Monitoring change requires a rethink of assessment practices in voice and speech

Abstract Assessment for the purpose of monitoring change over time requires a different practical and statistical approach to that of assessment for diagnosing impairment. Sophisticated methods exist for identifying strengths and weaknesses in a patient's voice/speech profile, yet our understanding of the impact of repeated assessment is limited. Monitoring change necessitates that stimuli are stable in the absence of any true change in functioning, while remaining sensitive to influences that are considered to alter functioning (degeneration, therapy). The current paper discusses the issues relating to stimuli selection, identifying error within the sample and appropriate statistical models for identifying intra-individual change in the context of clinical and experimental speech or voice examinations.

[1]  Dimitar D Deliyski,et al.  Regression Tree Approach to Studying Factors Influencing Acoustic Voice Analysis , 2006, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[2]  L. Cronbach Test “reliability”: Its meaning and determination , 1947, Psychometrika.

[3]  W G Hopkins,et al.  Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science , 2000, Sports medicine.

[4]  P. Snyder,et al.  The use of effect sizes to characterize the nature of cognitive change in psychopharmacological studies: an example with scopolamine , 2008, Human psychopharmacology.

[5]  M. Ylvisaker,et al.  The use of standardized tests for individuals with cognitive-communication disorders. , 2005, Seminars in speech and language.

[6]  J. Abitbol,et al.  Sex hormones and the female voice. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[7]  R. Hillman,et al.  Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol. , 2009, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[8]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Reliability of the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program for the Analysis of Voice Samples of Subjects With Dysarthria , 1999 .

[9]  J. Mundt,et al.  Vocal Acoustic Biomarkers of Depression Severity and Treatment Response , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[10]  Paul Maruff,et al.  Comparison of voice acquisition methodologies in speech research , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[11]  C. Newman,et al.  The Voice Handicap Index (VHI)Development and Validation , 1997 .

[12]  R. Zraick,et al.  The effect of speaking context on elicitation of habitual pitch. , 2006, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[13]  J. Kreiman,et al.  Perceptual Assessment of Voice Quality: Past, Present, and Future , 2010 .

[14]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .

[15]  W Decoster,et al.  Longitudinal voice changes: facts and interpretation. , 2000, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[16]  L. Morales,et al.  The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life , 2001, Annals of medicine.

[17]  Janet Fletcher,et al.  Reliability, stability, and sensitivity to change and impairment in acoustic measures of timing and frequency. , 2011, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[18]  K. Garrett,et al.  An acoustic analysis of fluctuations in the voices of normal adult speakers across three times of day. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S. Haynes,et al.  Principles and Practice of Behavioral Assessment , 1999 .

[20]  Paul Maruff,et al.  Standardization of pitch-range settings in voice acoustic analysis , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[21]  I. Titze,et al.  Time-of-day effects on voice range profile performance in young, vocally untrained adult females. , 1999, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[22]  Adam P Vogel,et al.  Factors affecting the quality of sound recording for speech and voice analysis , 2009, International journal of speech-language pathology.

[23]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics Notes: Measurement error and correlation coefficients , 1996, BMJ.

[24]  A. Morgan,et al.  Assessment of impairment or monitoring change in Friedreich ataxia , 2010, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[25]  M. Pandolfo,et al.  Friedreich ataxia , 2023, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[26]  P. Maruff,et al.  Practice Effects Associated with the Repeated Assessment of Cognitive Function Using the CogState Battery at 10-minute, One Week and One Month Test-retest Intervals , 2006, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[27]  D. Altman,et al.  Measurement error. , 1996, BMJ.

[28]  P. Maruff,et al.  Acoustic analysis of the effects of sustained wakefulness on speech. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Anne-Maria Laukkanen,et al.  Changes in voice during a day in normal voices without vocal loading , 2002, Logopedics, phoniatrics, vocology.