A new device to measure knee laxity during weightbearing and non‐weightbearing conditions

The Vermont knee laxity device (VKLD) was developed to evaluate anterior—posterior (A—P) displacement of the tibia relative to the femur (A—P laxity) during weightbearing and non‐weightbearing conditions. The purposes of this study were to determine the repeatability and reliability of the VKLD measurements of A—P laxity and to compare them with two devices currently in clinical use: the KT‐1000 knee arthrometer and planar stress radiography. Two independent examiners tested six subjects with no history of knee injury. A—P laxity was measured on three separate days with the KT‐1000 and the VKLD. With the VKLD, A—P laxity was measured in the weightbearing and non‐weightbearing conditions. In addition, one examiner measured A—P laxity in each subject on each day using a planar stress radiography technique. Similar A—P laxity values were obtained with the KT‐1000 and the VKLD; however, the planar stress radiography technique measured less A—P laxity compared to the VKLD (9.2 ± 2.2 mm versus 13.3 ± 2.9 mm, P = 0.0004). None of the three devices showed significant differences in measuring A—P laxity between days. During weightbearing, A—P laxity was reduced by 65–70% compared to the non‐weightbearing condition (P = 0.0001). Future investigations will use the VKLD to study subjects that have suffered injury to the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. © 2001 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  G. Losse,et al.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  R. Warren,et al.  The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of the human knee. A biomechanical study. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  L. Huston,et al.  Neuromuscular Performance in Normal and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Lower Extremities , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  P. Walker,et al.  Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  F. Noyes,et al.  Limits of movement in the human knee. Effect of sectioning the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral structures. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  F. Noyes,et al.  Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  R J Johnson,et al.  The Effect of Functional Knee Bracing on the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the Weightbearing and Nonweightbearing Knee , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  M Tew,et al.  Is the KT1000 knee ligament arthrometer reliable? , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  R. Warren,et al.  An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R. Johnson,et al.  Clinical versus instrumented knee testing on autopsy specimens. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  J. King,et al.  The Stryker knee arthrometer in clinical practice , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  C. Highgenboten,et al.  Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  E S Grood,et al.  Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population , 1990, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  K. Markolf,et al.  In vivo knee stability. A quantitative assessment using an instrumented clinical testing apparatus. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  A. Anderson,et al.  Preoperative instrumented testing of anterior and posterior knee laxity , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  F. Noyes,et al.  Current concepts review. The definitions of terms for motion and position of the knee and injuries of the ligaments. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  B Zarins,et al.  Measurement of anterior-posterior displacement of the knee. A comparison of the results with instrumented devices and with clinical examination. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  K. Markolf,et al.  The role of joint load in knee stability. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  B Noesberger,et al.  Stressradiography of the knee. Cruciate ligament function studied in 138 patients. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[20]  T. Santner,et al.  Measurement reproducibility of two commercial knee test devices , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  J. Gillquist,et al.  Instrumented testing for evaluation of sagittal knee laxity. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  R. Warren,et al.  The Effect of Joint-Compressive Load and Quadriceps Muscle Force on Knee Motion in the Intact and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Sectioned Knee , 1994, The American journal of sports medicine.