Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis With Respect to Bounds of Truncated Distributions

Bounds on variables are often implemented as a part of a quality control program to ensure a sufficient pedigree of a product component, and these bounds may significantly affect the product's design through constraints such as cost, manufacturability, and reliability. Thus, it is useful to determine the sensitivity of the product reliability to the imposed bounds. In this work, a method to compute the partial derivatives of the probability-of-failure and the response moments, such as mean and the standard deviation, with respect to the bounds of truncated distributions are derived for rectangular truncation. The sensitivities with respect to the bounds are computed using a supplemental "flux" integral that can be combined with the probability-of-failure or response moment information. The formulation is exact in the sense that the accuracy depends only upon the numerical algorithms employed. The flux integral is formulated as a special case of the probability integral for which the sensitivities are being computed. As a result, the methodology can be implemented with any probabilistic method, such as sampling, first order reliability method, conditional expectation, etc. Moreover, the maximum and minimum values of the sensitivities can be obtained without any additional computational cost. The methodology is quite general and can be applied to both component and system reliability. Several numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method. In comparison, the examples using Monte Carlo sampling demonstrated that the flux-based methodology achieved the same accuracy as a standard finite difference approach using approximately 4 orders of magnitude fewer samples. This is largely due to the fact that this method does not rely upon subtraction of two near-equal numbers.

[1]  Agus Sudjianto,et al.  Relative Entropy Based Method for Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis in Engineering Design , 2006 .

[2]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[3]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[4]  Harley Flanders,et al.  Differentiation Under the Integral Sign , 1973 .

[5]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR EFFICIENT STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY AND RELIABILITY SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[6]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[7]  Jason H. Goodfriend,et al.  Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method , 1995 .

[8]  Y. Fung Foundations of solid mechanics , 1965 .

[9]  Dirk P. Kroese,et al.  Simulation and the Monte Carlo method , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[10]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Simulation Models by the Score Function Method , 1996 .

[11]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[13]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  Variable screening and ranking using sampling-based sensitivity measures , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Robert H. Sues,et al.  System reliability and sensitivity factors via the MPPSS method , 2005 .

[15]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[16]  Harry R. Millwater,et al.  Universal properties of kernel functions for probabilistic sensitivity analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Omission sensitivity factors , 1988 .

[18]  D. Broek The practical use of fracture mechanics , 1988 .

[19]  Niels C. Lind,et al.  Methods of structural safety , 2006 .