Fixational instability and natural image statistics: Implications for early visual representations

Under natural viewing conditions, small movements of the eye, head and body prevent the maintenance of a steady direction of gaze. It is known that stimuli tend to fade when they are stabilized on the retina for several seconds. However, it is unclear whether the physiological motion of the retinal image serves a visual purpose during the brief periods of natural visual fixation. This study examines the impact of fixational instability on the statistics of the visual input to the retina and on the structure of neural activity in the early visual system. We show that fixational instability introduces a component in the retinal input signals that, in the presence of natural images, lacks spatial correlations. This component strongly influences neural activity in a model of the LGN. It decorrelates cell responses even if the contrast sensitivity functions of simulated cells are not perfectly tuned to counter-balance the power-law spectrum of natural images. A decorrelation of neural activity at the early stages of the visual system has been proposed to be beneficial for discarding statistical redundancies in the input signals. The results of this study suggest that fixational instability might contribute to the establishment of efficient representations of natural stimuli.

[1]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Power spectra for ocular drift and tremor , 1985, Vision Research.

[2]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Selective activation of visual cortex neurons by fixational eye movements: Implications for neural coding , 2001, Visual Neuroscience.

[3]  R. W. Ditchburn,et al.  What is psychophysically perfect image stabilization? Do perfectly stabilized images always disappear?: comment. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  L E Arend,et al.  What is psychophysically perfect image stabilization? Do perfectly stabilized images always disappear? , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  F. Attneave.  Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[6]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Receptive field properties of X and Y cells in the cat retina derived from contrast sensitivity measurements , 1982, Vision Research.

[7]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Transfer characteristics of lateral geniculate nucleus X neurons in the cat: effects of spatial frequency and contrast. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  L. Riggs,et al.  Involuntary motions of the eye during monocular fixation. , 1950, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Microsaccades differentially modulate neural activity in the striate and extrastriate visual cortex , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Response Variability of Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex (V1) of Alert Monkeys , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Hubel,et al.  The function of bursts of spikes during visual fixation in the awake primate lateral geniculate nucleus and primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  G. J. Burton,et al.  Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. , 1987, Applied optics.

[13]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  Eye Micro-movements Improve Stimulus Detection Beyond the Nyquist Limit in the Peripheral Retina , 2003, NIPS.

[14]  R. Reid,et al.  Precisely correlated firing in cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus , 1996, Nature.

[15]  R. W. DITCHBURN,et al.  Vision with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1952, Nature.

[16]  R. Shapley,et al.  Spatial tuning of cells in and around lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: X and Y relay cells and perigeniculate interneurons. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[18]  M. Rucci,et al.  Contributions of fixational eye movements to the discrimination of briefly presented stimuli. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[19]  A. L. Humphrey,et al.  Spatial and temporal response properties of lagged and nonlagged cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Reid,et al.  Saccadic Eye Movements Modulate Visual Responses in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 2002, Neuron.

[21]  Ehud Ahissar,et al.  Figuring Space by Time , 2001, Neuron.

[22]  Steinman Rm,et al.  The role of eye movement in the detection of contrast and spatial detail. , 1990 .

[23]  Michele Rucci,et al.  Modeling the Possible Influences of Eye Movements on the Refinement of Cortical Direction Selectivity , 2004 .

[24]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  G. Edelman,et al.  Modeling LGN Responses during Free-Viewing: A Possible Role of Microscopic Eye Movements in the Refinement of Cortical Orientation Selectivity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Markus Bongard,et al.  Retinal ganglion cell synchronization by fixational eye movements improves feature estimation , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  WILLIAM LANT CARPENTER.  Deep-Sea Soundings , 1872, Nature.

[28]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[29]  R C Reid,et al.  Visual physiology of the lateral geniculate nucleus in two species of New World monkey: Saimiri sciureus and Aotus trivirgatis , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  David A. Robinson,et al.  Fixation by the alert but solitary cat , 1975, Vision Research.

[31]  H Barlow,et al.  Redundancy reduction revisited , 2001, Network.

[32]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Quality of retinal image stabilization during small natural and artificial body rotations in man , 1979, Vision Research.

[34]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[35]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Spatiotemporal receptive field organization in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cats and kittens. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  L. Croner,et al.  Receptive fields of P and M ganglion cells across the primate retina , 1995, Vision Research.

[37]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  A jitter after-effect reveals motion-based stabilization of vision , 1998, Nature.

[38]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Miniature eye movement. , 1973, Science.

[39]  D. Hubel,et al.  The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  Eileen Kowler.  Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[41]  Michele Rucci,et al.  Decorrelation of neural activity during fixational instability: Possible implications for the refinement of V1 receptive fields , 2004, Visual Neuroscience.

[42]  Stephen A. Baccus,et al.  Segregation of object and background motion in the retina , 2003, Nature.

[43]  R. Steinman,et al.  The role of eye movement in the detection of contrast and spatial detail. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[44]  D Purves,et al.  The extraordinarily rapid disappearance of entoptic images. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Joseph J. Atick,et al.  What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes? , 1992, Neural Computation.