Comparative analysis of abrasive waterjet (AWJ) technology with selected unconventional manufacturing processes

In today’s competitive business environment the development of new technologies (Ergincan et al., 2010) with their advances and application in practice enforces the use of multi-criteria decision making processes for selection of appropriate technologies (Sharma et al., 2011). Efformation of appropriate selection criteria is determined by many parameters and variables such as technological advancement, nature of row materials, quantity of products or semi-products, quality requirements, etc. These criteria absorb even contradictory requirements. Therefore, sometimes it may be necessary to choose even a compromise solution (Willet, 1996). Especially for small and medium-size firms with low or medium product range and repeatability, this is ultimately the decisive factor that influences the choice of applicable technology and cost ratio of the technological process (Gursoz and Prinz, 1988; Shen and Lei, 2011; Sun et al., 2010; Cakicier et al., 2010). When comparing the technological and economic benefits of the deployment and use of technologies in cutting of metals (Zaghbani et al., 2010), the following critical criteria may allow the decision maker to make a realistic comparison and evaluation for the convenience

[1]  Susumu Kanda,et al.  The Latest Technology of Plasma Cutting , 2010 .

[2]  Muammer Tün,et al.  Advanced technologies for archaeological documentation: Patara case. , 2010 .

[3]  Katarina Monkova,et al.  Impact of abrasive mass flow rate when penetrating into a material on its vibration , 2010 .

[4]  S. Lei,et al.  Experimental study on operating temperature in laser-assisted milling of silicon nitride ceramics , 2011 .

[5]  S. Dallavalle,et al.  Optimization of plasma arc cutting of mild steel thin plates , 2008, 2008 IEEE 35th International Conference on Plasma Science.

[6]  Dipten Misra,et al.  Effect of process parameters on the cutting quality in lasox cutting of mild steel , 2009 .

[7]  Victor Songmene,et al.  Evaluation of sustainability of mould steels based on machinability data , 2010 .

[8]  T. A. El-Taweel,et al.  Parametric studies on the CO2 laser cutting of Kevlar-49 composite , 2009 .

[9]  M. Dargusch,et al.  Thermally enhanced machining of hard-to-machine materials: a review , 2010 .

[10]  F. Al-Sulaiman,et al.  CO2 laser cutting of Kevlar laminate: influence of assisting gas pressure , 2009 .

[11]  Jan Valíček,et al.  Estimation of the smooth zone maximal depth at surfaces created by Abrasive Waterjet , 2009 .

[12]  Sergej Hloch,et al.  Multi response optimization of process parameters based on Taguchi—Fuzzy model for coal cutting by water jet technology , 2011 .

[13]  Yusuf Kaynak,et al.  Dimensional analyses and surface quality of the laser cutting process for engineering plastics , 2009 .

[14]  Jan Valíček,et al.  Using the acoustic sound pressure level for quality prediction of surfaces created by abrasive waterjet , 2010 .

[15]  Ye Li,et al.  Taguchi-based Six Sigma approach to optimize plasma cutting process: an industrial case study , 2009 .

[16]  Jan Valíček,et al.  Optical measurement of surface and topographical parameters investigation created by Abrasive Waterjet , 2009 .

[17]  Jan Valíček,et al.  Surface geometric parameters proposal for the advanced control of abrasive waterjet technology , 2008 .

[18]  Sergej Hloch,et al.  WATER JET TECHNOLOGY USED IN MEDICINE , 2010 .

[19]  Sergej Hloch,et al.  Experimental Study of Surface Topography Created by Abrasive Waterjet Cutting , 2007 .

[20]  F. B. Prinz,et al.  The Use of Robotics and Expert Systems for the Manufacture of Structural Beams , 1988 .

[21]  Jan Valíček,et al.  An investigation of surfaces generated by abrasive waterjets using optical detection , 2007 .