Conceptual Alignment: How Brains Achieve Mutual Understanding

We share our thoughts with other minds, but we do not understand how. Having a common language certainly helps, but infants' and tourists' communicative success clearly illustrates that sharing thoughts does not require signals with a pre-assigned meaning. In fact, human communicators jointly build a fleeting conceptual space in which signals are a means to seek and provide evidence for mutual understanding. Recent work has started to capture the neural mechanisms supporting those fleeting conceptual alignments. The evidence suggests that communicators and addressees achieve mutual understanding by using the same computational procedures, implemented in the same neuronal substrate, and operating over temporal scales independent from the signals' occurrences.

[1]  M. Tomasello,et al.  A new look at infant pointing. , 2007, Child development.

[2]  J. Kelso,et al.  The human dynamic clamp as a paradigm for social interaction , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Michael J Frank,et al.  Dopamine, Locus of Control, and the Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff , 2015, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[4]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Exploring the cognitive infrastructure of communication , 2012 .

[5]  Charles Kemp,et al.  How to Grow a Mind: Statistics, Structure, and Abstraction , 2011, Science.

[6]  Marc de Rosnay,et al.  Conversation and theory of mind: Do children talk their way to socio-cognitive understanding? , 2006 .

[7]  Alexia Galati,et al.  Chapter 8 - Two Minds, One Dialog: Coordinating Speaking and Understanding , 2010 .

[8]  J. Carpendale,et al.  Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children's social understanding within social interaction , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  Johan Kwisthout,et al.  The computational costs of recipient design and intention recognition in communication , 2011, CogSci.

[10]  M. Tomasello Origins of human communication , 2008 .

[11]  P. Hoffman,et al.  The anterior temporal lobes are critically involved in acquiring new conceptual knowledge: Evidence for impaired feature integration in semantic dementia , 2014, Cortex.

[12]  Lauri Parkkonen,et al.  Synchrony of brains and bodies during implicit interpersonal interaction , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  M. Frank,et al.  Mechanisms of hierarchical reinforcement learning in corticostriatal circuits 1: computational analysis. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Susumu Tonegawa,et al.  Conjunctive input processing drives feature selectivity in hippocampal CA1 neurons , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  H. Grice Utterer's meaning and intentions , 1969 .

[16]  S. Levinson,et al.  The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[17]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[18]  T. Scott-Phillips Speaking Our Minds: Why human communication is different, and how language evolved to make it special , 2014 .

[19]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[20]  Shane Legg,et al.  Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning , 2015, Nature.

[21]  M. Sabbagh Communicative Intentions and Language: Evidence from Right-Hemisphere Damage and Autism , 1999, Brain and Language.

[22]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[23]  J. Grafman,et al.  Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Lesions in Humans Eliminate Implicit Gender Stereotyping , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  C. Koch,et al.  The origin of extracellular fields and currents — EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Motor cognition–motor semantics: Action perception theory of cognition and communication , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Neural mechanisms of communicative innovation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  D. Hofstadter,et al.  Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking , 2013 .

[29]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why we’re so smart , 2003 .

[30]  G. Lupyan,et al.  What makes words special? Words as unmotivated cues , 2015, Cognition.

[31]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Cultural route to the emergence of linguistic categories , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  N. Foo Conceptual Spaces—The Geometry of Thought , 2022 .

[33]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Code Creation in Endogenous Merger Experiments , 2010 .

[34]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Alison R Hwong,et al.  Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding , 2010 .

[36]  M. Khamassi,et al.  Dopaminergic Control of the Exploration-Exploitation Trade-Off via the Basal Ganglia , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[37]  Andy Gardner,et al.  How do communication systems emerge? , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Chaozhe Zhu,et al.  Neural Synchronization during Face-to-Face Communication , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Sebastiaan Overeem,et al.  Understanding communicative actions: A repetitive TMS study , 2012, Cortex.

[40]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[41]  Ines Gloeckner,et al.  Relevance Communication And Cognition , 2016 .

[42]  B. Richmond,et al.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying Contextual Dependency of Subjective Values: Converging Evidence from Monkeys and Humans , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  G. Ritchie,et al.  Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication , 2008, Cognition.

[44]  Etienne Koechlin,et al.  Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex , 2014, Science.

[45]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[46]  Matthijs A. A. van der Meer,et al.  Internally generated sequences in learning and executing goal-directed behavior , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  How Language Programs the Mind , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[48]  K. Harris,et al.  Gating of Sensory Input by Spontaneous Cortical Activity , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Location-Dependent Excitatory Synaptic Interactions in Pyramidal Neuron Dendrites , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[50]  Ari Weinstein,et al.  Model-based hierarchical reinforcement learning and human action control , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  D. Hassabis,et al.  Tracking the Emergence of Conceptual Knowledge during Human Decision Making , 2009, Neuron.

