 2017 .

[15]  Ralf Dannowski,et al.  Communicating landscape hydrology — the water cycle in a box , 2017 .

[16]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Design and evaluation of a DIY construction system for educational robot kits , 2016 .

[17]  Jaume Piera,et al.  Citizen Bio-Optical Observations from Coast- and Ocean and Their Compatibility with Ocean Colour Satellite Measurements , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Brian Lamore.  Fan Cart: The Next Generation , 2016 .

[19]  R. Sleator.  DIY Biology – Hacking Goes Viral! , 2016, Science progress.

[20]  Josef Nguyen,et al.  Make Magazine and the Social Reproduction of DIY Science and Technology , 2016 .

[21]  R. Sleator.  Synthetic biology: from mainstream to counterculture , 2016, Archives of Microbiology.

[22]  S. Lowndes.  The DIY Movement in Art, Music and Publishing: Subjugated Knowledges , 2016 .

[23]  N. B. Andersen.  “Dioxins are the easiest topic to mention”: Resident activists’ construction of knowledge about low-level exposure to toxic chemicals , 2016, Public understanding of science.

[24]  Christopher E Mason,et al.  The Power of Engaging Citizen Scientists for Scientific Progress , 2016, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[25]  Jaume Piera,et al.  Estimating the Underwater Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient with a Low-Cost Instrument: The KdUINO DIY Buoy , 2016, Sensors.

[26]  John Richards.  Shifting Gender in Electronic Music: DIY and Maker Communities , 2016 .

[27]  Ina Fourie,et al.  What to make of makerspaces: Tools and DIY only or is there an interconnected information resources space? , 2015, Libr. Hi Tech.

[28]  Silvio Funtowicz,et al.  Sustainability and techno-science: What do we want to sustain and for whom? , 2015 .

[29]  M. James.  Synthetic Biology and Morality: Artificial Life and the Bounds of Nature , 2015 .

[30]  John J. Burke,et al.  Making Sense: Can Makerspaces Work in Academic Libraries? , 2015 .

[31]  L. Morawska,et al.  The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. , 2015, Environment international.

[32]  Louise Whiteley,et al.  Co‐Curation as Hacking: Biohackers in Copenhagen's Medical Museion , 2015 .

[33]  Francesca Mereu,et al.  Visions Project K.1: DIY 3-D interactive videohologram device , 2014, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[34]  Jennifer Shirk,et al.  The Invisible Prevalence of Citizen Science in Global Research: Migratory Birds and Climate Change , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  Anna Esposito,et al.  Approaching Social Robots Through Playfulness and Doing-It-Yourself: Children in Action , 2014, Cognitive Computation.

[36]  Mikolaj Morzy,et al.  ICT Services for open and citizen science , 2014, World Wide Web.

[37]  Kathleen Eggleson.  Transatlantic Divergences in Citizen Science Ethics—Comparative Analysis of the DIYbio Code of Ethics Drafts of 2011 , 2014 .

[38]  Eliza Strickland,et al.  Brain hacking [Resources_Geek life] , 2014, IEEE Spectrum.

[39]  Markus Schmidt,et al.  European do-it-yourself (DIY) biology: Beyond the hope, hype and horror , 2014, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[40]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators , 2014, CHI.

[41]  R. Byrne,et al.  Seawater pH measurements in the field: A DIY photometer with 0.01 unit pH accuracy , 2014 .

[42]  Catherine A Smith.  Handymen, Hippies and Healing: Social Transformation through the DIY Movement (1940s to 1970s) in North America , 2014 .

[43]  Matt Ratto,et al.  Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research , 2014, Inf. Soc..

[44]  F. Yamoah,et al.  Assessing Supermarket Food Shopper Reaction to Horsemeat Scandal in the UK , 2014 .

[45]  Martinho Guimaraes Pires Pereira Angela,et al.  From Citizen Science to Do It Yourself ScienceAn annotated account of an on-going movement , 2014 .

[46]  Meryl Alper Annenberg.  Making Space in the Makerspace : Building a Mixed-Ability Maker Culture , 2014 .

[47]  Thomas Landrain,et al.  Do-it-yourself biology: challenges and promises for an open science and technology movement , 2013, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[48]  Kat Austen,et al.  Out of the lab and onto the streets , 2013 .

[49]  J. Kai,et al.  Using social worlds theory to explore influences on community nurses’ experiences of providing out of hours paediatric palliative care , 2013 .

[50]  Ana Delgado,et al.  DIYbio: Making things and making futures , 2013 .

[51]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Crafting technology: Reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics , 2012, TCHI.

[52]  Rebecca Lave,et al.  Neoliberalism and the Production of Environmental Knowledge , 2012 .

[53]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms , 2012, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

[54]  L. Frewer,et al.  Consumer needs and requirements for food and ingredient traceability information , 2012 .

[55]  D. Cressey.  PhDs leave the ivory tower , 2012, Nature.

[56]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Mechanisms for collaboration: A design and evaluation framework for multi-user interfaces , 2012, TCHI.

[57]  A. Strauss.  A SOCIAL WORLD PERSPECTIVE* , 2012 .

[58]  Yu-Wei Lin,et al.  A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making , 2011, New Rev. Hypermedia Multim..

[59]  G. Gauchat.  Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere , 2012 .

[60]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[61]  L. Rennie,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use and Outcomes of Interactive Science Exhibits in Community Settings , 2010 .

[62]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Outlaw, hackers, victorian amateurs: diagnosing public participation in the life sciences today , 2010 .

[63]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Ready to leave the ivory tower?: Academic scientists’ appeal to work in the private sector , 2012 .

[64]  M. Radford.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. By Kathy Charmaz. London: Sage Publications, 2006. 224 pp. $34.95. ISBN 0761973532 (paperback). , 2008 .

[65]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake , 2007 .

[66]  Andrea Cornwall.  Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse , 2007 .

[67]  Shui Wan,et al.  Application of program generation technology in solving heat and flow problems , 2007 .

[68]  A. Vasconcelos,et al.  The use of Grounded Theory and of Arenas / Social Worlds Theory in Discourse Studies : A Case Study on the Discursive Adaptation of Information Systems , 2007 .

[69]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[70]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[71]  A. Clarke.  Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn , 2003 .

[72]  G. Cross.  Hobbies: Leisure and the Culture of Work in America. , 2000 .

[73]  K. Karlberg.  The work of genetic care providers: Managing uncertainty and ambiguity , 2000 .

[74]  R. Bonney,et al.  Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen‐science project , 2000 .

[75]  K. Garrety.  Science, Policy, and Controversy in the Cholesterol Arena , 1998 .

[76]  Stephen Duncombe,et al.  Notes from Underground: Zines and the Politics of Alternative Culture , 1997 .

[77]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[78]  W. B. Gallie.  IX.—Essentially Contested Concepts , 1956 .

[79]  W. Menninger.  PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF HOBBIES , 1942 .