[52]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  J. Elman An alternative view of the mental lexicon , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Giacomo Rizzolatti,et al.  Expressing our internal states and understanding those of others , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  In Sync: Metaphor, Mechanism or Marker of Mutual Understanding? , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  S. Garrod,et al.  Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  I.J.E.I. van Rooij,et al.  On the generation of shared symbols , 2015 .

[59]  N. Chater,et al.  Unwritten rules: virtual bargaining underpins social interaction, culture, and society , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[61]  M. Beeman Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from Discourse , 1993, Brain and Language.

[62]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Cerebral coherence between communicators marks the emergence of meaning , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Samuel J. Gershman,et al.  Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines , 2015, Science.

[64]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Cognition Unawares. (Book Reviews: Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious.) , 1996 .

[65]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[66]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Using relations within conceptual systems to translate across conceptual systems , 2002, Cognition.

[67]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Toward a neural basis of interactive alignment in conversation , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[68]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[69]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.

[70]  M. Grossman,et al.  Getting on the same page: The neural basis for social coordination deficits in behavioral variant frontotemporal degeneration , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[71]  Jeremy R. Manning,et al.  Broadband Shifts in Local Field Potential Power Spectra Are Correlated with Single-Neuron Spiking in Humans , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[73]  K. Miller Broadband Spectral Change: Evidence for a Macroscale Correlate of Population Firing Rate? , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[74]  P. Kay,et al.  Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  On the human ‘interactional engine’ , 2006 .

[76]  Mark Blokpoel,et al.  Understanding understanding: A computational-level perspective , 2015 .

[77]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Mental Action Simulation Synchronizes Action–Observation Circuits across Individuals , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[78]  Reinhard Selten,et al.  The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Michael Okun,et al.  The Subthreshold Relation between Cortical Local Field Potential and Neuronal Firing Unveiled by Intracellular Recordings in Awake Rats , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[80]  Emily J. Mayberry,et al.  Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  M. Siegal,et al.  Neural systems involved in 'theory of mind' , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[82]  Pascale Fung,et al.  ROBOTS WITH HEART. , 2015, Scientific American.

[83]  G. Altmann,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2007 .

[84]  Spencer L. Smith,et al.  Dendritic spikes enhance stimulus selectivity in cortical neurons in vivo , 2013, Nature.

[85]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Experimental Semiotics: A Review , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[86]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  On our best behaviour , 2014, Artif. Intell..

[87]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Interactive Evolution of Human Communication Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[88]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Content-specific coordination of listeners' to speakers' EEG during communication , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[89]  S. Kirby,et al.  Iterated learning and the evolution of language , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[90]  I. Noveck,et al.  Experimental Pragmatics: a Gricean turn in the study of language , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[91]  Andrea Baronchelli,et al.  The spontaneous emergence of conventions: An experimental study of cultural evolution , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[92]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Mother-Infant Contingent Vocalizations in 11 Countries , 2015, Psychological science.

[93]  Y. Niv,et al.  Learning latent structure: carving nature at its joints , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[94]  N. Spruston,et al.  Conditional dendritic spike propagation following distal synaptic activation of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[95]  I. Toni,et al.  Altered Communicative Decisions following Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions , 2015, Current Biology.

[96]  Riccardo Fusaroli,et al.  Carving language for social coordination: A dynamical approach , 2012 .

[97]  Johan Kwisthout,et al.  Intentional Communication: Computationally Easy or Difficult? , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[98]  K. Vogeley,et al.  Toward a second-person neuroscience 1 , 2013, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[99]  F. Durso,et al.  Graph-Theoretic Confirmation of Restructuring During Insight , 1994 .

[100]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[101]  Mark Blokpoel,et al.  Recipient design in human communication: simple heuristics or perspective taking? , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[102]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Early Social Experience Predicts Referential Communicative Adjustments in Five-Year-Old Children , 2013, PloS one.

[103]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Active inference, communication and hermeneutics , 2015, Cortex.

[104]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[105]  M. Larkum A cellular mechanism for cortical associations: an organizing principle for the cerebral cortex , 2013, Trends in Neurosciences.

[106]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[107]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Neural Correlates of Intentional Communication , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[108]  L. Steels Evolving grounded communication for robots , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.